Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Vacuum Museum
Reply #29 Sep 2, 2009 6:54 am |
|
DIB: You said here that dyson has to rise to the top tier ranks of CR to be a serious contender for mainstream USA buyers [ I paraphrased]. You were right, tho you have since taken it back or toned it down by impugning CR every time it holds dysons' performance to the fire. James chose the venue, big box stores. When he did, he/his staff should have known that his products would be in competition with big box brands much less expensive that know the CR drill and perform for the money.
Now that James can't get above the 10 spot with his $600 innovative vacuum, he needs a retreat. With big box stores [even HSN] shunning the latest dyson products, James has to play nice nice with the indy's. Gets in your craw doesn't it. Niche seller. Which isn't bad for the high prices. The best thing you and dyson can do is kiss up to the indy's and hope they bite. Carmine D.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: Vacuum Museum
Reply #30 Sep 2, 2009 10:35 am |
|
DIB: You said here that dyson has to rise to the top tier ranks of CR to be a serious contender for mainstream USA buyers [ I paraphrased]. You were right, tho you have since taken it back or toned it down by impugning CR every time it holds dysons' performance to the fire. James chose the venue, big box stores. When he did, he/his staff should have known that his products would be in competition with big box brands much less expensive that know the CR drill and perform for the money.
Now that James can't get above the 10 spot with his $600 innovative vacuum, he needs a retreat. With big box stores [even HSN] shunning the latest dyson products, James has to play nice nice with the indy's. Gets in your craw doesn't it. Niche seller. Which isn't bad for the high prices. The best thing you and dyson can do is kiss up to the indy's and hope they bite. Carmine D. Carmine, I like doing battle with you here (mostly) and want to encourage you to keep using “paraphrasing, I believe, I think, if my memory serves me, etc.” vice “you said” only. Many times you misquote me and it’s tiring, it’s not ideal for getting a responding post. So keep it up (only quote if you can produce my words and in context, and demonstrate the date of my posts). You recently posted (suggested) I did not like independents, which is false. I do indeed like independents, I loath the dishonest ones (there’s lots of em). Do you have a point? When we’re in a recession, people spend less. Pre-recession, Dyson did $1b - $1.5b annually. Not bad for a backyard inventor, eh. Perhaps Dyson should make a donation to the CR “can’t make it’s monthly nut fund” to insure a higher ranking/fair ranking. Indeed the pathetic, low-life, dishonest indie/s not making enough money off Dyson products (per item) is an issue. When Dyson reinvents the lowly vacuum cleaner, receives high reliability ratings, and then the bottom-feeder indie con bad-mouths the Dyson, ONLY so to make more money selling their exclusive and much higher margin (than Dyson) vacuums, is an issue. Even if Dyson “kissed up” to these indie’s (had Miele-like margins and bag/belt sales/service sales), these “victims” still cannot get past their jealousy of Dyson. Although, Dyson could get them into counseling or some other self-help program. - Maybe the dual-persona poster here could get some help too. DIB
This message was modified Sep 2, 2009 by DysonInventsBig
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Vacuum Museum
Reply #31 Sep 2, 2009 12:19 pm |
|
DIB: Here's the points. First, dishonest business people regardless of product/services don't stay in business very long especially in a bad times. Your mud slinging at all "dishonest indy's" is disengenuous. Name a few if they're out there. I'd like to know who they are. Second, with the waning dyson sales in big box stores, what's Sir James/dyson to do? Look around. The indy's are going great guns picking up the sales and service of all makes and models. So that's the route you/dyson have to go in the future. IF it's not too late. Make nice nice now, or they'll tell you to stick it where the sun don't shine. Now that you know the points, you can agree/disagree. But "can" the how great James art and your hero worship of him. He/dyson still can't get a handheld that works properly even at $270 plus $60 for attachments and he and 500 engineers have trying for 7 years. Maybe that's why he'll never be more than a back yard inventor. Carmine D.
|
Severus
If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397
|
|
Re: Vacuum Museum
Reply #33 Sep 2, 2009 12:37 pm |
|
Carmine,
I like doing battle with you here (mostly) and want to encourage you to keep using “paraphrasing, I believe, I think, if my memory serves me, etc.” vice “you said” only. Many times you misquote me and it’s tiring, it’s not ideal for getting a responding post. So keep it up (only quote if you can produce my words and in context, and demonstrate the date of my posts). You recently posted (suggested) I did not like independents, which is false. I do indeed like independents, I loath the dishonest ones (there’s lots of em).
Do you have a point? When we’re in a recession, people spend less. Pre-recession, Dyson did $1-$1.5 annually. Not bad for a backyard inventor, eh.
Perhaps Dyson should make a donation to the CR “can’t make it’s monthly nut fund” to insure a higher ranking/fair ranking.
Indeed the pathetic, low-life, dishonest indie/s not making enough money off Dyson products (per item) is an issue. When Dyson reinvents the lowly vacuum cleaner, receives high reliability ratings, and then the bottom-feeder indie con bad-mouths the Dyson, ONLY so to make more money selling their exclusive and much higher margin (than Dyson) vacuums, is an isue. Even if Dyson “kissed up” to these indie’s (had Miele-like margins and bag/belt sales/service sales), these “victims” still cannot get past their jealousy of Dyson. Although, Dyson could get them into counseling or some other self-help program. - Maybe the dual-persona poster here could get some help too.
