Abby’s Guide > Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) > Discussions > While I wait for the snow, what about the fuel?
Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions |
|
JoelKlein
I wonder how a 2021 snow blower will look like...
Joined: Sep 26, 2011
Points: 74
![]()
|
 |
While I wait for the snow, what about the fuel?
Original Message Dec 25, 2011 9:50 am |
|
Happy holidays every one! ... bought the toro 1028 OXE back in October, right after the very first early snow storm. Was not able to try it in snow... I added the startron stabilizer And filled up the tank with 93 octane. I tested the new baby, showed off without spinning augers... But now it's a long time unused. My question is: is it okay for the fuel to sit in the carb for such a long time? Thanks!
This message was modified Dec 25, 2011 by JoelKlein
Toro 1028 OXE
|
Intruder
Joined: Sep 29, 2011
Points: 11
![]()
|
 |
Re: While I wait for the snow, what about the fuel?
Reply #22 Dec 26, 2011 3:21 pm |
|
Just to make sure we differentiate..... A car may or may not have computer adjusted timing, to maximize performance to the octane rating. Now I seriously doubt my SB has a computer chip in it  ... correct me if I'm wrong... so using the recommended octane is highly recommended....... |
mml4
Snow is good,
Deep snow is better!
Joined: Dec 31, 2003
Points: 544
![]()
|
|
|
Re: While I wait for the snow, what about the fuel?
Reply #24 Dec 26, 2011 5:12 pm |
|
I use 87 in my 4 stroke ope and 91 in my 2 strokes because the Echo dealer told me to do it 10 years ago when I bought my blower and string trimmer. This was about the time the fuel additive package went from MTBE to alcohol. I haven't had a problem but I may not have experienced any with regular so who knows. The difference in $ for the amount of 2 stroke i use is negligible. I also own an FJ cruiser (2007) which suggested premium grade in the owners manual. I can report that when i tried 87 the fuel mileage dropped by about 2mpg. When I went back to 91 the mileage went back up. Marc
SnapperV210P,Toro22177,TroyBilt42010Snowthrower,Craftsman Shredder,American Turbo Pressure Washer HondaGX200,Stihl011Saw,EchoPas260Trimmer Edger,EchoPB602Blower,EchoHCR150Hedge Clipper
|
FrankMA
Location: Merrimack Valley/Northeastern Mass
Joined: Jul 1, 2010
Points: 587
![]()
|
|
|
Re: While I wait for the snow, what about the fuel?
Reply #25 Dec 26, 2011 5:30 pm |
|
I agree 100%. But the Manuel states it needs gas from a GOOD gas station. What in world does it mean? I would guess they mean Shell, Mobil, Sunoco, etc... as corporate policy would most likely set standards to ensure a high quality product is maintained and delivered.
Toro Wheel Horse 522xi GT, Honda HS928TA, Honda HS621AS, Honda HS520A, Toro CCR3000 (work in progress), Honda HS624WA (sold 08/23/2010), Stihl BR550 Backpack Blower, Stihl MS250, McCulloch MS1635, Honda EM6500SX Generator
|
JoelKlein
I wonder how a 2021 snow blower will look like...
Joined: Sep 26, 2011
Points: 74
![]()
|
|
|
Re: While I wait for the snow, what about the fuel?
Reply #29 Dec 26, 2011 8:00 pm |
|
Injectors, air cleaners and headers will do nothing to increase compression ratios.
Higher octane fuels can help hp when the if the ecu can advance the timing by helping the engine not have pre-ignition or ping thus increasing hp a bit.
Most engines will not see any difference in performance or gas milage using high octane fuel. In fact a low compression engine (8:1)will probably run worse on high octane gas.
According to you. High octane will make the engine worse. Why? And how? Pls explain. Thanks
This message was modified Dec 26, 2011 by JoelKlein
Toro 1028 OXE
|
niper99
Location: London Ont
Joined: Dec 2, 2007
Points: 354
![]()
|
|
|
Re: While I wait for the snow, what about the fuel?
Reply #31 Dec 26, 2011 9:34 pm |
|
Why so much obsession over fuel?
Thirty days and it's going bad? I'd believe that if it's left out in the open in a water pail.
I have gas in containers out at my camp that sits for six month and often eight months without ever having a problem with it. Keep it in an air tight container and it will be fine for months on end without fuel stabilizer. Particularly in cold weather. Even if it's left in the fuel tank of a machine it's good for months.
I've got untreated gasoline sitting in the fuel tank of the B&S engine on my Simplicity snow blower that been in there since the beginning of November. That's almost two months already. Two pumps on the primer, one pull of the cord, engine fired right up and runs as per usual, great.
Waaaaay too much anxiety about fuel and necessity for bogus stabilizers. If you want to eliminate your fuel problems, it starts by ensuring you're getting clean gasoline at the pump. Every time I've encountered a fuel issue it's from freshly purchased contaminated gas. Never had a problem, ever, from fuel that's been sitting in a fuel tank or container for a few months.
In my shop it would be safe to say that at least 50% of all "No Starts" that come into the shop every year are from STALE FUEL... Thats why u should 100% run stabilizer in your fuel.... and at the cost of stabilizer $1.50 / 10L of gas, makes for pretty cheap insurance...
As far as "Getting BAD Gas" lve been in business for Ten years this year and service approx 300 machines every year and i RARELY come across "BAD GAS" maybe twice in my Ten years have i even seen it...so its extremely unlikely u will get bad gas... what is more likely is stale fuel... For example before i started using stabilizer about 6 years ago i would tune up customers snowblowers in the spring or even mid to late october and they wouldn't start them till the first snow in january and i would get a call saying it wont start...so i'd drive out to there place to find out that the fuel has gone stale.. drian the old fuel out put new in and it starts right up...so after about 15 calls in one season i started using stabilizer and lve never had a problem since. l use 87 octane fuel, l have tried 94 octane but didn't see any benifit from using the higher octane, so why pay 94 when 87 does the same job without any drawbacks..
This message was modified Dec 26, 2011 by niper99
|
|
|
