Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
kelizabeth
Joined: Jan 7, 2008
Points: 2
|
|
sand
Original Message Jan 7, 2008 9:25 pm |
|
I am trying to help my son's preschool (we're a co-op) select the best vacuum. Everyday lots and lots and lots of sand makes its way into our classroom. The sand has laid to rest an expensive Oreck in less than a year and a lower priced bagless clocks its demise at 18 months. I lent them my miele canister for a couple of days to see if the teachers like it. Is a canister the best and if so which one? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #2 Jan 8, 2008 12:21 am |
|
Hi kelizabeth, About what size is your pre-school and what's on the floor? If the floor area is of considerable size and bare or covered with low, dense pile carpet -- basically the only carpet solution in this case -- a more commercially oriented canister would be the deal. The name that comes to mind for me is Nilsfisk. The U.S. branch of the company provides at least two quiet running canisters, the GM 80 and the GD 930, that offer generous bag size. Either should be great for bare floors and low pile carpet without aid of a power nozzle. Due to the impressive dust capacity you can can clean a good while before a bag change is called for. That might also prove a boon as the vacuum could also be used for cleaning tasks in other common areas thus making the purchase even more worthwhile. I've owned the GS 80 and now own the GS 90 -- now out of manufacture -- and can highly praise the brand by way of hands-on experience. I also suggest these two canisters as they are mostly metal, pretty durable yet not burdensome to carry when necessary. Replacements parts if needed are usually just a phone call away. I'd prefer Nilfisk over the usual hosehold vacuum, even Miele which is certainly good but meant for regular housekeeping. I've owned. The two links below will give you opportunity to get a general idea of what either model is like. GM 80 -- http://www.nilfiskcfm.com/ProductDetail.aspx?m=1 GD 930 -- http://www.nilfiskcfm.com/ProductDetail.aspx?m=15 Nilfisk, like Miele, can be pricey. If at some point you're inclined to buy this brand, or any other brand for that matter, be sure run a search for the model you have in mind at www.pricegrabber.com. It offers an opportunity to seek out best price. Hope that helps, Venson
|
kelizabeth
Joined: Jan 7, 2008
Points: 2
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #3 Jan 8, 2008 12:48 am |
|
I greatly appreciate the information. I've been searching the internet for awhile trying to figure out the answer to our dilemma with very little luck Thankfully, I somehow I stumbled on to this website. I am going to take the advice of both responders. Again, thank you very much.
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #4 Jan 8, 2008 9:29 am |
|
kelizabeth, If nothing else, we aim to please. You're very welcome and good luck. Regards, Venson
|
Motorhead
Joined: Nov 2, 2007
Points: 409
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #8 Jan 8, 2008 3:31 pm |
|
I second Venson's suggestion of the Nilfisk canister, GREAT machine. I'm going to add that a Windsor upright would also be a fine choice. Both the Nilfisk and Windsor are fairly pricey machines, but the quality is outstanding.
Now if you cannot get either of those, my opinion would be to stick to a clean-air (where the dirt does *not* pass through the fan) commercial upright that uses disposable bags. There are many out there at different (reasonable) price ranges; Panasonic, Simplicity, and Riccar commercials to name a few. Something bagless or direct-air (where the dirt does pass through the fan) would definitely not be a good choice if the machine is going to be picking up large amounts of sand. While the Sanitaire, Koblenz, and Royal uprights are great machines, they are direct-air so they would not be good in your situation. While it is true that the Royal has a metal fan (and has been "tested" on various objects including sand), the sand will still put wear on the fan and fan chamber over a period of time. No doubt that is what killed your Oreck after 18 months.
|
"There is no BEST or PERFECT vacuum cleaner"
"Take care of your vacuum, then your vacuum will take care of you"
Joined: Dec 1, 2004
Points: 1683
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #9 Jan 8, 2008 5:05 pm |
|
Reggie; The above mentioned machines that I listed will do just fine. The worst one will be the Sanitaire, but like I said, it can be repaired quickly and inexpensively. The clean air uprights are not going do as well as the "fan-first" uprights w/sand. The original poster is concerned w/sand. I believe that the Nilfisk is not needed in this situation. It is too expensive for a Co-op. Replacement parts/supplies are expensive also.
This message was modified Jan 8, 2008 by Mike_W
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: sand
Reply #10 Jan 9, 2008 7:00 am |
|
SInce we seem to be expressing a divergence of opinions on vacuum recommendations, I'd like to provide mine too. I live in the desert. Lots and lots of sand. All over. I change air cleaners in my vehicles every 3 months and they are garaged. I have an English yellow lab who sheds year round. Two grand daughters just one mile away ages 1 and 3. and they visit often. My home is a little more than 1500 square feet with 75% ceramic tile floor and 25 % wool carpet. In April 2007, I bought an ORECK XL Classic, at the request of my dear Wife. It performs so well, I gifted one to my daughter (over 3000 square feet home) and Mother-in-law. Daughter lives in the desert too. We all use and love the ORECK's. In the time that I've owned the ORECK, I replaced the belt after 8 months and it's on the 3rd paper bag. The ORECK is a daily user in my home. I also own and use a HOOVER WT Supreme. The HOOVER does a better job on the carpets for cleaning and grooming than the ORECK. But ORECK is a respectable second. ORECK has the added benefit of going easily from the floors to carpets to area rugs quickly and easily. And the ORECK doesn't have/need a brush roll shut off to do it. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jan 9, 2008 by CarmineD
|
|
|