DIB DIB,
Don't be such a sourpuss. Dyson should be congratulated for making the top 10* in CR. It is quite an accomplishment for the DC28. *Technically Dyson DC28 and the Kirby Sentria are tied with a score of 67/100 at #10 and #11, so the Dyson gets the 10 spot rather than the 11 presumably due to the Dyson name preceding Kirby in alphabetical order. Perhaps it's luck of the draw who knows. If you only care about ability to clean carpeting, the upright vacuums rated excellent on carpeting are: (#1)Hoover Windtunnell Anniversary, (#2) Hoover platinum bagged (at 13 pounds), (#4) the Hoover Tempo widepath, (#9) the Hoover Windtunel aniversary bagless, (#11) Kirby Sentria, (#13) Eureka boss 4D, (#16) Riccar Brilliance, and (#20) Riccar Supralite RSL4. Dyson needs to watch out. The new Hoover Platinum bagless scored the same overall as the Dyson DC17 animal for a much lower price and better performance on pet hair. In terms of bagless uprights, the Dyson is the 3rd highest bagless behind only Kenmore and Hoover . Note to Hardsell: The Royal Eminence model MRY9750 at $600 is rated #31 with 59 points.
The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable. The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking.
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Vacuum Museum
Reply #34 Sep 2, 2009 1:32 pm |
|
DIB, Don't be such a sourpuss. Dyson should be congratulated for making the top 10* in CR. It is quite an accomplishment for the DC28. *Technically Dyson DC28 and the Kirby Sentria are tied with a score of 67/100 at #10 and #11, so the Dyson gets the 10 spot rather than the 11 presumably due to the Dyson name preceding Kirby in alphabetical order. Perhaps it's luck of the draw who knows. If you only care about ability to clean carpeting, the upright vacuums rated excellent on carpeting are: (#1)Hoover Windtunnell Anniversary, (#2) Hoover platinum bagged (at 13 pounds), (#4) the Hoover Tempo widepath, (#9) the Hoover Windtunel aniversary bagless, (#11) Kirby Sentria, (#13) Eureka boss 4D, (#16) Riccar Brilliance, and (#20) Riccar Supralite RSL4. Dyson needs to watch out. The new Hoover Platinum bagless scored the same overall as the Dyson DC17 animal for a much lower price and better performance on pet hair. In terms of bagless uprights, the Dyson is the 3rd highest bagless behind only Kenmore and Hoover . Note to Hardsell: The Royal Eminence model MRY9750 at $600 is rated #31 with 59 points. What is CR thinking. The Royal is one of the best because i own it.
Seriously, It is an OK vacuum, however, I do not get a warm fuzzy feeling that it deep cleans. It does make the carpet look well groomed. Sounds like an Oreck doesn't it. I really liked my test drive of the Platinum bagged at Sears. I plan to purchase on this week for a test in the home, Sure wish I could sell the Kirby (and the Royal). I ain't parting with the Rainbow. Hopint that you have a good day. Mayve repair some Orecks.
|
Severus
If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397
|
|
Re: Vacuum Museum
Reply #36 Sep 2, 2009 4:19 pm |
|
What is CR thinking. The Royal is one of the best because i own it. Seriously, It is an OK vacuum, however, I do not get a warm fuzzy feeling that it deep cleans. It does make the carpet look well groomed. Sounds like an Oreck doesn't it. I really liked my test drive of the Platinum bagged at Sears. I plan to purchase on this week for a test in the home, Sure wish I could sell the Kirby (and the Royal). I ain't parting with the Rainbow. Hopint that you have a good day. Mayve repair some Orecks.
Hardsell,
Is it safe to assume that you think your Rainbow does a pretty good job of removing dirt from carpeting? I really have a hard time believing that the Rainbow is the worst vacuum for cleaning carpeting among all vacuums tested by CR. It seems so counterintuitive given that Rainbows are sold by in home demonstrations (certainly with some trickery), but they have to wow the buyer enough to spend an obscene amount of money.
The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable. The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking.
|
retardturtle1
Joined: May 16, 2009
Points: 358
|
|
Re: Vacuum Museum
Reply #37 Sep 2, 2009 4:21 pm |
|
What is CR thinking. The Royal is one of the best because i own it. Seriously, It is an OK vacuum, however, I do not get a warm fuzzy feeling that it deep cleans. It does make the carpet look well groomed. Sounds like an Oreck doesn't it. I really liked my test drive of the Platinum bagged at Sears. I plan to purchase on this week for a test in the home, Sure wish I could sell the Kirby (and the Royal). I ain't parting with the Rainbow. Hopint that you have a good day. Mayve repair some Orecks. Knew youd come around sooner or later.....appears to be hope for you yet HS....But if i may ask, what is it you like so much about the Rbw?
turtle1
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Vacuum Museum
Reply #38 Sep 2, 2009 5:00 pm |
|
Knew youd come around sooner or later.....appears to be hope for you yet HS....But if i may ask, what is it you like so much about the Rbw? turtle1
Hi 'turtle1'
As the saying goes, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. HS did. Jumped ship [HMS dyson] before it sank. Carmine D.
|
|
|