Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
Trebor
Joined: Jan 16, 2009
Points: 321
|
|
New Oreck vacuums
Original Message May 5, 2010 5:19 pm |
|
Today I fortuitously stopped at the local Oreck dealer.
Mike, the owner of several Oreck franchises and a few multi-brand stores had brought his new Edge upright from home, as stock had not arrived yet.
It has a more powerful motor, with a true floating head. LED lights, infinite speed control AND and on-board stretch hose with a permanently attached telescopic crevice tool that is automatically active when the handle is in the upright position. It lacks the Pilot's pivot head and the Halo's germ killing light. A model incorporating all three features is under development. It is still easy to push, although it weighs 10 lb and requires a bit more effort than previous models.
There is a commercial OBT upright made by Stein (Sebo) that is very nice at only 450.00. Oreck WILL be offering a bagless upright, but dealer participation is optional. The new canister is color matched to the Edge and designed to be leaned on as the user vacuums stairs. Odd looking bare floor/crevice tool, no swivel neck. The bristles fold in to form the crevice tool, and the wand is inserted into a neck that curves more than 60 and less than 90 degrees, much like the OLD bare floor tools made of wood with the metal neck screwed on. A turbo tool is included and a dusting brush.
A cute little bagless canister is available for 49.99 Oreck has increased market share and has 89% brand recognition as a vacuum cleaner. They have become #1in air purifier sales. (Mike did not say if that was dollar volume, or units or both.
The price of the Edge and matching canister will be about 750.00
Oreck is still marketing, still developing product, and still building a loyal customer base.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: New Oreck vacuums
Reply #135 Jun 9, 2010 7:20 pm |
|
My sentiments exactly...........for dumb dyson and Sir James. Who in their right mind and pocket book would spend $550 on a weighty, ball wheeled, Malaysian contractor made, mediocre performing, over hyped/over hawked vacuum? Or spend $300 on a 10 inch fan? Or spend $1,400 on an electric hand dryer. Or spend $200 on a ball barrow? Or spend $5,000 on a contra rotating washer? Or $12 on a small package of dysolv rug cleaner that doesn't remove stains? History speaks for itself. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Or as Abraham Lincoln said: You can fool some of the people all of the time; all of the people some of the time; but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. There are alot of things one can say about his favorite hero's innovative product plunders. But, the honest thing to say is that they were incredibly bad ideas and he/company got it wrong [over and over again]. Carmine D. By eliminating (filtering out) the competing manufacturers to Dyson and their representatives (competing small time brick and mortar dealers) and eliminating the group that's not happy with themselves and their lack of real-accomplishments... then it turns out, Sir James has very few critics here in the US and UK - indeed.
This message was modified Jun 9, 2010 by DysonInventsBig
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: New Oreck vacuums
Reply #137 Jun 9, 2010 10:39 pm |
|
Here's a news flash you missed. ORECK increased market share in 2009 IN UNITS, which is the way the vacuum industry in the USA measures sales, and is poised to do so again in 2010 according to Trebor and Procare in their recent posts. This in the worse economic recession and worse record of consumer spending since the 1930's. How's that for cleaning up in hard times. Carmine D.
IF Oreck increased MS it was due to reduced pricing in Oreck stores and distribution in Big Box stores. I feel certain that Oreck sales to BB stores are low profit for Oreck. Combine that with reduced pricing in Oreck stores. Increased unit sales does not always contribute to the profit line. Give me the profits you can have the boxes.
I am familiar with Oreck's ability to clean up. I am not impressed.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: New Oreck vacuums
Reply #138 Jun 9, 2010 11:01 pm |
|
Nothing like reading a manual to know exactly how well a product performs that you never saw in person and never used. CR testers actually buy, use, and test products before evaluating and expressing opinions. Big waste of time and money. You need only read between the lines to know. Amazing. Did you earn a BS or BA for mastering such a skill? Or are you self-taught? Perhaps with a mentor? Sir James? Do tell us your secret of success. Inquiring minds want to know. Carmine D. So you’re saying the $550 Oreck is not a colossal innovative failure (as advertised), but instead (perhaps) a corporate ‘secret weapon’ packed full with life-changing, industry-changing innovations. And these innovations have been intentionally omitted from the Oreck marketing. I’ve got the time... we’ll see. Hilarious!
|
"There is no BEST or PERFECT vacuum cleaner"
"Take care of your vacuum, then your vacuum will take care of you"
Joined: Dec 1, 2004
Points: 1683
|
|
Re: New Oreck vacuums
Reply #139 Jun 10, 2010 1:11 am |
|
Well the first link shows a very surpremely quiet Oreck! Ive never quite heard one that quiet: Im very impressed.
