Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Did they go out of business? GetHalo.com now sells only the vacuum cleaner bags...

CarmineD wrote:
The basic thing is that this UV light thing isn't worth a hill of beans if it is not properly applied.  It is highly doubtful that users in general will use them properly but will buy them due to familiar Oreck name. Thinking of an ideal product for this particle sanitizing medium it would have to be of all things, the Roomba.  Roomba could be adjusted to travel at the slow steady speeds most conducive to best use of the UV light. 

That aside, I don't know how well the public has adapted to Oreck's other "borrowed" vacuums.  The company picked up the European Philips canister named it the DutchTech and slapped a Wessel Werks PN on it.  It's a good cleaner but I have heard little word of mouth regarding it or seen little ad action per Oreck on its behalf.  http://www.oreck.com/canister-vacuum-cleaners/dutchtech_series.cfm

Oreck might have been better served to work the UV light into the Oreck design we're more familiar with.  I think hte more familiar Oreck with a UV light worked would garner buyer trust more quickly.

Venson

Hello Venson:

IRobot and ORECK will probably have a meeting of the minds on the UV-C light.  I also wouldn't be surprised if the UV-C light is adapted to the familiar ORECK upright in time.

BTW, recall that after halo lost the grievance filed by BISSELL about the veracity of its claims [I believe with the FTC], Ken Garcia commissioned another study at a University.  His expectations were to show that frequent use with the halo vacuum and UV-C light was better for allergy and sinus sufferers than regular vacuuming.  Obviously, Garcia was attempting to widen his target market with over 30 million persons in the USA with respiratory issues.  I never heard the outcome of the study.  But, I expect if there is a favorable outcome to this hypothesis by studies, this aspect of the halo's technology will be used as a sales pitch. 

Carmine D. 

Hi,

Just got to see an Oreck Halo commercial on TV this morning for the first time. I have to say I was a bit put off with the statement that the vacuum was a product backed by forty years of Oreck technology or something to that effect, vaguely implying that the Halo is all Oreck's idea. (Aerus gets my goat for the same reasons.) Nonetheless, they are going gangbusters to get this baby on the streets.

Though the price is never mentioned during the commercial($600.00 per the website), you are made aware at least twice that Oreck will allow a whole year before payments begin with no interest. As well there's a five-year warranty on the UV lamp, three free tune-ups and plus a year's supply of bags. These are probably the most memorable parts of the thing . . .

The petri dish thing with "expert" included prevails throughout. An astonished mom with pop by her side states she never realized what was on her floors once informed by the expert, nearly clear petri dish in hand, that the Halo has removed 90 percent of invisible nasties from the floor that her bay is crawling about on. I may have missed it but no info as to use was supplied as to how to achieve the 90 percent level of clean. Anyway . . .

Looks they may be on a roll so more power to 'em. Do you think the manner of advertising is where the original Halo folks went wrong or that this is more a matter of the add-on of the Oreck name?

Venson

While I'm thrilled ORECK has the halo technology, and it's still in the industry, the ORECK halo, unless I'm wrong, is still a $600 vacuum made in China.  I'm not thrilled about the latter.

Halo was a $500 China vacuum with a one year warranty, marketed as a mainstream user with false and exaggerated product claims, through big box retailers.  At the worse possible economic time for new consumer products.  The combination of all these facts and circumstances did the halo in so quickly.

Carmine D.

Also at COSTCO, new [old] halo uprights for $99.

 

CarmineD wrote:
Hi Carmine,

Thanks for the heads-up. The price is nice and I would think for a hundred bucks it may be okay. The customer reviews at the Costco site regarding this machine were not great however. Only one of four reviews posted there favored this machine. (I think these reviews came in while it was being sold at higher price.)

Venson

Venson wrote:

I think the same.  Considering the prices that ORECK is selling these rebadged halos for, the $100 is a steal.  Perhaps a good option for Chris in the above thread.

Carmine D.

I have heard talk of a new Canister and Air Purifier with Halo ....Maybe Oreck will put it to good use.  i wasnt impressed with the Halo Vac as the suction isnt as good as my XL21 or that the fact that my vac virtually pulls itself along..As far a germ killing goes...if we dont ever have germs and get sick from time to time, will our immune systems ever have a chance to get stronger..Im sure its great for newborns and helth ridden children..but not for everyone.

From what I can see and hear, ORECK is not pushing the halo except in rare and limited cases.

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:
Hey guys it's been a while but I thought I'd check in... I work at a vac shop and have seen a few of these units come in for repair. So far the failures have been cord, switch and brush bearing/hair issues. Unfortunately there are no OEM parts. And their customer service by phone takes 2 weeks for a response and email takes about a week. Aside from the failures mentioned the units seem to be very sturdy, but open the hood and whoa.. looks like a problem waiting to happen.