Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Story here:  http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/40463852.html

Look close when watching this Video... What do you see "read" on the canister.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr-aT8sYNN8

Hello Acerone:

Hard to miss.  Gotta love it! 

WRT rug cleaning by the Dual V.  Note the build up of dirt where the rug meets the wall/floor moldingas the user goes over with the Dual V.  The Dual V won't get that out unless and user has to get down with a hand brush and clean to do the job completely.  An upright with good edge cleaning will prevent that dirt build up in the rug and molding seam.  Like ORECK!

Carmine D.

Acerone wrote:

Talking about printed labels on vacuum canisters, I recently repaired a EUREKA BOSS Smart Vac upright for the local Church.  Plastered on the front bag compartment cover were two big bold labels:  Rated a Best Buy by Consumers' Digest.  And Outcleans dyson by 60 percent for half the money.  In hard economic times, these advertising labels sell product!  People looking at a $100-$130 upright repair bill will buy a new vacuum like the EUREKA for a few dollars more.  Typically the EUREKA BOSS Smart Vac upright sells for $135-$150 at most big box retailers and while not made in the USA, it is made in Mexico, our next door neighbor. 

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:

Too bad that it takes lies to sell.

HARDSELL wrote:

Besides Consumer Digest selecting the EUREKA BOSS Smart Vac as its best vacuum year over year, Consumer Reports typically [year over year] recommends the $150 EUREKA Smart Vac upright over the more expensive uprights, dyson models in particular.  In fact, CR uses a dyson pic in its subscription literature with an admonition that spending more doesn't buy the best and shows a pic of the EUREKA for $150.

I know you didn't particularly care for the EUREKA BOSS SMART Vac, but I understand the Outreach Ministry at the Church use the EUREKA for vacuuming in the homes of the home bound/shut ins.  They were happy, according to the Pastor, and please to have it back in service. 

Carmine D.

Acerone wrote:
CarmineD wrote:
re: No Loss of Suction taken from Dyson.
More proof TTI is “stuck for an answer” when it comes to innovation (mechanical or marketing).  TTI gets it’s ideas two ways primarily...  1)  Whatever it INHERITS from the purchases of Hoover, Dirt Devil, VAX and 2) Whatever it TAKES from Dyson and others.

Hey Carmine, was there any laws broken when you through out the two goofs who were hurting a potential vacuum sale (two brothers if I remember).  How much would you of lost...  $60 or so?  And how many employees would you have to lay off?  None? One? Or Two?  Why do you cheer when a mans hard work is pilfered to the tune of [potentially] multi-millions lost and potentially hundreds of [folks w/ families] jobs lost?.  There is nothing to “love” or celebrate.  If thieves and the lazy were eliminated, the quality of life for the masses would skyrocket.


DIB

DysonInventsBig wrote:

No potential sale.  I made the sale:  Rebuilt HOOVER 29 upright with attachments for $34.95 with a one year warranty.  Another satisfied customer.  It's never about the money/profit.  It's about making the sale with the best product to meet the customer's needs and budget.  That's how you stay in business for over 40 plus years with no customer complaints.

As I recall the judge said:  If a man's home is his castle, then his business is his kingdom.  And His Honor threw the case out.  I even got my screwdriver back. 

Carmine D.

DysonInventsBig wrote:

Yes, but it would sacrifice suction pick up power more than you might imagine.

Carmine D.

I guess I understand DIBs problems with Oreck..its a whole back and forth thing... Advertising will always have creative exaggeration....I think the Oreck lawsuit is about Dyson telling a flat out LIE....I think the Manual for Dyson says its doesnt CLOG, but can aquire a "blockage"..hahahaha...  Innovaion huh... Where do you have to send a Dyson to get get repaired again..I wouldnt know..I have a local Oreck dealer..And how much does it cost to ship a 25+lb vac...again  I wouldnt know..mine weighs less than 9lbs...Oh and emptying this Dyson...where does all of that dust and debris go anyway..mostly into the trash and back into the air for you to breath..Talk about innovations. I would bet that there is a Dyson vac in almost every Oreck store for comparison.....

