Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
tbstbs
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
Points: 9
|
|
Riccar RSL 5 @ $650 or Oreck Pilot @ $599 ?
Original Message Aug 12, 2010 9:51 am |
|
I have been reading the various forums here this morning and they are so helpful. I know what I don't want, so now I am having difficulty deciding between what appear to be 2 very good machines. After pushing several of the previously mentioned machines around in the store, I might have a slight prefernce for the Riccar. I like the fact that it won't need belts, and will turn off when I accidently suck up something I shouldn't. I also prefer the hand held vac that comes with the Riccar, but I think that may be mostly cosmetic. I believe I would choose the Pilot over the Gold, but I did not consider or really know about the Edge I see talked about on here. When it comes to the Oreck, it is hard to overlook the great 6 or 10+ year service plan, not to mention the 30 day money back guarantee. Now, I am just going around and around in circles. Does anyone here have some information that might help me move on?
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Riccar RSL 5 @ $650 or Oreck Pilot @ $599 ?
Reply #28 Aug 15, 2010 1:41 pm |
|
petal....Is there a spell check on here?
Yes....pedal.
Carmine D. PS: The technical industry term is "handle release."
This message was modified Aug 15, 2010 by CarmineD
|
tbstbs
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
Points: 9
|
|
Re: Riccar RSL 5 @ $650 or Oreck Pilot @ $599 ?
Reply #29 Aug 15, 2010 5:32 pm |
|
Yes....pedal. Carmine D. PS: The technical industry term is "handle release." phhht!
|
Actionvac
Joined: Oct 22, 2008
Points: 80
|
|
Re: Riccar RSL 5 @ $650 or Oreck Pilot @ $599 ?
Reply #32 Aug 16, 2010 10:10 am |
|
I agree that CR best serves as a tool , not a Bible. However, the same organization rated your new Pilot. as "very good" on carpet and for pet hair, "excellent" in regard to bare floor cleaning and emissions and also "excellent" for handling. Are they off the mark now? The Boss is rated as"fair" for handling. I don't blame that on CR. Maybe you missed the fine print stating that -- Overall, this is a very good upright vacuum that excelled at cleaning bare floors and picking up pet hair. It was also excellent at keeping its emissions low. It was fairly hard to handle. Venson Consumer reports is in the subsription magazine business, they are hardly experts at anything but that
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Riccar RSL 5 @ $650 or Oreck Pilot @ $599 ?
Reply #33 Aug 16, 2010 11:19 am |
|
Consumer reports is in the subsription magazine business, they are hardly experts at anything but that
So show me. I strongly disagree as CR is a tried and true shopping tool that has kept me a happy camper for years. My first use of it was back in the "stereo age" -- the mid-70s -- when I bought a pair of Marantz audio speakers it recommended -- without audition. They proved to be wonderful but were given to a friend when I headed off to Europe 20 years ago. He still has them.
However, I in no way recommend the same for others. Inform yourselves to what is available and suitable for your purpose and use. Few salespersons show helpfulness in that area and neither are manufacturers. So where do I go? Do I knock on all the doors up and down my block to find out what food mixer they like or don't like when I need one? Do I stop and ask every driver I see just why they chose their particular automobile? Not likely. Any vacuums that I have bought by way of CR have been what they were claimed BUT I'd read the whole text per item AND thought about it. The problem is that many of us are not willing to make trade-offs or are too fast to jump to buy due to one rating issue. Rating says, "Excellent for carpets," "Highest suction of all tested," and someone goes running off to store for it. Ratings like "good" indicating a machine that may well prove more than satisfactory for many I think get passed by. High-end Miele S7 uprights did get great scores for everything except handling. CR didn't influence this buy as I got mine well before testing was done but I'm happy although that does not mean that someone else should be equally as pleased as I. As well, I have seldom seen a Miele canister canister rate above good for carpet cleaning but I have one and am happy with it too. But it's not all about premium priced vacs. The el-cheapo Hoover Tempo continues to bring in good scores and is an easily affordable, worthwhile buy. That kind of information I also thank CR for. As for durability, in reality feel CR tests can show no more than I can learn at home. There's no way of knowing what your vacuum's made of until after a couple of years of bangs and knocks plus the degradation of plasticizers have occured. As well, common sense has never allowed me to expect much from bargain models and to take eveyday of use as a blessing -- not a given. In 1959 a "deluxe" model vacuum that cleaned well and was durable could be had for $90.00. You may have to pay as much as ten times that for a current equivalent to meet the same expectations. But should everyone go out and buy 900 buck vacuums. Heck no! They should however seek to get the best in their price bracket. My feeling, which you are surely free to take or leave, is that CR has been a help to lots of shoppers for all sorts of items and services and if not it would have run out of subscribers by now. Thus it can be its own lawyer and plad its case by way of demand. Until it has been proved to falsify tests and cater to manufacture and business interests, I'll continue to use it. Venson
|
|
|