Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions

Hello!

This is my first post and I would appreciate any thoughts you might have based on your experience with two-stage blowers.

We built a house two years ago that has a concrete driveway (about 120' long) with an exposed aggregate border. The aggregate also forms the walkways for all three front entry doors and the garage apron. I have been using a Toro single stage for the last two years and have struggled at times with the amount of snow we receive here. We had over 100" last year and I felt every bit of that. We live in a lake effect snow belt so get blasted quite regularly. Given the direction of the prevailing winds the snow accumulates around our three car garage and entry areas and can be as high as 18" or more. I find with the single stage Toro that I am reblowing the snow repeatedly (as the turnaround area is longer than the snow can be blown) just to get it cleared.

After two years of this I've decided that a two-stage would be a better answer to this problem. However, my initial forays into local dealers have turned up several issues. First of all, we have an exceptionally nice (expensive) concrete driveway and several dealers have warned me that the skid shoes on a two-stage blower can scratch the driveway with repeated use. They've also indicated that the scraper blade could be a problem with the exposed aggregate. I've been abble to find a polycarbonate alternative for Ariens but have had no success with the scraper blade. As yet, I have been unable to locate non-scratch skid shoes or scraper for the Simplicity I'm interested in.

I am now also concerned with about a two-stage from a clearance perspective. If I set the blade too high (to avoid scraping) I could be leaving a significant residue on the blown surfaces. This was not an issue with the single stage Toro. This would not normally be a problem but I sold my SUV this year in favor of a rear wheel drive car. While I've ordered winter tires and rims, I'm concerned that leaving too much snow on the driveway will result in a slippery surface or ice buildup that could become problematic. My driveway has a 15 degree slope that adds to the problem. One dealer suggested that I use salt to eliminate the remainder but I believe the landscaping around the driveway would be adversely affected by this solution.

I guess I'm interested in two things. First, does a two-stage blower leave scratch marks on a concrete driveway? (from the skid shoes and/or scraper) And second, how does a two-stage handle a significant amount of exposed aggregate? Is the only solution raising the blade to a level where a significant amount of snow is left behind?

I was really looking forward to a two-stage blower but now am not so sure. The problems they impose may be larger that the challenges I currently experience with the single stage Toro.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts and assistance.

PS I skimmed all threads in the forum back to 2005 and could not find an answer.

longboat wrote:
Thanks for that tidbit of information.  I'm machining my own poly skids on the Bridgeport for the Honda and I made it wider and larger than Arien's version.  We'll see how it performs as far as tracking and riding up the snow.  I can always fine tune the shape of the skid's contact area after some snow trials.

How did your Ariens plastic skids hold up in terms of wear?  I can only guess at this point if it's riding on concrete and brick without a layer of snow to act as lubrication, it will wear out quick.

rafdog wrote:
I looked into these and would have bought a set if they fit my CC SWE930. But the bolt centers are 4-1/2". Too far for the product. Too bad. I would have liked to try them.

JimmyM wrote:

You may want to double check that: https://sites.google.com/site/rollerskid/

4. Fits machines with 2-3/4" and 3" bolt centers

The Roller-Skid fits machines with both 2-3/4" (MTD, Troy-Bilt, etc.) and 3" (Ariens, Toro, John Deere, Craftsman, etc.) bolt centers.

DavidNJ wrote:
I already measured the bolt distance. It's 4-1/2 inches.

aa335 wrote:

Sorry for the slow reply...

The plastic skids held up surprisingly well.  Not sure if I'll keep using them or try going back to the thin metal stock units.  One variable that fogs the picture a bit is that I installed a cab at the same time that I installed the skids, so the cab may have taken some weight off the bucket; however, even lifting up on the handlebars didn't seem to help keep the plastic skids from climbing up on the snow.  Maybe for the next snowfall or two, I'll try a plastic one on one side and a stock metal one on the other side to better evaluate - will post if I find any definite conclusions.

An example of the handlebar design issue.

It's not the handlebars, but the larger footprint of the polyethylene skids riding up on the snow. He did say that lifting up on the handle bars to negate the weight of the snow cab did not help.

....deleted double post...

"however, even lifting up on the handlebars didn't seem to help keep the plastic skids from climbing up on the snow."

Its the handlebars. The correct design for moving snow--in contrast to moving the snow blower when not plowing--lets you press down on the grips and the scoops stays planted. It is a matter of geometry. On the Husqvarna Crown (I didn't try the base model) I could press with my weight on the grips and the nose stayed down. It was a 24", less than 50# on the nose.

longboat wrote:

No problem. Better late than never. Like I said before, I've changed the shape of my poly skids because I suspect my skid design may ride up on snow more readily because of the larger footprint, and potentially wander more. I suppose it's a tradeoff to lessen the pounds per square inch loading on concrete/pavers to prevent damage to the surfaces. Your information is helpful for me to have somewhat of a basis to dial in the shape. Thanks. Looking forward to hearing from you with new findings.