Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
kelizabeth
Joined: Jan 7, 2008
Points: 2
|
|
sand
Original Message Jan 7, 2008 9:25 pm |
|
I am trying to help my son's preschool (we're a co-op) select the best vacuum. Everyday lots and lots and lots of sand makes its way into our classroom. The sand has laid to rest an expensive Oreck in less than a year and a lower priced bagless clocks its demise at 18 months. I lent them my miele canister for a couple of days to see if the teachers like it. Is a canister the best and if so which one? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
|
kelizabeth
Joined: Jan 7, 2008
Points: 2
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #3 Jan 8, 2008 12:48 am |
|
I greatly appreciate the information. I've been searching the internet for awhile trying to figure out the answer to our dilemma with very little luck Thankfully, I somehow I stumbled on to this website. I am going to take the advice of both responders. Again, thank you very much.
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #4 Jan 8, 2008 9:29 am |
|
kelizabeth, If nothing else, we aim to please. You're very welcome and good luck. Regards, Venson
|
Motorhead
Joined: Nov 2, 2007
Points: 409
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #8 Jan 8, 2008 3:31 pm |
|
I second Venson's suggestion of the Nilfisk canister, GREAT machine. I'm going to add that a Windsor upright would also be a fine choice. Both the Nilfisk and Windsor are fairly pricey machines, but the quality is outstanding.
Now if you cannot get either of those, my opinion would be to stick to a clean-air (where the dirt does *not* pass through the fan) commercial upright that uses disposable bags. There are many out there at different (reasonable) price ranges; Panasonic, Simplicity, and Riccar commercials to name a few. Something bagless or direct-air (where the dirt does pass through the fan) would definitely not be a good choice if the machine is going to be picking up large amounts of sand. While the Sanitaire, Koblenz, and Royal uprights are great machines, they are direct-air so they would not be good in your situation. While it is true that the Royal has a metal fan (and has been "tested" on various objects including sand), the sand will still put wear on the fan and fan chamber over a period of time. No doubt that is what killed your Oreck after 18 months.
|
"There is no BEST or PERFECT vacuum cleaner"
"Take care of your vacuum, then your vacuum will take care of you"
Joined: Dec 1, 2004
Points: 1683
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #9 Jan 8, 2008 5:05 pm |
|
Reggie; The above mentioned machines that I listed will do just fine. The worst one will be the Sanitaire, but like I said, it can be repaired quickly and inexpensively. The clean air uprights are not going do as well as the "fan-first" uprights w/sand. The original poster is concerned w/sand. I believe that the Nilfisk is not needed in this situation. It is too expensive for a Co-op. Replacement parts/supplies are expensive also.
This message was modified Jan 8, 2008 by Mike_W
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #10 Jan 9, 2008 7:00 am |
|
SInce we seem to be expressing a divergence of opinions on vacuum recommendations, I'd like to provide mine too. I live in the desert. Lots and lots of sand. All over. I change air cleaners in my vehicles every 3 months and they are garaged. I have an English yellow lab who sheds year round. Two grand daughters just one mile away ages 1 and 3. and they visit often. My home is a little more than 1500 square feet with 75% ceramic tile floor and 25 % wool carpet. In April 2007, I bought an ORECK XL Classic, at the request of my dear Wife. It performs so well, I gifted one to my daughter (over 3000 square feet home) and Mother-in-law. Daughter lives in the desert too. We all use and love the ORECK's. In the time that I've owned the ORECK, I replaced the belt after 8 months and it's on the 3rd paper bag. The ORECK is a daily user in my home. I also own and use a HOOVER WT Supreme. The HOOVER does a better job on the carpets for cleaning and grooming than the ORECK. But ORECK is a respectable second. ORECK has the added benefit of going easily from the floors to carpets to area rugs quickly and easily. And the ORECK doesn't have/need a brush roll shut off to do it. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jan 9, 2008 by CarmineD
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #11 Jan 9, 2008 2:47 pm |
|
Hi Mike,My first choice, the Nilfisk GD 930 can be found for as low as the $400 range with a little looking. It's built-in secondary filtration set-up is not only good but provides a larger than uaual area for the job . As well, yes the standard bags may be a bit pricier than most but do hold 15 litres. It should take a while for bag changes. As I have mentioned, I have owned two Nilfisks, the GS 80 and 90 which I still have, and have maintained them well without going broke. I'll also add that the more expensive GM 80 can be used without bags for those inclined. Last point, kelizabeth did not mention the type of flooring used in the area they're taking care of and if it is carpeted, it's probaly low-pile commercial type. I can't imagine that high or even medium mile carpeting would be put into use in an area where there are children in classroom setting. Lots of dirt, spills, etc. That said, if indeed there's carpet of teh type I've mentioned, a decent canister will suffice for the job. I was careful in my mention of that and I know that because I've done that. I usually give careful thought when I give advice because I can't afford to be known for popping off whatever's at the top of my head. Best, Venson
This message was modified Jan 9, 2008 by Venson
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #12 Jan 9, 2008 5:56 pm |
|
In the same vein as Venson's Nilfisk pick, I might suggest going to the following Web Site and researching this make and their tank type models. They may be appropriate and worthy for your cleaning requirements. http://www.metrovacworld.com/Shopping/product.asp?catalog_name=metrovac&product_id=professionals Made in the USA by a family business since 1939, the Metro vacuums are all steel and built to last. Plenty of suction power and UL approved. As little as 8 pounds with 4 horsepower, reusable cloth bag/paper filter bags optional, 20 foot cord, and 7 attachments including a turbo-driven powerhead with rotating brushes. About $250 retail. 5 bags cost about $9.00. It is made for commercial applications with a 5 year warranty. Several years back, I recommended this brand and a similar model (straight suction) to an inquirer on a now defunct vacuum Forum. Her needs were for an animal shelter and hospital. She also had the added requirement that it be usable as a blower to dry pet hair after washing. This brand does. In fact, I had one and gifted it to the animal shelter/hospital. I presume the recommendation and gift were good. We have been friends ever since. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jan 9, 2008 by CarmineD
|
|
|