Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: NEW VAX LINE
Reply #6 Oct 2, 2009 8:32 am |
|
HS: Dyson prices are not just high. They are, as you said in the past, not worth the prices. Keep the free toilet shuffle. Dysons are no better than any of the other big box rip off store vacuum brands. Except for prices which are the highest. Dyson is made in malaysia, a third world country, by contract staff, who obtain the dyson contract by bidding on it with the lowest labor and overhead rates. Thievery, HS. ORECK is made in the USA with a network of 550 authorized ORECK stores nationwide to service/warranty ORECK products. If it is overpriced for performance, then you should consider the higher price as the same as paying extra for extended service plans. It's an insurance policy. You can identify with this concept. You paid extra for an ESP on your dyson. Or did you get a dyson refurb free? Besides, wouldn't you, like most all Americans, be willing to pay a little more for home grown American products to keep jobs here in the USA? Especially a company like ORECK with a brand name that has been in existence for almost 50 years in the USA. No, I forgot you just bought a HOOVER TTI knock off of ORECK, made in China, for $299, or was it $399? Carmine D. Where are those cheapie Hoovers made that you buy in the big box stores? How about that Fusion that failed to kill Dyson and destroy all your predictions?
I paid $19 for and extended warranty. Not $500 or more like on the XL21.
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: NEW VAX LINE
Reply #8 Oct 2, 2009 10:43 am |
|
Mexico and China HS. The difference is that they are worth the $54-$75 paid for their performance. My ORECK, made in the USA, costs $199 on sale without the giveaways. Bought 4 like it at the same price. Maybe you should be a better shopper/buyer for your vacuums. Carmine D. What difference does performance matter. Not made in the USA and not bought at an indy. You are still a hipocrite
I am a better shopper. I do not listen to biased opinions. Would rather make my purchase based on my needs. I only had to buy 1 Oreck to realize how poorly they perform. Now you have been through how many Hoovers and Orecks ?
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: NEW VAX LINE
Reply #10 Oct 2, 2009 12:47 pm |
|
HS: True to form. When you lose the argument on its merits, you resort to name calling. Carmine D.
I am not the one who criticizes bb stores and its products. THEN BUYS THE JUNK FROM THEM.
You said buy USA made products and then you by imports from those stores that you call rip offs. Yes. TRUE TO FORM for you.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: NEW VAX LINE
Reply #14 Oct 2, 2009 6:31 pm |
|
If I recall correctly, and its been awhile, the VAX X3 and X5, both pre-TTI ownership, used soft bristle full tuft brush rolls. I recall opining that this style of brush roll is more suited to Euro rugs and carpets than USA. The HEPA filter in these are lifetime like the other bagless brand. The price for the VAX HEPA is $25-$30. A feature that women find desirable is the scented filter liners for $8-$10 in 4 different fragrances. I liked the cord winder feature on them. While initially priced high, the prices came down precipitously, before the big box rip off stores culled them from their shelves. It will be interesting to see the new line post TTI takeover. I suspect the brush roll tufts will be a tad more agressive for better pick up and grooming on USA carpets. On a positive note, while these old VAX models are still available new at reasonable prices, I could not find any VAX X3 and X5 refurbs on the internet. None. Carmine D.
|
vacmanuk
Location: Scotland UK
Joined: May 31, 2009
Points: 1162
|
|
Re: NEW VAX LINE
Reply #15 Oct 2, 2009 7:33 pm |
|
Not quite. Actually, Vax's line up uses a copied system to the Dual Cyclone patent that Dyson's patent of has ran out so it is of no surprise that Vax and any of the other TTI industries owned outfits are all doing the same kinds of technology; even Hoover's Airvolution is similar to the Dual Cyclone on design. However whilst they may well be able to offer the same principle as Dyson, the fact still remains that the new claimed Vax system still demands owners to wash the filters much more than that of a Dyson owner and I've yet to experience ANY of the Vax uprights that are low on noise; their latest builds are not well made and the X3 series is a very old design. Whilst I never washed my Dyson filters, I admired the low cost of the DC01 in the first couple of years and didn't have to clean any filter shrouds - unlike those of the current Vax line ups. Put simply whilst it may be apparent that Vax have copied the Dual Cyclone idea, Dyson is about 10 years ahead with the latest cyclonic system that betters the Dual Cyclone idea (Root?). The X3 / X5 series appeared in the UK in 2004/5 under the Bosch brand (of which Bosch paid Vax for) (BUC11700) and as the Vax VX1 and VX3. I think it was then cosmetically altered and updated a little in 2007 when it went on sale in Australia before it came to the U.S late last year. Certainly I can recall when Vax in Australia featured the X series heavily. I used to have one for a short period and wasn't that impressed with it despite having a twin motor system/motored brush roll and a pesky reset button that had to be constantly re-jigged each time the motor belt slipped - that and the lousy elephant's trunk type short metal tube at the front which was always far too short for my liking. However Carmine whilst I agree that the brush rolls were softer I found they didn't pick up dirt on polymer carpets/thin loop pile. The current brush rolls are all manufactured to one standard where Vax is concerned; most of their UK line up is based on old Dirt Devil U.S models so the bristles are quite hard, Chinese made and against most of their prices in the UK, I used to order drive belts off EBay in the U.S for my older Vax uprights (Dirt Devil) which were far cheaper and more cost effective to purchase despite overseas waiting delivery times.
This message was modified Oct 2, 2009 by vacmanuk
|
|
|