Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions

I am in search of a good lawnmower. I want a mower that will bag as well as mulch, prefer electric start, and rear wheel drive. I cant decide on a Honda, Huskavarna AWD, troy built , or toro. I have a hill that is about 30 degrees. I need it to mulch as well as bag well to suck up and multch leaves. Any suggestions. The husky has a Honda engine I'm leaning that way but Honda has the best warranty.

MN_Runner wrote:

+1 There's no need for a hydro on a lawnmower. Get something you can fix rather than just replace very expensive parts.
A quick google on the HRX217HYA showed the transmission was available only as a unit (no individual parts) and was $200 and two weeks to ship at one place, out of stock at two others.

One of the local repair shops mentioned about the high costs of replacing cables on Honda lawnmower.  The cables seems to be a frequent problem for these mowers, not sure why.  Does anybody know if this is true?  Robert Coats provided some costs for transmission parts, but make sure you take into account of the labor costs for the repairs too.

As Robert Coats mentioned about the Honda Smart Drive being a slipping belt clutch, this seems to be the same as Toro Personal Pace drive.  It is very simple and effective.  The only difference between the Honda Smart Drive and Personal Pace is the user interface.  If the drive system goes bad, just swap out the belt and make some adjustments.  I have the Toro Super Recycler and it's been working fine, very simple and intuitive to use. 

I don't think the hydrostatic trans on a walkbehind mower is really needed or an advantage.  Honda touts this as a cruise control, which doesn't really match my mowing style.  I am never in a cruise control mode, I am constantly varying my speed as there are lot of trimming near edges, making lots of turns.  For me, having to constantly fiddle with the speed lever on the hydro trans will become quite annoying.  I have hydro trans on my Honda snowblower which I like a lot, but I do not want it on a walkbehind lawnmower.

One more thing, you will have to choose whether you want the mower to excel at bagging or mulching.  A lot of mowers advertised as being able to both mulch or bag, or a combination of (Honda clip director).  One mower deck and blade cannot excel at both bagging and mulching.  My Toro Super Recycler is very good at mulching, but very pathetic at bagging performance.  This is even after changing to a high lift cutting blade.  The deck design is too shallow and the internal baffles doesn't create much of a vacuum. 

aa335 wrote:

It is costly because you have to take a bit of parts off to get to the cable.  It is not the cost of the cable but rather the labor to replace it.  I seen a few youtube videos and the job was a bit tricky and time consuming.  I agree that belt drive is more than good enough and hydro is too much.   30CC increase on HRX217 is noticeably better than 160CC on HRR216 models.

Thanks for the input guys I ended up with a HRX217.

bus708 wrote:
Great mower!  I really like mine.

bus708 wrote:
Are you going through OPE acquisition syndrome?  I know exactly how you feel.