Orecks dont have a need for much improvment over what was created many many years ago. Have they made improvement..of course the inner bags alone are now available in a cloth like material that creates better air flow accompanied with charcoal to reduce pet smells(and the seal off the dirt) . Metal fans that use to chip and shatter are now replaced with plastic that may wear down, but will not bust and get slung thru a plastic housing. the belts that people complain about..are there to prevent motor damage in case the brush gets entangled. Tell that to Hoover owners when the plastic assemble breaks that spins those front brushes( I use to have one). and im sure there are many more improvements over the years.  As far as looks go..the NEW Platnium Plus has a carbon fiber top cover. How fururistic  and innovative do they really have to get? It doesnt have to look like a spaceship or be that difficult to use...Yes ive seen the Dyson that the handle comes apart and slides thru the slinky hose just to clean the baseboard edges. Bet thats real fun to work when your trying to finish cleaning up for a dinner party or in a hurry becuase the Mother-in-law is coming over.

 They have incorporated(bought out) other companins and incorporated thier tecnologies..IE Ironman and Halo.  Oreck not only produces a high quality/high warranty vac, but also has Cleaning products, Floor polishers, Shampooers, Steamers, Air Purifiers, Heaters, and a whole commercial line/division of the company just for supplying businesses witht he tools that they need to keep thier companies clean..So is there really a queastion of what oreck spends on new technologies..They found an idea and incorrorated it..they BOUGHT it..didnt steal it or copy it..like some other manufactures.

Sry to everyone..I dont mean to go off on a tangent, but when some are misinformed/uneducated and have an extremly closed mind it tends to bring out the worst in people...

I do own an Oreck(many) and enjoy them, but I appreciate what other companies bring to the table. I generally wont slam any product over one or two bad attributes..all vacs have a negative factor here and there.. There is always a compromise..and that compromise is what connects a machine to its owner.... You dont go mud ridding in a BMW...at the same time you dont take a hugh 4wheel drive truck with 52inch tires on the Audibon either

Personall all the Nah Nahing is kinda childish, but we all like to play in the sandbox at times...lol

Tread184 wrote:
The Oreck as a mechanical device is antiquated and in the public domain.  Any manufacturer is and can continue to freely copy it exactly (save any new design patents).  What would make the Oreck dealers and assembly workers have greater job security?  Being knocked off at will by competitors or being protected by strong UTILITY patents?  Today and for some time Dyson enjoys world monopolies via his patents.  In terms of innovation...  Oreck is a miserable failure, they have little to NO UTILITY PATENTS.  Can Oreck stop TTI or anyone from copying their vacuum and advertising (one pass for example) and informercials?  No.  Dyson dual cyclone was a perfect/near perfect mechanical design benefit...  or broad patent.  He had the worlds exclusive.  Today he has the worlds exclusive to the best steering vacuuming on the planet - the Ball.

Have you not figured out how to bag and capture most all the dust when emptying a Dyson?

Sir James and his team created a revolution and is the most copied vacuum and/or in parts vacuum in the world.  Miele patented Dyson-like cyclonic’s and recently applied for a clear bin and shroud patent.  The Miele spokesperson from the UK said the bag was the better choice (over so-called bagless), yet  they are coming out with separator filtration (per Mole, a dealer).

Dyson took a pounding on the way they advertised.  My guess is, this cost them tens of millions.  Have you looked at the false advertising Oreck does or did on their Canadian web site?  They claim their vacuums and their company is on the innovative cutting-edge (or something like this).

At the end of the day...  the sack N choke Oreck clogs and looses suction not unlike any sack N choke.  Dyson does not loose suction for up to 1 month (DC24/25) to 4-7 years (DDM DC22).

Have you seen the Gerry vacuum informercial?  If I were an Oreck dealer or assembly worker (or others), I’d be pretty upset at the Oreck suits.  While the Oreck vacuum and marketing is freely copied by competitors NO ONE IS COPYING the Dyson Ball.  And the Dyson Ball ranks high in sales per Target, Sears, Best Buy and Walmarts web sites.

While having a tube and hose built on-board (incorporated into an upright) so to become canister-like is not new in concept, but Dyson has the cleanest in the business.  Dyson proved this market too and now tubes/hoses is standard on uprights (credit goes to Dyson).
 
Oreck’s patents/lack of patents and dates tell the Oreck story well.  Oreck is not an innovator searching out innovative ways to solve lifes problems.  I know of an inventor who took a UV to Dave Oreck and was turned down.  Oreck looks to be an opportunist and nothing more.

Dave Oreck spoke at an University many years ago and was asked about inventions and he replied he believed in marketing (vice inventions).

Historically, innovation is King.


DIB

P.S.  Is the Ironman a technology?  Can you share the technologies patent number/s?  How is this sack N choke technologically different to the sack N chokes of the last 100 years?  The greater population wants on-board hose/wand [Dyson-led] arrangements.