Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
ArtieV1
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Points: 1
|
|
"What has dyson invented now?"
Original Message Oct 11, 2009 11:23 pm |
|
I received this "teaser email today: http://links.mkt2388.com/ctt?kn=1&m=2735925&r=MTgwOTM1MTgzMTcS1&b=0&j=NzgxMTAyODMS1&mt=1&rt=0 Anyone know what's up with this??
-=Art=-
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #81 Oct 15, 2009 4:30 pm |
|
DIB: I find his posts hilarious. I didn't realize that in this age and time some of the oldest and most legendary vacuum industry myths are still being circulated and believed. What's even more hilarious is that if I remember correctly he said he is/was a paid reviewer for vacuum products and worked for Which? Like they say: What have you been doing all your life?? So, DIB should we now add Consumer Reports to the anti-dyson conspiracy along with all the indies in the USA? Carmine D.
This message was modified Oct 15, 2009 by CarmineD
|
procare
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Points: 192
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #82 Oct 15, 2009 4:44 pm |
|
Carmine, Earlier you stated that the last cleaner gets more dirt. Ther have been a few instances that I let the owner have the last vacuuming and had a clean bag or bin and they hardly pulled anything. A few times customers said they vacuumed before I came had new bag or bin and wasn't getting anything. One was a two month old Dyson DC- 14 and one was a new Filter Queen and I really dug the dirt out and shocked the customers. Tri Star told a customer that they could clean the whole house and no one would pull anything behind them. When I went in to demo , they were still there and I beat him out. He tried everything in the book to show me and my trainee up but failed. He had a new man with him. Tried to sell her a new scratched unit and failed. Delivered a new machine next day. I told her and showed her what it would do and didn't cut the other man down. Hired the Tri Star trainee and trained him . Good honest salesman today. I tell people about the so called trick of the trade because I will always pull far more dirt after them . When I go to another area i ask them to go behind me They hardly pull anything. Procare
This message was modified Oct 15, 2009 by procare
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #84 Oct 15, 2009 5:31 pm |
|
Hello Procare: Your post about the Lux and letting dyson go last and getting hardly anything out coincides with Severus' post. A HOOVER up would pull more out going last than a dyson would pull out going last. Of course, as Severus says if you stay at it long enough with a dyson EVENTUALLY a DC14 would get some more out. Perhaps 14/15 passes. Maybe 27/28 passes back and forth. Maybe that's how dyson picks model numbers. But dyson's especially the models discontinued now are equipped with wimpy brush rolls [I mean bars]. James must have had a technological innovatively lazy hour when it came to the old style dyson brush bars. Carmine D. As you know I had a DC07 and a Hoover Fusion at thr same time. The Dyson beat it every time. The dirt was weighed on extremely accurate pharmacy scales.
The Orecks are embarrased to put a number on all but the XL21. It has to be run 21 times a week to get a bare minimum of dirt out of carpets. The others have to be used so many times they chose to elkiminate the number. XL = Xtremely Long time to vacuum.
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #85 Oct 15, 2009 5:34 pm |
|
SEVERUS: A very savvy poster here once wrote that the HOOVER uprights are the gold standard of carpet cleaning and grooming. Consumer Reports gets it right on this one. Carmine D. A not so savy poster also once told Hoover that Dyson would never sell. Look what it cost him.
|
M00seUK
Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #88 Oct 15, 2009 6:14 pm |
|
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #89 Oct 15, 2009 6:52 pm |
|
Hello Lucky1 I would never ever pay ORECK $300,000 for a franchise. I'd take the money and buy a building. Why be at the mercy of any brand and pay them for it. It doesn't make sense. If I want to be my own boss [and I that's largely the reason I went in the business], why would I ever buy a brand's franchise? I never signed a business contract with any vacuum brand maker in 42 years. I was an authorized sales and service dealer for 4 major vacuum brands. We did business based on an handshake, or we didn't do business. My store, my rules. If they didn't agree, I thanked them, and I showed them the door. Carmine D.
This message was modified Oct 15, 2009 by CarmineD
|
|
|