Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We now know....
Reply #23 Feb 4, 2009 6:57 pm |
|
If the halo failure in such a short period of time proved anything it is that the UV-C light has only niche appeal and specialty interest, not mainstream. MIELE, and other high end value vacuum makers, would argue, convincingly I might add, that their vacuums already minimize the hazardous health effects of household germs for the vast majority of households with frequent and proper vacuum use. They would say that UV-C technology is redundant for their vacuums. Hence, the higher ORECK Halo price tag of $599 too, niche market. The ORECK Halo will be pitched for the very few fastidious vacuum consumers who absolutely must have the UV-C light benefits and don't mind the corresponding drawbacks: Replacement bulbs and proper bulb disposal. Plus, the ORECK HOME Clean Centers offer a viable option to ORECK customers to upgrade to the ORECK Halo at a reasonable and affordable price with an ORECK trade-in. Halo, selling through big box stores right out of the gate without a network of dealers, didn't have this business advantage. If the initial ORECK Halo consumers are pleased and satisfied, they will spread the word about the UV-C benefits and in turn this will lead to further interest and hopefully, from ORECK's perspective, more sales. Unlike the halo scenario, which required successful sales from the starting gate, ORECK can pace itself and let the ORECK Halo find its own successful sales speed. Carmine D.
This message was modified Feb 4, 2009 by CarmineD
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We now know....
Reply #24 Feb 4, 2009 8:10 pm |
|
If the halo failure in such a short period of time proved anything it is that the UV-C light has only niche appeal and specialty interest, not mainstream. MIELE, and other high end value vacuum makers, would argue, convincingly I might add, that their vacuums already minimize the hazardous health effects of household germs for the vast majority of households with frequent and proper vacuum use. They would say that UV-C technology is redundant for their vacuums. Hence, the higher ORECK Halo price tag of $599 too, niche market. The ORECK Halo will be pitched for the very few fastidious vacuum consumers who absolutely must have the UV-C light benefits and don't mind the corresponding drawbacks: Replacement bulbs and proper bulb disposal. Plus, the ORECK HOME Clean Centers offer a viable option to ORECK customers to upgrade to the ORECK Halo at a reasonable and affordable price with an ORECK trade-in. Halo, selling through big box stores right out of the gate without a network of dealers, didn't have this business advantage. If the initial ORECK Halo consumers are pleased and satisfied, they will spread the word about the UV-C benefits and in turn this will lead to further interest and hopefully, from ORECK's perspective, more sales. Unlike the halo scenario, which required successful sales from the starting gate, ORECK can pace itself and let the ORECK Halo find its own successful sales speed. Carmine D. The basic thing is that this UV light thing isn't worth a hill of beans if it is not properly applied. It is highly doubtful that users in general will use them properly but will buy them due to familiar Oreck name. Thinking of an ideal product for this particle sanitizing medium it would have to be of all things, the Roomba. Roomba could be adjusted to travel at the slow steady speeds most conducive to best use of the UV light. That aside, I don't know how well the public has adapted to Oreck's other "borrowed" vacuums. The company picked up the European Philips canister named it the DutchTech and slapped a Wessel Werks PN on it. It's a good cleaner but I have heard little word of mouth regarding it or seen little ad action per Oreck on its behalf. http://www.oreck.com/canister-vacuum-cleaners/dutchtech_series.cfm
Oreck might have been better served to work the UV light into the Oreck design we're more familiar with. I think hte more familiar Oreck with a UV light worked would garner buyer trust more quickly. Venson
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We now know....
Reply #25 Feb 5, 2009 6:47 am |
|
Hello Venson: IRobot and ORECK will probably have a meeting of the minds on the UV-C light. I also wouldn't be surprised if the UV-C light is adapted to the familiar ORECK upright in time. BTW, recall that after halo lost the grievance filed by BISSELL about the veracity of its claims [I believe with the FTC], Ken Garcia commissioned another study at a University. His expectations were to show that frequent use with the halo vacuum and UV-C light was better for allergy and sinus sufferers than regular vacuuming. Obviously, Garcia was attempting to widen his target market with over 30 million persons in the USA with respiratory issues. I never heard the outcome of the study. But, I expect if there is a favorable outcome to this hypothesis by studies, this aspect of the halo's technology will be used as a sales pitch. Carmine D.
This message was modified Feb 5, 2009 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We now know....
Reply #28 Apr 18, 2009 2:02 pm |
|
Also at COSTCO, new [old] halo uprights for $99. http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?Prodid=11299638&search=halo&Mo=3&cm_re=1_en-_-Top_Left_Nav-_-Top_search&lang=en-US&Nr=P_CatalogName:BC&Sp=S&N=5000043&whse=BC&Dx=mode+matchallpartial&Ntk=Text_Search&Dr=P_CatalogName:BC&Ne=4000000&D=halo&Ntt=halo&No=0&Ntx=mode+matchallpartial&Nty=1&topnav=&s=1
This message was modified Apr 18, 2009 by CarmineD
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We now know....
Reply #29 Apr 18, 2009 2:22 pm |
|
Also at COSTCO, new [old] halo uprights for $99.
Hi Carmine, Thanks for the heads-up. The price is nice and I would think for a hundred bucks it may be okay. The customer reviews at the Costco site regarding this machine were not great however. Only one of four reviews posted there favored this machine. (I think these reviews came in while it was being sold at higher price.) Venson
|
Tread184
Joined: Jul 21, 2009
Points: 7
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We now know....
Reply #31 Jul 21, 2009 5:15 am |
|
I have heard talk of a new Canister and Air Purifier with Halo ....Maybe Oreck will put it to good use. i wasnt impressed with the Halo Vac as the suction isnt as good as my XL21 or that the fact that my vac virtually pulls itself along..As far a germ killing goes...if we dont ever have germs and get sick from time to time, will our immune systems ever have a chance to get stronger..Im sure its great for newborns and helth ridden children..but not for everyone.
|
|
|