Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
ArtieV1
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Points: 1
|
|
"What has dyson invented now?"
Original Message Oct 11, 2009 11:23 pm |
|
I received this "teaser email today: http://links.mkt2388.com/ctt?kn=1&m=2735925&r=MTgwOTM1MTgzMTcS1&b=0&j=NzgxMTAyODMS1&mt=1&rt=0 Anyone know what's up with this??
-=Art=-
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #71 Oct 15, 2009 10:57 am |
|
ORECK had enough money to buy up halo after it failed. That was not trickery. That was cash. Wonder who'll be next? Carmine D.
The trickery is in the marketing. Build a vac for $50 or less and sell for $800. It will however perform almost as good as a $50 vacuum.
BTW, You tried to divert my comment because you know I spoke the truth.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #73 Oct 15, 2009 12:25 pm |
|
|
Severus
If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #78 Oct 15, 2009 2:18 pm |
|
Oh what a load of old shi*, Carmine! Do it on a hard floor and the Dyson will STILL pick up dirt left over by ANY bagged upright. In validated tests conducted by Consumer Reports, most Dysons weren't too impressive at removing dirt from carpets. While many Hoovers regularly get excellent scores for carpet cleaning (CR scores are: Excellent, Very Good, good, fair, poor), Dysons with few exceptions only get "good" scores. One notable exception is the new hard to push Dyson with air muscle technology. It actually scored "very good" (still below the standard set by the Hoover bagged Windtunnel and $60 Tempo). Given the same opportunity to remove dirt from the test rugs, the bagged Hoovers did a better job than the Dysons. If you did your test both ways, I believe the Hoover would pick up a lot more dirt that the Dyson missed than vice versa. That's not to say that your carpeting will be filthy if you have a Dyson. If you use your Dyson regularly and thoroughly, you can have clean carpeting.
The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable. The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: "What has dyson invented now?"
Reply #80 Oct 15, 2009 3:43 pm |
|
Oh what a load of old shi*, Carmine! Do it on a hard floor and the Dyson will STILL pick up dirt left over by ANY bagged upright. In validated tests conducted by Consumer Reports, most Dysons weren't too impressive at removing dirt from carpets. While many Hoovers regularly get excellent scores for carpet cleaning (CR scores are: Excellent, Very Good, good, fair, poor), Dysons with few exceptions only get "good" scores. One notable exception is the new hard to push Dyson with air muscle technology. It actually scored "very good" (still below the standard set by the Hoover bagged Windtunnel and $60 Tempo). Given the same opportunity to remove dirt from the test rugs, the bagged Hoovers did a better job than the Dysons.
If you did your test both ways, I believe the Hoover would pick up a lot more dirt that the Dyson missed than vice versa.
That's not to say that your carpeting will be filthy if you have a Dyson. If you use your Dyson regularly and thoroughly, you can have clean carpeting. VacuumUK, It seems Venson and Carmine don’t care much for your post. I do. FYI - Venson's buddies here are dealer[s] who's livelyhoods depends on selling bagged vacuums and the (often times) exclsive replacement bags (very expensive vacs and bags I might add). CR on vacuums is worthless (nearly): If you've read our CR debates here or looked critically how CR tests the lowly vacuum cleaner, bold faced refusal to discuss the benefits to Dyson-cyclonic’s, and their refusal to test real-world tests... you'll see CR is dirty and their tests and the goofs who run the testing as laughable. Heck, CR does not pay any federal or state taxes and it's still a financial looser. They only stay in business because of the millions "donated" every year by individuals who are not affiliated with any corporation. DIB Laughable? L - photo: CR showing their readers how uprights are difficult, limited, clumsy and somewhat dangerous to use at cleaning stairs. R - photo: Anyone with a 3rd grade or higher education showing how uprights can reach farther than canisters, are fast, simple and safer to use at cleaning stairs (onboard hose/wand made popular courtesy James Dyson).
This message was modified Oct 15, 2009 by DysonInventsBig
|
|
|