Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

DysonInventsBig wrote:

Again, help me here.  What makes dyson patent inventions "revolutionary market advancements?"  Who makes the determination and based on what criteria?  Explain it to me.

Carmine D.

iMacDaddy wrote:

The DDM DC22 is the best kept vacuum secret on the US vacuum market so far.  After the dyson intor at the VDTA, the DDM DC22 should have been launched.  Not yet?  Dyson is having a problem here getting the launch off.  It's stalled in the gate.

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:

I would imagine that the indy only dc22  is being watched CLOSELY by the bean counters at the box accounts, Lets face it its really a premium priced piece competing with MIELE, RICCAR, bosch,and even some D.T.D. machines.

There is no guarantee that it will take off,even at the dyson faithful indy stores. It will be marketed by the box stores at wholesale and the indys get screwed again.

NOTHING NEW GOING ON HERE,MY  FRIENDS.

REGARDS

MOLE

DysonInventsBig wrote: Hi DIB,

I'm as happy as can be with my Tango -- looks mighty pretty and works darn good.

As for steering, that's the least of my concerns. It's cleaning ability that is my main concern. The "steering" is nice in that I find it useful in tight spaces. If I need to turn 90-degrees or whatever this way or that all that's required is a twist of the wrist.

I clean as I go. If I'm doing an area of floor and want to tend to nearby shelves or window sills, etc., the hose whips right out and tools are in easy reach. Task done, I put the hose in place again and the snap the attachment back onto the body of the cleaner. The S7's swivel has enhanced my manner of cleaning in that where I'd usually swing an entire upright around for a change of direction or to move in closer to walls or heavy objects there is now less effort.

Venson

DysonInventsBig wrote: Venson wrote:
Hello Venson,

Glad to hear steering has benefits for you too.  Changing directions is a bonus over the 1884 sweeper (vacuuming) way.  FYI, your vacuum sacrifices pick-up for steering and is more Dyson-like than you realize or care to admit.

DIB

DysonInventsBig wrote:
How does it sacrifice pick-up?

Venson

Venson wrote:

Ignore his ridiculous remarks.

The UK consumer magazine, "Which?", gave the Miele S7 a glowing report. Excellent pick-up performance over various floor types, and quieter than the Dysons too.

Trilobite wrote:
Hiya Trilobite,

How are you? I know, I know. I only asked because I've been in need of cause for a little humor lately.

Best,

Venson

Venson wrote:

Not bad at all, thank you. How are you, yourself?

How do you find the Miele? Is it easy to manoeuvre? Does it follow a straight line as you push it forward? Does it raise the carpet pile properly, like the old Hoovers did?

Although I don't possess an S7, the thing that appeals to me most is the variable suction control. I don't understand why  the likes of Hoover UK and Electrolux make powerful uprights
that can't have their power turned down for delicate materials. There aren't even any suction / air-bleed regulators. The only other upright that I've recently seen was a
Morphy Richards, but they don't get a good report.

I've been watching the forum for a little while. Some of the humour here is dry to say the least; almost bordering upon the acidic.

Trilobite wrote:
Hi,

I'm pretty good.

In answer to one question, there is some sort of "stop" that keeps the handle straight while the machine is in storage position (totally upright) and as you first lower it. Also, the machine won't lock into storage position unless the handle is standing straight. A good thing as balance would be thrown off.

My S7 does well on both low and high pile carpeting and gives out a reassuring old-time Hoover hum when the brush roll is working. It grooms as well as any good upright I have owned or seen -- including latter Kirby Gs which are my benchmark for thoroughness and effectiveness. The electronic variable suction facility is most helpful as you have about six or so settings to choose from. The only odd thing is that when the machine is set on "automatic" the machine reacts to suction impediment by lowering speed. There is no dust sensor in any of these uprights. That's neither a plus or minus.

To me, maneuverability is quite good. As I mentioned prior, I'm not out to run a slalom course with it but the S7 handles in a most convenient way when you want to get into corners or partway under or around objects you would not usually move during everyday cleaning. There is no wobble when making plain old straight passes. I may have misquoted this in a prior post but a twist of the handle allows you to angle the cleaning head about 45-degrees. A slight swing of the handle will position the head at about 90-degrees with little effort.

I sure Miele has an answer for this but I am used to one thing different. As an instance, my Kenmore bagless canister (the LG clone)has an automatic setting plus a dust sensor. In automatic mode the cleaner runs at a moderate speed and steps up power only when it senses a significant amount of dust in its air stream. Way cool I think though there are other people who prefer to have the machine running at a constant speed.

I totally agree about the lack of potentially helpful features on a lot of machines and wonder how much do manufacturers anticipate as proper remuneration per each convenience they may install on a specific model. Rest assured that money is most likely what the provision or lack of certain conveniences is all about. Nonetheless, this is where I get confused.

Kenmore, not necessarily loved by all but still a highly viable brand sales-wise here in the U.S., slaps conveniences aplenty -- dust sensors, cleaning wands with guide lights, electronically fitted hose-ends, special attachments, etc., on many of its high-end vacuums and until just of late has done that at relatively moderate prices. Other more expensive brands, Miele for one, seem to sell by way of finite dust capture claims and quiet and then subsequently sell the client more "convenience (additional tools, varied dust bag and filter types) as an option.

In my heart of heart of hearts I believe that the devices for speed adjustment, etc., probably only cost about half-a-dollar each to make and thus I can't see why you don't see more of the like included on more vacuums.

Then again that's how business works. I once knew an elderly lady who'd had a restaurant and had specialized in selling barbeque and other things. One of her big sellers was Polish sausage. She informed me that she never sold portions of sausage cut straight across. She cut portions on the diagonal to make it appear to the buyer he or she was getting more than they actually were.

It's sometimes the same with the makers of goods of all sorts -- they seldom set out to give more they just have to.

Venson