Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
M00seUK
Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295
|
|
Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Original Message Jan 17, 2008 3:54 pm |
|
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #499 May 29, 2009 7:53 pm |
|
Hi again Model2: As I said to HS, he and others here are brainwashed by dyson propaganda. As I said too, you can't compare HOOVER USA to dyson USA. Probably true for the UK. HOOVER is a mainstream floorcare product seller. It's understandable that it has a mature, full, and complete product line for all manner of household and commercial vacuums and floorcare products. Dyson is a niche vacuum seller. It's efforts toward wanna be mainstream are futile and laughable. Dyson is high priced bagless only, period. End of the story. Carmine D. You are the brainwashed one. I know how you must hate to tell us why Hoover went belly up.
Dyson did it to them. You know. The manufacturer that introduced numerous models in an attempt to stay afloat. Each time a new model was introduced (about every 30 days) you predicted that it would be the demise of Dyson. You also said that VAX and others were stealing sales at BB and that Dyson was doomed. I still see the bid D in all stores as I have for years. Dyson is not the only manufacturer to suffer in these poor economic conditions, however, they survived the good times which can't be said for Hoover. I will now respond to your follow up in advance of reading it. Hoover is not alive and well. Only the name remains. It ain't Hoover that you hawked for years. You speak of niche vacuums. What the heck is Oreck? An electric broom favored by the weak and elderly. Also recall that each time a fault is found you try to dismiss the fault because it is not a full sized vacuum. That makes it a wannabe and alnost toy like. Maybe that is why it can't handle baking soda. Dyson kicked you in the peanuts as a consultant and then kicked your recommended brand. No wonder you hate them so badly. Maybe you and hoover should have worn a cup. Oh, I almost forgot. You and hoover did not have cups back then, only bags.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #500 May 30, 2009 6:46 am |
|
Hello Model2, and HS: I answered both your questions several times. You don't accept/understand my answers. Why? You're brainwashed by your favorite company's dyson bagless bin propaganda. Propaganda is a matter of fact. It's documented by dyson's legacy in the USA. The idiosy of a clutch. Sub par, sub standard brush roll. Floating head farce. DC07's use of an old inexpensive one fan Panasonic motor. Used simultaneously in Pano's cheapest upright for $60. Dyson mantra: Doesn't loose suction, doesn't clog. Ball technology is laughable nonsense in the vacuum industry. Dyson has to recreate itself as a niche vacuum seller [strictly high priced bagless]. Divest itself of all non-vacuum products. Downsize markets and employees. Retrench by cutting irrelevant and unprofitable R & D on products that lose money in the market place or like the DDM DC22 never sell in all markets.. Else like its falling vacuum market share in the UK, risk inevitable extinction and obsolescense. Carmine D.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #501 May 30, 2009 7:18 am |
|
PS for HARDSELL primarily and on the margin for MODEL2: You can't compare dyson to ORECK as niche sellers. Why? ORECKS are sold primarily through a network of ORECK stores nationwide. By last count over 500. Opening more all the time, despite the economy. And also sold through independent vacuum stores. Dyson'ssales venue has always been primarily big box store retailers. Big box retailers are another dying breed in the current economic tsunami: i.e. Circuit City, Linens-N-Things. Who knows which others bellying up in the months to come. A note on an unrelated industry but a product of teh times: FAO Schwartz [100 year history as a niche toy seller of high end quality toys like Steiff stuff animals] bought out by Toys R US, a main stream toy seller. KB toys went belly up even before the Christmas 2008 Season. Carmine D.
|
Model2
~ It Beats...as it Sweeps...as it Cleans ~
Location: England
Joined: Jan 8, 2009
Points: 155
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #502 May 30, 2009 7:48 am |
|
Hello Model2, and HS: I answered both your questions several times. You don't accept/understand my answers. Why? You're brainwashed by your favorite company's dyson bagless bin propaganda. Propaganda is a matter of fact. It's documented by dyson's legacy in the USA. The idiosy of a clutch. Sub par, sub standard brush roll. Floating head farce. DC07's use of an old inexpensive one fan Panasonic motor. Used simultaneously in Pano's cheapest upright for $60. Dyson mantra: Doesn't loose suction, doesn't clog. Ball technology is laughable nonsense in the vacuum industry. Dyson has to recreate itself as a niche vacuum seller [strictly high priced bagless]. Divest itself of all non-vacuum products. Downsize markets and employees. Retrench by cutting irrelevant and unprofitable R & D on products that lose money in the market place or like the DDM DC22 never sell in all markets.. Else like its falling vacuum market share in the UK, risk inevitable extinction and obsolescense. Carmine D. There you go - yet again - with your whole 'brainwashed by your favourite company' joke. It's rather a feeble attempt at humour that wasn't funny to begin with. Now it's just tiring, like watching the same bad sitcom episode again and again. Without the canned laughter. You know absolutely nothing about me - after all, why should you care? But your claim is particularly ironic considering which vacuum company I'm currently working with - it's certainly not Dyson, so the joke's on you!! Why is it you can't enter into a simple discussion without turning nasty when someone questions your thinking? I've read your contributions to the Vacweb forum, and you used to provide a lot of very interesting insight before you embarked on this campaign against Dyson, which seems to make up the entirety of your contribution nowadays.
