Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Has anyone seen this yet?  It just hit the shelves a couple of weeks ago at Wal-Mart (not even on the Hoover or WM website at this point), I picked one up around that time after speaking to Tom G. (who was the first one to tell me about it) but had neglected to post about it on here until now.  I finished posting a review in the Reviews section, needless to say I am very impressed with the machine now that I have been using it for a couple of weeks and highly encourage everyone to at least head to Wal-Mart and check it out. 

For those of you who haven't seen it, TTI/Hoover has finally jumped on the multi-cyclone bandwagon after experimenting with dual-cyclone for a couple of years with the Mach series, and only recently getting *that* right with a redesigned shroud for the Mach 3.  This Whisper is completely different, it's a copy of a Root Cyclone Dyson and a damn good one at that.  At $120 I am blown away by the type of machine it is, very substantial and not cheap-feeling by any means.  It's a completely new design, and appears to contain elements of the Mach series, the failed "One" cleaner in the UK, and, oddly enough, the LG/Kenmore Premalite.  At first glance it appears to be a dual-cyclone machine, until you either look at the side of the box or separate the two halves of the cyclone assembly.  Indeed, there are 6 high-efficiency cyclones hidden above the bin, and they look just like a Dyson's.  You will also notice the cyclonic "arrows" on the Hoover logo in front, for added emphasis

Carpet performance is good, it handles very nicely (positive weight) and the double-chevron brushroll helps pull the machine along; the bristles are soft but still effective.  What sets it apart from the Dyson though is above-floor cleaning convenience.  You push a button and the handle wand releases, you do not even have to let go of the handle; you're using the SAME ergonomic handle you just vacuumed the carpet with.  The wand is long as well, and does not need to be inverted for use.  There are only 2 attachments, and the wand isn't adjustable, but the brush/upholstery tool is, I presume to reach tight spaces.  I suppose if worse comes to worse other standard 1 1/4" attachments could work, it appears to be the same though I have not tried it.  I'll check that out further and post the findings.  The motor is soft-starting (like the Hoover Z), and the brushroll (driven by a separate motor) automatically starts and stops when the handle is lowered or raised, if the brushroll switch is on.  There are also 2 indicator lights showing when the brushroll is on, and when the suction is blocked.

This machine is basically a Dyson DC07 or DC14...at a third of the price.  Being a Dyson fan I hate to say it, but Dyson may be facing some competition with this machine as far as regular uprights are concerned, once it is more widely available and more people find out about it.  It's no match for the DC17 in terms of performance, obviously, but I can't see any reason why the 7 or 14 would be more desirable, as strange as that sounds.  If it was inexpensive and worked well but cheaply made, then it's obvious the Dyson would be the clear winner (as it usually is), but that's the thing...this machine does not seem to be cheaply made at all.  Definitely no WindTunnel here and I can't see why it wouldn't last a reasonable length of time.   On the other hand, while possibly not-so-good news for Dyson this could be some positive news for Hoover, perhaps the first of many machines to come?  It will be interesting to see what the future holds.

-MH

I see this as enhancing performance rather than the useless light.  I once strapped a ligh ton my DC07.  No increase in performance.

Perhaps you just needed new batteries.  I'm certain that would make a difference :-)

Dusty

dusty wrote:
That companies have a HEART and WANT to go GREEN for the betterment of Earth & Mankind is laughable....that we buy into it, is pathetic. It's a marketing tool no more no less and if it actually does work, merely a bonus. Try working in an advertising for a day any you will get quite an education. The American public is not as intelligent as we give them credit for (note the success of Shark and euro pro, LOL). Companies dictate what they want. That the will of the free market dictates, is an OLD axiom. Give them cow patties and thats the only choice..they buy it. Then Companies conclude "The market place DEMANDS cow paties lets give em more!

I'm not proud of becoming a cynic but the Market demands I be...LOL

dusty wrote:

Hey Dusty:

For disposable vacuums: use and throwaway, yes they are. 

Carmine D.

dusty wrote:

Hey Dust Man:

I thought it was because the EUREKA Boss Smart Vac upright has a huge sticker on it that says it cleans 60 times better than a dyson. 

BTW, in the yearly CR editions for best buy in appliances and the new subscriber mail outs, the EUREKA Boss Smart vac still gets the recommendation as Best Buy for vacuums.  Often with a picture of a yellow dyson with the CR verbage: More money doesn't buy you better performance in vacuums.  That's from CR's hand not mine.

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:

Are you talking about the testers that reported Hoover WT to nave excelent exhaust emissions when outside tests found them to be very unacceptable?  This is supposed to be a HEPA vac,

CarmineD wrote:
The sticker actually reads "cleans 60% better than dyson" and then of couse the proverbial asteric *on plush carpet compared to a DC07.

Interesting that even with CR's best buy rating  the DC07 achieves higher user ratings based on reviews on the CR site itself.

Dusty

dusty wrote:

The Boss blows dust and dirt across hard surfaces.  It does a good job on carpet but is useless on hard surfaces. That was my experience.

Hey Guys:

Talking green for vacuums and acting green are two very different things. 

If vacuum makers, who cater to big box retail stores [HOOVER, EUREKA, DIRT DEVIL, dyson] were concerned about the environment, they'd be making metal vacuums and not plastic throw-aways. 

BTW, the Wal*Mart Super store in LV stocks more racks of bagless filters than paper bags.  Why?  Concerned about going green?  Yes, indeed.  Green as in the color of US money.  Big box stores make more money on the sale of an average price bagless vacuum filter than 10 packs of paper bags.  The HOOVER nano lite bagless sells for $50.  The filter is $15!  The HOOVER Tempo sells for about the same and the paper bags are $2-$3 each. 

Not surprising on the rave dyson reviews.  People plunk down $500 plus on a big box store dyson and justify the wisdom [lack thereof]  of the purchase by praising it.  I call it the honeymoon purchase time.  Americans, in a good economy, will buy anything once.  Classic example is the Regina Electrik Broom.  Worse floorcare product ever made and sold.  Many sold for years and years.  Oftentimes for the same price or more than a decent full size vacuum, over $100.  Pyramid schemes thrive on this human frailty and mentality.  Suck others in by praising the benefits over the costs. 

I believe in the famous words of the great American philosophers:  Lucky1, PT Barnum, and Forrest Gump.  The latter said: Stupid is what stupid does!

Carmine D.

dusty wrote:

So Dust Man, what are you saying exactly by the above?  EUREKA cleans better than a dyson DC07.

Or, are you impugning the DC07 on plush carpets?  [DIB, DC18, Motor are you out there?]  Are you siding with MOLE and I, the dyson critics.  Heaven forbid that we are right.  And Vacuumfreake!

Or, are you saying that the DC07, the signature dyson vacuum with THE MOST AIR WATTS of 270, is the best dyson to use for a vacuum test comparison by EUREKA?  Which is it?

Even an excellent wordsmither like you can't have it both ways. Want to try?

BTW, did anyone answer MOLE on what spec dysoners use these days to boast the superiority of dysons?  Use to be air watts.  I heard that until I was ready to burst.  No more.  Gone from 270 to 200 and less.  What is it now, I missed it?  US $$$.  That's way down too!

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:

Not surprised about the filters.  The pleated Hoover filters should be disposed after each vacuuming.