Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
techphet
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Points: 20
|
|
Considering the Simplicity Synergy...
Original Message Jul 24, 2008 7:12 pm |
|
I started the thread about lead cleanup and the Eureka sealed-HEPA system... I'm now looking at spending the extra dollars to purchase the Simplicity Synergy. The price tag alone makes me worry that the Eureka sealed HEPA isn't as impressive as the marketing makes it sound. Again, I know a vacuum cleaner alone isn't a solution to a lead-paint chipping problem but I am venturing to guess that the right vacuum cleaner (with a sealed HEPA system) will improve the situation while the wrong vacuum cleaner (an inexpensive Bissell or Eureka) may actually make the situation worse. I cringe to think that every time I'm vacuuming I'm just blowing more lead dust up into the air and making the environment more hazardous than it was to begin with. The Simplicity salesman I spoke with told me that the Synergy air filtration was "hospital grade." I also remember reading on here that "hospital grade" is not necessarily a good thing. Can anyone elaborate on this? Is $700 a reasonable price for a Synergy (this is marked down $200 with a trade-in). I've seen the Minuteman Lead HEPA for $625 here. Any opinions on if the filtration of the Synergy would be equal to or better than this Minuteman Lead HEPA? I also forgot to ask the Simplicity salesman about canister vacuums- would these be less expensive? He did confirm that a bagless vacuum is not the way to go- I will not be purchasing one of these. Thanks again, Tech
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Considering the Simplicity Synergy...
Reply #59 Aug 4, 2008 6:30 pm |
|
Hello David: Glad to hear that all's well that ends well. Please remember to post a review and enjoy vacuuming with your new Verve. MOLE, like me, is a seasoned veteran of the vacuum industry. We're from the old school and when the usual safety features don't work, we start suspecting the worse. Do not take umbrage. Perhaps the lack of the "click" played a role in the problem you experienced. But without a doubt the store and staff were slipshod with you and the vacuum/sale/demo. Try the bag and see if you have a feel/knack for the correct installation. Be not afraid. Carmine D.
This message was modified Aug 4, 2008 by CarmineD
|
"There is no BEST or PERFECT vacuum cleaner"
"Take care of your vacuum, then your vacuum will take care of you"
Joined: Dec 1, 2004
Points: 1683
|
|
Re: Considering the Simplicity Synergy...
Reply #60 Aug 4, 2008 10:31 pm |
|
Wow, thread sure took off... I'll have to read through the replies later as I only have a few minutes right now.
An update, however...
I was reading through the instruction manual and read that when inserting the bag I am supposed to listen for a "click." I had taken the bag out of the previous vacuum when inspecting it to determine if it was used or not and when I put it back in I heard no "click," (didn't know I was supposed to). I'm not sure if this could be the cause of the problem or not? I am hesitant to open the bag compartment to look inside my new vacuum- should there be any issue with doing this?
Regards,
Tech Now we are getting somewhere. You did mess w/the bag. Make sure that you read the instructions and understand them. You are not going to really hear a "click"all that well. You are going to feel something more than hear. When you insert the bag collar in the holder, you will slide it all the way in. It will hit a bump on both sides. When you close the lid, it will close very easily. You can look through the intake(where the hose connects to the machine) and see the inside of the bag. You will not see any part of the cardboard collar if the bag is installed properly. The lid can be opened and closed multiple times w/o hurting the bag. "Take care of your vacuum, then your vacuum will take care of you."
This message was modified Aug 4, 2008 by Mike_W
|
techphet
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Points: 20
|
|
Re: Considering the Simplicity Synergy...
Reply #61 Aug 5, 2008 3:00 am |
|
Make sure that you read the instructions and understand them. Mike, Now that I have an instruction manual that's a lot easier to do. If the manual had been linked under the product page on the website I would have found it there. "About MY Simplicity" sounds to me like something a user needs to register for (like 'My Yahoo'). "About Simplicity," is where I would expect to find a company history and contact information. Thanks for the tips- I'm sure I'll be looking through the intake each time I install a bag. I would hate for the inside of my bag compartment to be such a mess again. Carmine, The store definitely has some room for improvement but the way they treated me makes up for any mishaps. It might be a few days before I build up the bravery to open the bag compartment- besides, I wouldn't want to let any dust in. I take a bit too much offense anytime someone insinuates that I am lying. Tech
|
techphet
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Points: 20
|
|
Re: Considering the Simplicity Synergy...
Reply #62 Aug 5, 2008 3:59 am |
|
I took two pictures of the bag compartment, is this the bag holder coupling partially shown in this one? Sorry, the pictures aren't cropped, I shot them with a 50mm lens and didn't think about capturing anything other than the dust. I took a look at the plastic part that the bag slides into (coupling?) when first examining the vacuum- it looks like the weight of the bag pulls the mechanism down, allowing the door to close? That feature did operate properly, it's not like the bag was just floating in there... Hopefully the store had a chance to look at it and can give me a bit of feedback tomorrow (I assume you're not interested in conferencing the call Mole?). The bag argument has me worried that I'll see my bag come 'adrift' in the future. As Carmine pointed out earlier though, at least I know the dust is staying inside the bag compartment. Tech
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Considering the Simplicity Synergy...
