Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
mole
.
Location: earth
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Points: 783
|
|
Re: The DC27 - to replace the DC07 & DC14. Say good-bye to the clutch.
Reply #16 Mar 15, 2009 4:38 pm |
|
Hi Carmine, as long as the consumer likes the motorized hoky thats all that matters,orecks are simple ,lite, clean good enough for %99.7 of the owners,parts and repairs can be found without making a road trip out of it, Oreck has so many different price points from factory recons to the ultra, Its really nice to see that oreck is surviving in this economic climate. I will venture to say that ORECK has prospered because Dave and his family are real vacuum people,who have a passion for this business,sort of like Kirby,aerus/electrolux. I would say that the TTI management dont even know how to use a vacuum cleaner,nevermind make one. regards MOLE
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The DC27 - to replace the DC07 & DC14. Say good-bye to the clutch.
Reply #17 Mar 16, 2009 7:49 am |
|
Hi MOLE: ORECK is to the TTI Floorcare as old vacuum school is to new vacuum school. Carmine D.
This message was modified Mar 16, 2009 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The DC27 - to replace the DC07 & DC14. Say good-bye to the clutch.
Reply #21 Apr 1, 2009 2:39 pm |
|
There was some confusion on this machine early on. I have heard it is a great machine and indeed has a motorized brushroll. Sams Club shows the DC27 with a motorized brushroll.
DIB Here's the product's features from Sam's Club Web Site along with ONE [and only] product review dated December 28, 2008.
http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate.do?dest=5&item=418376 Carmine D.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: The DC27 - to replace the DC07 & DC14. Say good-bye to the clutch.
Reply #25 Apr 2, 2009 8:28 pm |
|
I am glad that they are doing away with the clutch. I bought a used DC14 from Craig's List about a year ago, and the clutch clicks a little bit every time I use it. Especially if I recline the handle after I've turned the machine on. Very annoying, though it doesn't seem to affect performance. I think it's an inane and unnecessary system and I'm glad to see it go. Another motor with its own power switch would be so much better! I thoroughly agree. The clutch on dysons is a prime example of dyson overengineering at its extremest. It adds an extra $135 of useless value to the product and passes it along at purchase and for repairs. By scrubbing the clutch on USA dysons, if in fact it is scrubbed [still some conflicting reports], dyson is admitting the same. Carmine D. Not even close. The clutch works as designed. Chatter: varying carpeting is a moving target for the brushroll and difficult to get right and/or clutch wear after a few years. The motorized brushroll is better for sure. Additionally... the motorized brushroll will lessen the likelihood of a Dyson owner wandering into a non-Dyson independent looking for a belt or clutch repair. $135 for clutch repair when it's a 10 minute repair and $20 part? ...Like I said, Dyson has to do all he can to keep his users from setting foot in non-Dyson dealer shops. DIB
This message was modified Apr 2, 2009 by DysonInventsBig
|
|
|