This message was modified May 30, 2009 by Model2
~ However Clean - Hoover Cleaner ~
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #503 May 30, 2009 8:48 am |
|
What would be advantageous from a marketing point of view, is that a small, inexpensive 'starter' cube would be an ideal gift item, while providing a great opportunity to sell further appliance cubes to the recipient as time goes by. Say a person receives a 'kettle cube' as a gift, if they begin to appreciate its benefits, there would be great temptation to add a 'toaster cube' to it, to reclaim another power-point and the worktop space. Clearly, they'd be paying a slight premium for the added convenience aspect, yet the 'toaster cube' needn't cost much more to manufacture than one of those budget toasters - which represents a really attractive business prospect.
I'm surprised to hear that the Dyson washing machine might well get another launch in the near future. James Dyson admitted in an interview recently that while the basic premise was sound, they were incredibly arrogant in what they though people would pay for it and the huge costs involved with becoming established in this established market. Both points they overcame with the vacuum cleaners, but the false confidence was to cost them dear... at least to date. Hello M00seUK:
Interestingly, the latest HOME SHOW currently being held in Las Vegas features these 'kitchen cubes' and is attracting alot of consumer interest. Most of them too have been designed by students which adds to the attraction. I agree with your assessment and opinions of the dyson contra rotating washer. Not dyson's finest hour as a product invention and/or business venture. Carmine D.
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #504 May 30, 2009 9:43 am |
|
PS for HARDSELL primarily and on the margin for MODEL2: You can't compare dyson to ORECK as niche sellers. Why? ORECKS are sold primarily through a network of ORECK stores nationwide. By last count over 500. Opening more all the time, despite the economy. And also sold through independent vacuum stores. Dyson'ssales venue has always been primarily big box store retailers. Big box retailers are another dying breed in the current economic tsunami: i.e. Circuit City, Linens-N-Things. Who knows which others bellying up in the months to come. A note on an unrelated industry but a product of teh times: FAO Schwartz [100 year history as a niche toy seller of high end quality toys like Steiff stuff animals] bought out by Toys R US, a main stream toy seller. KB toys went belly up even before the Christmas 2008 Season. Carmine D. Actually I have to agree that Dyson and Oreck should not be compared as niche vacs. Although you are calling the wrong one a niche vac.
Oreck does not qualify as a full sized industry standard vac. Dyson does. Oreck brush can't be turned off. Dyson can. Oreck includes a gimmick gift so that they can justify a high price for obsolete technology with cheap parts. Dyson does not. Orecks strong point is being light weight and is marketed to the elderly and weaker users. Dyson is marketed to all users. Oreck is sold only through exclusively Oreck stores (BIG NICHE). Dyson is not. I could go on with reasons to show Oreck as a niche and Dyson as a standard, however, you should get the point. BTW, YOU ARE THE ONE WHO CONTINUES TO MAKE ALL THE COMPARISONS IN AN ATTEMPT TO TWIST THE TRUTH ABOUT A SIMPLE QUESTION THAT I ASKED.
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #505 May 30, 2009 9:45 am |
|
Hello Model2, and HS: I answered both your questions several times. You don't accept/understand my answers. Why? You're brainwashed by your favorite company's dyson bagless bin propaganda. Propaganda is a matter of fact. It's documented by dyson's legacy in the USA. The idiosy of a clutch. Sub par, sub standard brush roll. Floating head farce. DC07's use of an old inexpensive one fan Panasonic motor. Used simultaneously in Pano's cheapest upright for $60. Dyson mantra: Doesn't loose suction, doesn't clog. Ball technology is laughable nonsense in the vacuum industry. Dyson has to recreate itself as a niche vacuum seller [strictly high priced bagless]. Divest itself of all non-vacuum products. Downsize markets and employees. Retrench by cutting irrelevant and unprofitable R & D on products that lose money in the market place or like the DDM DC22 never sell in all markets.. Else like its falling vacuum market share in the UK, risk inevitable extinction and obsolescense. Carmine D. A lot of twisted BS to avoid answering my simple question.
|
HankJones
Joined: May 22, 2009
Points: 4
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #506 May 30, 2009 11:02 am |
|
Oreck and Hoover were the 2 companies in upright vacuum market to gain market share. All others including Dyson lost market share last year. Hoover gained double digit market share in the extraction market.
|
HankJones
Joined: May 22, 2009
Points: 4
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #507 May 30, 2009 11:05 am |
|
FYI--Hoover made a prototype for a vacuum being centered on a ball about 10 years ago. They decided not to go forward with the plans due to poor customer reception. Guess Dyson is copying Hoover...again.
|
|
|