Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Original Message May 29, 2008 12:41 pm |
|
ORECK - The business, the history, the machine, the man and related. (Below: Oreck 1979 to 2008)
< yr. 1979 < yr. 5/2008
This message was modified Oct 30, 2008 by DysonInventsBig
|
dusty
Joined: Feb 8, 2008
Points: 264
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #157 Jun 24, 2008 2:59 pm |
|
BEST BUY on-line now carries ORECK vacuums. One talked about here the XL21 gets 4 out of 5 stars based on 40 reviews. The BEST BUY Site says the following verbatim: Oreck XL21. It's destined to become the standard by which all other vacuums are judged because it comes with an unprecedented 21-year Guarantee and 21 years of FREE tune-ups! From the bottom of its double-helix, high-speed, pile-lifting roller brushes, to the top of its redesigned comfort fit Helping Hand Handle, the XL21 delivers unsurpassed power and maneuverability. http://www.bestbuys.com/p24159261-Oreck-XL21-Bagged-Upright-Vacuum--reviews.html Carmine D. This isn't Best Buy...it's Best Buys, which has nothing to do with the Best Buy chain. Best Buys is simply an affiliate for Shopping.com and gets paid by sending traffic to participating merchants. Dusty
This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by dusty
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #158 Jun 24, 2008 5:58 pm |
|
May be of interest… Hunters Senior Vice President of Sales – Art Massey (formerly Hunter’s vice president of marketing and product development) demoed an air purifier on HSN back in February, 2008. During the demonstration he said, “I coined this phrase here on HSN about 8 years ago folks, and this is the truth… But you hear the other guy (Oreck) say it and he stole it from me and that’s a fact!” “If you’re going to clean the air then you have to move the air.”
“If you’re going to clean the air then you have to move the air.”
DIB: This is a statement of fact you quoted. Statements of fact are not "coined" by authors at the exclusion of use by all others. If this gentleman believes they are, and you too, then he and you have a skewed sense of perspective. Certainly one I do not hold. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 20, 2008 by CarmineD --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Below is one of 1 of 159 trademarks owned by Oreck....
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #159 Jun 24, 2008 6:23 pm |
|
This isn't Best Buy...it's Best Buys, which has nothing to do with the Best Buy chain. Best Buys is simply an affiliate for Shopping.com and gets paid by sending traffic to participating merchants.
Dusty
Hello Dusty:
Thank you again. You are correct. I was wrong. Interesting rating for the ORECK XL 21. Of course only 40 reviews, but still an 80 percent overall. Not too bad. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #160 Jun 24, 2008 6:32 pm |
|
DIB: Please correct me if I'm wrong [As Dusty did]. It appears that the notice of the trademark is published for comment and in particular for "protest/opposition." I presume the reason for this is to allow ORECK to stake its claim as originator and/or others to protest/oppose as originator. During this time of notice, why didn't the supposed originator protest? And if he fails to do so, isn't he/she preempted from doing so after the due date? In other words, anyone could say they were first. But, if you didn't record/protest the official recordation within the time period allowed, you are preempted from any legal recourse. In other words, you're out of luck. ORECK wins by virtue of recording first and not meeting with any official protest in the alloted time to do so. Is this correct from your perspective? Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by CarmineD
|
dusty
Joined: Feb 8, 2008
Points: 264
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #161 Jun 24, 2008 6:36 pm |
|
Hello Dusty: Thank you again. You are correct. I was wrong. Interesting rating for the ORECK XL 21. Of course only 40 reviews, but still an 80 percent overall. Not to bad. Carmine D. Same could be said for the Dyson DC15. Four and a half stars out of five. http://www.bestbuys.com/p24122475-Dyson-DC15-All-Floors---The-Ball-Bagless-Upright-Cyclonic-Vacuum--reviews.html To each their own, shall we say. Dusty
This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by dusty
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #162 Jun 24, 2008 7:50 pm |
|
Dusty: I would add one more observation to make the ORECK XL 21's star rating interesting based on 40 epinions. Consumer Reports typically and consistently rates this ORECK model above all the dysons save one: the DC17. So while each their own sounds good, the epinions and CR reviews for ORECK are congruent. I can't say the same for the epinions star ratings and CR reviews for other brands like dyson which typically gets fair to middlin from CR. Also Dusty if you don't mind me saying: When you put parens around the http site as you did in your post above, the site can't be found. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by CarmineD
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #164 Jun 24, 2008 8:04 pm |
|
DIB: Please correct me if I'm wrong [As Dusty did]. It appears that the notice of the trademark is published for comment and in particular for "protest/opposition." I presume the reason for this is to allow ORECK to stake its claim as originator and/or others to protest/oppose as originator. During this time of notice, why didn't the supposed originator protest? And if he fails to do so, isn't he/she preempted from doing so after the due date? In other words, anyone could say they were first. But, if you didn't record/protest the official recordation within the time period allowed, you are preempted from any legal recourse. In other words, you're out of luck. ORECK wins by virtue of recording first and not meeting with any official protest in the alloted time to do so. Is this correct from your perspective? Carmine D. Carmine, I’ll be glad to answer your question, but me first… Q: What is more reassuring for Oreck Dealers and alike…. A) Hearing a competitor say on a live national t.v. (HSN) and proclaiming to hundreds of thousand of viewers (at minimum) that “the other guy stole it from me and that’s fact” or B) Knowing “Your guy” is super creative and Trademarked their original phrase?
. What is to prevent Hunter Air from continually stating the above. If there’s archived video of Hunter Air using this phrase 8 years or so prior, what can Oreck do? DIB
This message was modified Jun 25, 2008 by DysonInventsBig
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #165 Jun 24, 2008 8:16 pm |
|
DIB: It makes for a good sales show. The guy had his chance to protest and officially prove he said it first. He didn't. ORECK gets the credit he gets to put on a good show. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by CarmineD
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #166 Jun 24, 2008 9:18 pm |
|
Dusty: I would add one more observation to make the ORECK XL 21's star rating interesting based on 40 epinions. Consumer Reports typically and consistently rates this ORECK model above all the dysons save one: the DC17. So while each their own sounds good, the epinions and CR reviews for ORECK are congruent. I can't say the same for the epinions star ratings and CR reviews for other brands like dyson which typically gets fair to middlin from CR. Also Dusty if you don't mind me saying: When you put parens around the http site as you did in your post above, the site can't be found. Carmine D.
CR. The one who lost a law suit for giving a bad report on a certain electronics good and has raed them at the top ever since. Also, awarded a best buy to a van simply because it had so many cup holders.
It is only logical that they rate Hoover and Oreck over Dyson because they have headlights to over ride the poor performance of both.
This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by HARDSELL
|
|
|