Abby's Guide to Vacuum Cleaners
Username Password
Home Discussions Reviews More Guides
Abby’s Guide > Vacuum Cleaners > Discussions > Dyson, In The News...

Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Search For:
DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454

Dyson, In The News...
Original Message   Sep 11, 2007 5:40 pm

This message was modified Jan 29, 2008 by DysonInventsBig



Replies: 235 - 244 of 278Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
M00seUK


Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #235   Jun 24, 2008 5:49 pm
dusty wrote:
As mentioned in another thread, you're looking as bestbuys.com and not bestbuy.com.  Best Buy do not sell Oreck but continue to carry Dyson, Hoover, Bissell etc.

Dusty

Thanks for the tip off, looks like it'll be interesting to follow this through the week.
CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #236   Jun 24, 2008 6:21 pm
dusty wrote:
As mentioned in another thread, you're looking as bestbuys.com and not bestbuy.com.  Best Buy do not sell Oreck but continue to carry Dyson, Hoover, Bissell etc.

Dusty



Hello Dusty:

Thank you for the correction.  I was wrong on posting BEST BUY.  You are correct it is Bestbuy.com.  As you mentioned in the other thread, bestbuys directs buyers to products and retailers with the best prices.  Correct?  The bulk of the vacuum products advertised and trafficked to prospective buyers are from HOOVER.  Dysons, save ORECK, are the least number and all are discounted from MSRP. 

Bestbuy.com's 2.5 stars for the DC16, based on 40 epinions, is the worse rated dyson.  All retailers who carry the DC16, which retails for $149, may soon follow dyson's lead and discount the piece by $100 with another dyson purchase/giveaway?  Quite possibly as soon as July 4. 

Like M00seUK said:  Time will tell. Have to watch the events unfold as we officially enter the summer season, traditionally the worse time of the year for non-summer seasonal sales, like vacuums.

Carmine D.

This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by CarmineD
HARDSELL


Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #237   Jun 24, 2008 6:53 pm
CarmineD wrote:
CIRCUIT CITY, which is suffering from poor sales like many big box retailers, has dropped the dyson vacuum line from its stores.  Keeps the old/to be discountinued dysons [nothing new from dyson at CC] on the Web Site [at least for now].  All dysons at CC are at reduced/discounted prices from MSRP.  

Carmine D.



Most all vacuums at CC are on sale.  Seems as only the cheapos are not on sale.
dusty


Joined: Feb 8, 2008
Points: 264

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #238   Jun 24, 2008 6:56 pm
CarmineD wrote:
Hello Dusty:

  As you mentioned in the other thread, bestbuys directs buyers to products and retailers with the best prices.  Correct?  The bulk of the vacuum products advertised and trafficked to prospective buyers are from HOOVER.  Dysons, save ORECK, are the least number and all are discounted from MSRP. 



That is correct.  Best Buys in nothing more than a portal for Shopping.com.  If you were to click on the Oreck link, the owner of Best Buys would get paid by Shopping.com for the traffic. The reviews on the site are pulled from Epinions.com  and not from site users themselves.  I don't believe the high end Orecks to be discounted as they can only be purchased from Oreck.com where all the other brands can be purchased from either online or box stores which explains the sub MSRP pricing.

Dusty
HARDSELL


Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #239   Jun 24, 2008 7:18 pm
CarmineD wrote:
Hello Dusty:

Bestbuy.com's 2.5 stars for the DC16, based on 40 epinions, is the worse rated dyson.  All retailers who carry the DC16, which retails for $149, may soon follow dyson's lead and discount the piece by $100 with another dyson purchase/giveaway?  Quite possibly as soon as July 4. 

Carmine D.



BEST BUY on-line now carries ORECK vacuums.  One talked about here the XL21 gets 4 out of 5 stars based on 40 reviews.  The BEST BUY Site says the following verbatim:

Carmine D.

In the past few days you stated that those starr ratings are useless.  That was prior to your being able to use them to your advantage.  Think about it next time before you accuse someone of flip flopping.

CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #240   Jun 24, 2008 7:28 pm
dusty wrote:
I don't believe the high end Orecks to be discounted as they can only be purchased from Oreck.com where all the other brands can be purchased from either online or box stores which explains the sub MSRP pricing.

Dusty


Agree.  The ORECK XL 21 is marketed to a select group of vacuum buyers.  When you amortize the $750 over 21 years of guarantee the cost is $35 dollars per year.  There are no costs, save bags, associated with the vacuum over the 21 years.  And ORECK will put in a new bag free with each yearly tune-up.  For people who have this money for a vacuum, it is worth the money.  Obviously, I went with the least expensive XL Classic and no giveaways for $150 plus shipping.

Carmine D. 

dusty


Joined: Feb 8, 2008
Points: 264

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #241   Jun 24, 2008 7:28 pm
This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by dusty
CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #242   Jun 24, 2008 7:32 pm
HARDSELL wrote:
In the past few days you stated that those starr ratings are useless.  That was prior to your being able to use them to your advantage.  Think about it next time before you accuse someone of flip flopping.


Generally you quote me HS, but this time you didn't.  Please go back to my posts on these several occasions.  On the ORECK thread.  My words are to this effect and I paraphrase: 

I don't believe negative ORECK reviews from anonymous posters.  I prefer my own personal and professional experience and those of people I know with ORECK-s. 

All rational consumers would think and say the same as me above.  Except you.  That's the reason I qualified my statement with 'rational.'   For the benefit of people like you who praise a bagless brand endlessly then sell it, and/or return a newly purchased one because they are dissatisfied with it.  With the sales proceeds/store credit buy and use a bagged brand instead that they like less.  And then try to justify the mistake by giving similar examples of mistakes in judgments from 40 years ago. 

Carmine D.

This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by CarmineD
dusty


Joined: Feb 8, 2008
Points: 264

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #243   Jun 24, 2008 7:46 pm
CarmineD wrote:
Agree.  The ORECK XL 21 is marketed to a select group of vacuum buyers.  When you amortize the $750 over 21 years of guarantee the cost is $35 dollars per year.  There are no costs, save bags, associated with the vacuum over the 21 years.  And ORECK will put in a new bag free with each yearly tune-up.  For people who have this money for a vacuum, it is worth the money.  Obviously, I went with the least expensive XL Classic and no giveaways for $150 plus shipping.

Carmine D. 


While your math is sound it does not take into account things like agitator  replacement, broken fans, blockages, or belt changes that would all incur extra labor charges and not be covered under warranty.  You may get a freebie once a year on the belt but from my experience Oreck generally require 2 or 3 if used for routine vacuuming and those costs must be factored in.

Dusty
CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Dyson, In The News...
Reply #244   Jun 24, 2008 8:05 pm
dusty wrote:
While your math is sound it does not take into account things like agitator  replacement, broken fans, blockages, or belt changes that would all incur extra labor charges and not be covered under warranty.  You may get a freebie once a year on the belt but from my experience Oreck generally require 2 or 3 if used for routine vacuuming and those costs must be factored in.

Dusty


True to a degree.  A customer gets one tune up free per year.  If a blockage occurs, the customer can make that the free yearly tune-up.  No charge.  Or, the blockages are easy for users to correct themselves.  The ORECK Users guide shows clearly with directions and illustrations. 

I've used the Classic XL every day for over a year.  No blockages.  Brush is still brand new.  As are the edge cleaning whiskers.  My dear Wife picked up a quarter by mistake.  No broken fan.  I replace the belt every 6 months.  This is the ORECK store policy.  User Guide says 9 months, I think.  Cost is $3.00 from ORECK, less from a indy.  It is easy for a user to do and the Users Guide illustrates and explains.

Carmine D.

This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by CarmineD
Replies: 235 - 244 of 278Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
Vacuum Cleaners Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2024 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.