Reply #63 Aug 5, 2008 4:29 am |
|
I took two pictures of the bag compartment, is this the bag holder coupling partially shown in this one?
I took a look at the plastic part that the bag slides into (coupling?) when first examining the vacuum- it looks like the weight of the bag pulls the mechanism down, allowing the door to close? That feature did operate properly, it's not like the bag was just floating in there... Hopefully the store had a chance to look at it and can give me a bit of feedback tomorrow (I assume you're not interested in conferencing the call Mole?). The bag argument has me worried that I'll see my bag come 'adrift' in the future. As Carmine pointed out earlier though, at least I know the dust is staying inside the bag compartment. Tech Hello David Tech:
Yes, the Verve bag holder coupling is pictured here with the bag installed. This is a better photo for diagnosing the problem with the bag installation in the holder than the first one you posted. Why? It shows that the Verve cardboard bag collar has caved in. It is not straight and stiff [as when it is new]. This is the reason [IMHO] that the dirt escaped into the Verve bag compartment. This probably happened when you opened, removed, and reinstalled the original paper bag. The cardboard collar did not become adrift. Instead, more likely it became concave [deformed]. This condition I believe degraded the collar and seal of the bag in the coupling. However, it still does not definitively explain the reason the Verve fail safe switch did not shut off the vacuum. Based on the amount of dirt in the bag compartment, one would presume the fail safe switch would have engaged. Unless, despite all the dirt, none/not enough passed through the pre-motor filter in the bag compartment into the motor compartment to allow the motor's sensor to notice a problem. Not a surprising conclusion. Since the dirt never escaped onto the outside of the vacuum either. A testament to the quality and craftsmanship of the Verve vacuum, despite its country of production. It's still made to Tacony's meticulous specifications. Which based on your case, demonstrate a high standard of excellence. IMHO. As a general rule for vacuum users, the cardboard bag collars are not made and meant to be removed and reinstalled prior to replacing the paper bag. Once you install a new paper bag and collar in the bag holder coupling, it should remain there until it's time to remove and replace with a new bag. Not to be removed and reinstalled during its useful life. Especially when its weighted down with dirt. Making it more difficult to reinstall properly. I'm pleased and delighted that the store did the right thing by you. Renews my confidence in my fellow small business vacuum cleaner owner/operator stores. You've done a yeoman's job in providing us here the facts and circumstances to diagnose the original Verve problem. Not an easy task for someone like you, who does not have any professional vacuum cleaner experience, to do on a Forum. Enjoy your new Verve and new home. Carmine D.
This message was modified Aug 5, 2008 by CarmineD
|
techphet
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Points: 20
|
|
Re: Considering the Simplicity Synergy...
Reply #65 Aug 5, 2008 1:37 pm |
|
However, it still does not definitively explain the reason the Verve fail safe switch did not shut off the vacuum. Based on the amount of dirt in the bag compartment, one would presume the fail safe switch would have engaged. Unless, despite all the dirt, none/not enough passed through the pre-motor filter in the bag compartment into the motor compartment to allow the motor's sensor to notice a problem. Not a surprising conclusion. Since the dirt never escaped onto the outside of the vacuum either. A testament to the quality and craftsmanship of the Verve vacuum, despite its country of production. It's still made to Tacony's meticulous specifications. Which based on your case, demonstrate a high standard of excellence. IMHO. Carmine, There was considerably more dirt on the pre-motor filter before I took the picture (I removed chunks of it in a similar manner as one would remove lint from a clothes dryer). I should have taken more pictures but by far the majority of the dirt was located in the upper left-hand corner of the pre-motor filter. I did not remove anything from the right hand side and the entire bottom half was quite clean. Perhaps the unrestricted portion of the filter kept the motor cool? The HEPA filter was dirty but I am not sure if it was ready to be changed. As I was told in the store however, the back side of the HEPA filter was spotless. I see what you mean about the bag collar being deformed. I plan on putting the new vacuum through hours of cleaning today. Will post the review after I've used it for a while (maybe I'll wait until the first bag change LOL). Regards, Tech
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Considering the Simplicity Synergy...
Reply #67 Aug 5, 2008 6:17 pm |
|
Carmine,
.... I did not remove anything from the right hand side and the entire bottom half was quite clean. Perhaps the unrestricted portion of the filter kept the motor cool? The HEPA filter was dirty but I am not sure if it was ready to be changed. As I was told in the store however, the back side of the HEPA filter was spotless.
I see what you mean about the bag collar being deformed.
I plan on putting the new vacuum through hours of cleaning today. Will post the review after I've used it for a while (maybe I'll wait until the first bag change LOL).
Regards,
Tech
Hello Tech:
I think your observations and conclusion about the pre-motor filter are very astute. You're probably right. Looking forward to reading your review of the new Verve. Carmine D.
|
|
|