However the next one from the "android phone," gives a lot of noise. Which one is to be believed?? The two links are not good examples for good sound quality. The second video has distorted sound. I really like the ORECK Edge. It is alot different from the other "8lbs." that have been marketed, from ORECK. The Edge is not loud like the other ORECKS. It sounds more like the HOOVER Platinum bagged upright. If you look at the Edge, you will see that the company studied the HOOVER quite a bit. They have the large back wheels, like HOOVER, and notice the outer bag. The outer bag has the same feel and look at the HOOVER. Even the top of the bag has the same shape as the top of the HOOVER Platinum. The attached hose does not have that much power, but I expected that. The hose w/telescopic crevice tool would do fine for picking up light debris like crumbs. Don't expect to clean the family automobile w/it. The bristles are stiff and aggressive, unlike other models. The vacuum cleaner really lifts the carpet pile as it crawls across the carpeting. The upright has a smaller bag than the other ORECK "8lbs.", but the bag prices are the same. The Edge comes w/a completely different portable vacuum cleaner that has alot of power. It has a bigger "clothlike"/"HEPA" bag, which is located at the bottom of the machine. The user must release and remove the upper portion of the machine to gain access to the bag. The Edge should do well if people can afford the very high price. I will write up a full review of it later, as well as the LG and a few others that I have not gotten to yet.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: New Oreck vacuums
Reply #140 Jun 10, 2010 6:41 am |
|
IF Oreck increased MS it was due to reduced pricing in Oreck stores and distribution in Big Box stores. I feel certain that Oreck sales to BB stores are low profit for Oreck. Combine that with reduced pricing in Oreck stores. Increased unit sales does not always contribute to the profit line. Give me the profits you can have the boxes. I am familiar with Oreck's ability to clean up. I am not impressed.
When a company and its products increase market share in unit sales in the worse economic times in this country since the 1930's year over year, it's called successful marketing strategies in adverse economic times. You are not impressed with this cleaning up strategy because you obviously fail to comprehend the significance of it.
Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 10, 2010 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: New Oreck vacuums
Reply #141 Jun 10, 2010 6:48 am |
|
So you’re saying the $550 Oreck is not a colossal innovative failure (as advertised), but instead (perhaps) a corporate ‘secret weapon’ packed full with life-changing, industry-changing innovations. And these innovations have been intentionally omitted from the Oreck marketing. I’ve got the time... we’ll see. Hilarious! No, you said that. Others here said ORECK increased market share in units in 2009 and likely too in 2010, two of the worse economic years in this country since the 1930's. This should silence ORECK's critics, if they are honest with themselves. Increased unit sales, not self-spun unaudited company provided figures, holds the key to long term market success. If one comprehends this and obviously not all do. Especially in bad economic times, worldwide. [btw, what's the euro exchange now? Parity with the US dollar yet? Like it was in 2000?] Add to this sales success, ORECK launching several new vacuum and floorcare products to compete directly with so called industry leaders, like dyson and HOOVER, and you've got a formidable company. Not to mention also buying the rights to the halo UV-C technology/products which others in the industry, given first right of refusal, declined. Innovation comes in many forms and usually is overrated and overpriced. Year over year sales/product successes are more convincing to me than hyped diatribes about supposed innovation to solve contrived problems no one has.
Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 10, 2010 by CarmineD
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: New Oreck vacuums
Reply #143 Jun 10, 2010 6:14 pm |
|
When a company and its products increase market share in unit sales in the worse economic times in this country since the 1930's year over year, it's called successful marketing strategies in adverse economic times. You are not impressed with this cleaning up strategy because you obviously fail to comprehend the significance of it. Carmine D.
I assume you are comparing 2009 to 2008. Do you know how much they increased MS in 2009? They only had negative growth for the 3 years prior to 2006. Do you call those 3 years unsuccessful strategies?
I understand that when you sink to the bottom of a 10 ft. pool there is no significance to rising only 1 ft. Gotta get above the water line. Rocks (units) will not rise to the surface. Wood (cash) will rise to the top. Which would you grab? Remember ypu held to the Hoover rock and sunk.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: New Oreck vacuums
Reply #144 Jun 10, 2010 7:39 pm |
|
I assume you are comparing 2009 to 2008. Do you know how much they increased MS in 2009? They only had negative growth for the 3 years prior to 2006. Do you call those 3 years unsuccessful strategies? I understand that when you sink to the bottom of a 10 ft. pool there is no significance to rising only 1 ft. Gotta get above the water line. Rocks (units) will not rise to the surface. Wood (cash) will rise to the top. Which would you grab? Remember ypu held to the Hoover rock and sunk. 10 feet of water. Wow, you really make it easy. I thought for sure you would say at least one mile/5000 feet below water.
Answer is very simple. Even you could do it. Squat down in the bottom of the pool with bended knees. Push off the pool bottom with your legs and feet while using your hands and arms to pilot [as in ORECK] you to the top. Works every time if you are even quasi-coordinated. Look. In the last quarter of 2007, the time in which the BEST BUY store on the east coast that sells the largest quantity of dyson product told me year over year sales for dysons begun their decline, ORECK sales increased. While BB insiders tell me dyson sales continue to plummet since, several posters here tell us ORECK sales are continuing to rise year over year. Unlike the pool analogy, which required my help, figure out for yourself which is the winner today. Should be easy. Even for you. Carmine D.
|
|
|