Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iH9bdT5tcFOJz0hhY1fBBfP9KbLQ

http://www.dyson.co.uk/store/productmodel.asp?model=DC22

mole wrote:

So eloquently written mole.  Otherwise I would have thought you wrote it.

I could not find a Dyson model that rated less than 4 stars overall.  Most are 5.  The DC16 even rates 4 stars.

You monkeys should go back to what you do best.  You can turn over. Carmine's turn to scratch.

Aw Shuckins HARDBALL, thankz, i new youd like it,

 
But i rely doo luvs my DYSON, CONSIDERING my other vacuum was a floor mop and dustpan.

I realy lik the lifetime filterz they nevr has to bee replaced ya no, and the long hoze is very kool also i can cleen my hole housse without liftting the vacum,i live in a box ya no,

im not that muche edumacated, youd problly  gest that by now, but dyson said that peple like mee are ther target maket............

ELOM...............

mole wrote:

I did not realize that you previously owned an Oreck.

HARDSELL wrote:
You know what H.S. i really did have an ORECK i won one in a dealer contest, i sold it to someone in Springfield Missouri, i think it was called the vac shack..............

mole

mole wrote:

So you won a gag prize.

HARDSELL wrote:

Soooo HS, that's how you came to get a free dyson DC07.  You won the boo-bie prize!  Lucky you! 

Like dyson giving away 140,000 Air Blades to jump start its sales.  Ain't working.  Donees did what you did!  Sold them and used the money for something else.

Hey Prez, you reading here?  I got an idea for an economic stimulus package.  Buy up all the new DC07 dysons that Wal*Mart dumped on dyson and dyson dumped on BEST BUY and give them away to the US taxpayers.  They'll sell them, like HS did, and use the funds to make new purchases.  Win, win!

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:

Carmine,

I see you are still dreaming.  When you lose you resort to fiction and lies to divert your loss.

I paid $399 for the DC07.  Dyson does not have to give freebies like Oreck does.  I could really rack up if I wanted to.  Buy the Oreck, keep the gift and return the vac.  That is not me though.

Hey HS Man:

I might believe that you were foolish enough to spend $2000 on new golf clubs.  After all, all men like their toys and are willing to spend lavishly for their enjoyment, entertainment, and recreation.

But even you HARDSELL would not be foolish enough to spend $399 for a DC07.  You said so recently.  No.  Not when you could have easily saved at least 20 percent at a number of retailers without any effort.  That's an $80 savings. 

NO you didn't pay $399 for a dyson.  Not when you got one free for using it and posting about it.  You told us that you wouldn't pay $399 for a DC07.  Too expensive were your own words. 

Carmine D.

DysonInventsBig wrote: mole wrote:

Mole,

Vacuum/Bag manufacturers cannot guarantee 100% suction strength while using their product/s. - Dyson can.  So what does Dyson technologies have to do with performance? - Plenty.        DIB

Hey DIB Man:

If suction alone were the performance standard for uprights and rug cleaning you would be right.  It's not.  Just as MOLE's point that filtration and air flow are not the performance standard.  In fact far from it.

Don't believe MOLE  and me.  Read the post that Motor man has on another thread here.   Like you he is a dyson fan. 

Suction power [to pick up], brush roll design and function [ to agitate, loosen and groom], and filtration [to cool heated motor during operation and preserve the air quality in the room from the contained dirt/odors] all must combine in a perfect balance.  When these are present on upright vacuums the result is an efficient and effective machine to properly clean and groom rugs and carpets. 

Of course, it takes a user with the inclination, wherewithal, and time to put the vacuum to proper use.

Carmine D.