Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them
Reply #10 Feb 1, 2009 7:48 pm |
|
Thanks Acerone, The Garcia story really doesn't tell much but this approach is exactly what should have been done in the first place. It is clearly stated that the more exposure, the better even though, in light-colored text, careful disclaimers make note that the machine is not a cure-all for disease, including asthma or allergies. The exposure issue may encourage buyers who feel there may be some value to the product either to vacuum often or longer. Not a bad thing. Best, Venson PS -- The caption "With the New Oreck Halo, you are vacuuming and killing many of the germs on your carpets and floors at the same time. No extra effort. No extra time. Just vacuum like you normally would! is contradictory.
This message was modified Feb 1, 2009 by Venson
|
Trebor
Joined: Jan 16, 2009
Points: 321
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them
Reply #11 Feb 2, 2009 12:07 am |
|
I just toured the Oreck Halo website. WOW! Very well done! I predict big sales for Oreck on this baby! Now, if David Oreck were really smart he would make a P/N with the UV technology for sale as a retrofit for all those diehard Lux and Miele fans. Their web designer knows his/her stuff. Now, a few endorsements from pediatric allergists, a geriatric specialist, a skin doctor, and a veterinarian or two, and David Oreck might be rich enough to retire! The regular Oreck website makes no mention of the Halo, and a search of the site turns up nothing. So for now at least it is a totally separate entity. Was the original Halo with OBT a 2-motor unit? The Oreck version is, and it has a height adjustment. Should reel in a few customers on the fence due to those issues. I answered my own question by doing a search for Halo vacuum. David Oreck and co. decided to replace the clutch drive assembly for the brushroll with a second motor. The other major change seems to be in the lens that focuses and concentrates the UV-C light on the floor.
This message was modified Feb 2, 2009 by Trebor
|
RAD1
Joined: Dec 6, 2008
Points: 17
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We know now....
Reply #14 Feb 2, 2009 1:08 pm |
|
As I am reading these comments, I find it humorous, as I approached Miele 3+ years ago about making and marketing a UV-C light for their vacuums. Simple thought for me, as I market and distribute UV-C light systems for forced a/c and heating systems for homes. O well, it vever got off the ground with Miele.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We know now....
Reply #17 Feb 4, 2009 12:24 am |
|
As I am reading these comments, I find it humorous, as I approached Miele 3+ years ago about making and marketing a UV-C light for their vacuums. Simple thought for me, as I market and distribute UV-C light systems for forced a/c and heating systems for homes. O well, it vever got off the ground with Miele. Rad1, How did Miele treat you? Did you have to sign your life away... sign their disclosure, which typically states your rights (of said widget) are covered by your patent only. Thanks. DIB
This message was modified Feb 4, 2009 by DysonInventsBig
|
RAD1
Joined: Dec 6, 2008
Points: 17
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We know now....
Reply #18 Feb 4, 2009 2:34 pm |
|
Rad1,
How did Miele treat you? Did you have to sign your life away... sign their disclosure, which typically states your rights (of said widget) are covered by your patent only. Thanks.
DIB DIB, Actually it never really got passed "round 1" so to speak. I don't think they really saw a need, to be honest. I look at it like this...they had a better focus of the niche market and current core product and manufacturing a "specialty" vac - which is what the UV-C vac is - wasn't in their best interest. I tend to agree, really. Like I said, I distribute UV-C lights now - Believe me, people HAVE to be educated about these. It's not an impulse buy. Especially for $599 like the Oreck Halo will be. Plus, you are now talking about replacement costs on the bulb - which HAVE to be replaced every 1 to 1.5 years. This is where David Oreck will make money - in the replacement goods (besides the ridiculous mark-up in the vacuum itself).
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Halo Vacuum... What happened to them... We know now....
Reply #19 Feb 4, 2009 3:52 pm |
|
DIB, Actually it never really got passed "round 1" so to speak. I don't think they really saw a need, to be honest. I look at it like this...they had a better focus of the niche market and current core product and manufacturing a "specialty" vac - which is what the UV-C vac is - wasn't in their best interest. I tend to agree, really. Like I said, I distribute UV-C lights now - Believe me, people HAVE to be educated about these. It's not an impulse buy. Especially for $599 like the Oreck Halo will be. Plus, you are now talking about replacement costs on the bulb - which HAVE to be replaced every 1 to 1.5 years. This is where David Oreck will make money - in the replacement goods (besides the ridiculous mark-up in the vacuum itself). Hi RAD1, I've been trying to backtrack to learn who it was who made but htere was a UV set-up that was retro-fitted on re-furb Kirbys. The maker used a name all its own. The product does not appear to have endured on the market but It had to have come out some time last year when the Halo to-do began. I peeked at a Consumer Reports on the rack at Costco and noticed that Halo, way down low on the list, rated as "good" for carpet cleaning but emissions scores were excellent. Since you have some knowledge of UV lights, do you think they can last through the usual thumping and bumping most vacs endure and what's your guesstmate regarding price of replacement . Thanks, Venson
|
|
|