Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Original Message May 29, 2008 12:41 pm |
|
ORECK - The business, the history, the machine, the man and related. (Below: Oreck 1979 to 2008)
< yr. 1979 < yr. 5/2008
This message was modified Oct 30, 2008 by DysonInventsBig
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #40 Jun 3, 2008 1:10 pm |
|
Hello DIB: Oftentimes, makers innovate by making slight modifications so as to extend the patent period longer when it is due to expire. Not really due to their need to innovate to be better. But I'm sure you are already aware of this fact. With regard to the number of ORECK stores nationwide, the most recent number [early this year] is 500 and growing. I've underestimated in some recent posts. Carmine D. Hello, My understanding of getting an extension - only if there was some sort of delay in the obtaining/getting approval for a patent and mostly drug related patents. And I think it is no longer than 5 years at most. I do not know the answer for sure. My guess is no, society comes first and inventors come second. Q: Can an inventor prevent society from *benefiting from a widget if the original inventor keeps tweaking a product and locking up (monopolizing) the entire widget for an additional 20 year patent period. My guess is no. I'm sure James would of loved to have been able to tweak his dual cyclone and extend the patent life vesus competing against his own work in the market place. DIB *After a patent expires others can make for sale said widget and society “benefits”.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #41 Jun 3, 2008 1:19 pm |
|
Hello,My understanding of getting an extension - only if there was some sort of delay in the obtaining/getting approval for a patent and mostly drug related patents. And I think it is no longer than 5 years at most. DIB Hello DIB: With drugs the period is 3-10 years after the drug is publicly marketed. More time with extensions if the maker claims the drug is tweaked. Wonderful case currently being heard. The drug is TRICOR. The maker is trying to keep generics from market after patent expiration dates by arguing it's changed the drug along the way. Competitors have taken the maker to court. I predict the competition will win. TRICOR's maker will bite the dust. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 3, 2008 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #42 Jun 3, 2008 1:23 pm |
|
Hi Just,
Not to derail from the original Oreck-related discussion but since you mentioned Kirby I must also point out that they are another manufacturer with the same problem, unwillingness to update and improve the design. -MH
Hello TOM:
Sort of like Air Way! Is that brand vacuum still around and in business like ORECK and KIRBY? What ever happened? Who knows? Who cares? Topic unworthy. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 3, 2008 by CarmineD
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #43 Jun 3, 2008 2:01 pm |
|
Hello DIB: With drugs the period is 3-10 years after the drug is publicly marketed. More time with extensions if the maker claims the drug is tweaked. Wonderful case currently being heard. The drug is TRICOR. The maker is trying to keep generics from market after patent expiration dates by arguing it's changed the drug along the way. Competitors have taken the maker to court. I predict the competition will win. TRICOR's maker will bite the dust. Carmine D. Carmine, That’s just it! If society benefits, patent extensions for life saving or bettering drugs are given, but I do not believe it is the same for non-drug patents. . Can you link me 1 or 2 good articles that talk/follow this Tricor story? Thanks. DIB
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #45 Jun 3, 2008 3:54 pm |
|
Hello HARDSELL: Recall, if you can, that ORECK specifically matches its rug cleaning performance against the dyson DC07 and DC14. Both of which you owned. You didn't like the DC14. But did the DC07. Both have the same identical brush roll. And power! That leads me to doubt your findings not just for the dysons but ORECK too. Visit your local ORECK store and YOU can perform the rug cleaning tests using the ORECK and dysons DC07/DC14. Try the kapoc test. This has been an industry standard test since Tom Gasko was walking on all fours in diapers and crying dyson. ORECK will pick up most if not all the kapoc in 2 passes. Forward and back. Dyson will take 9 or 10 passes back and forth and still leave traces behind. Carmine D.
The 07 and 14 do not have the same suction power.
I already did the kapock test. Remember you brought this up when I recommended baking soda as a test. BTW the Oreck still will not pass the baking soda test.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #46 Jun 3, 2008 4:06 pm |
|
cztlady did not think that the Oreck was that good. I think you already know what she said. Hello HARDSELL:
If I recall, catlady said the ORECK did not perform as good as the Miele. My sense is the belt in the ORECK model [probably display/demo] needed replacing. Belts must be replaced even if the vacuum is not used. If my new vacuum budget was $600 and in the market for a full size, I'd opt for the Miele too over the ORECK. Remember for $600, I bought 4 ORECK XL Classics and all the recipients rave over them! Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 3, 2008 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #47 Jun 3, 2008 4:11 pm |
|
The 07 and 14 do not have the same suction power.
Hello HARDSELL:
The difference in air watts between the two models [DC07/14] is so neglibible, it's insignificant. In fact all the dyson models since have significantly less air watts than the DC07. The improvement to allow dyson to skimp on the air watts after the DC07 and achieve better pick up is the improved brush roll design and function. That's the reason these 2 models are getting scrubbed. Only took Mr. Dyson and his 500 engineers [the innovative crew] 5 years to figure it out and make the necessary brush roll changes. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 3, 2008 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #48 Jun 3, 2008 4:18 pm |
|
Carmine, That’s just it! If society benefits, patent extensions for life saving or bettering drugs are given, but I do not believe it is the same for non-drug patents. . Can you link me 1 or 2 good articles that talk/follow this Tricor story? Thanks. DIB DIB:
Society doesn't benefit by the drug patent holder claiming exclusive ad infinitum usage and charging high prices. Society benefits when other drug makers offer generics at less cost. Just as consumers don't benefit from $500 bagless dysons when $100-$200 bagless Dirt Devils, HOOVER-s, BISSELL-s etc perform as well. The Wall Street Journal has the best news coverage of the TRICOR drug case. I'm a reader but not an on-line subscriber. Sorry. BTW, the WSJ appears to be on the side of the generics against TRICOR. IMHO Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 3, 2008 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: The Oreck vacuum and everything you wanted to know (hopefully)...
Reply #49 Jun 3, 2008 4:22 pm |
|
I already did the kapock test. Remember you brought this up when I recommended baking soda as a test. BTW the Oreck still will not pass the baking soda test. HARDSELL:
Kapoc is an industry standard test for carpet cleaning and has been for years. Baking soda on floors is not. You got this perverted cockeyed notion from Tom Gasko, who doesn't know anything about ORECK-s. If my ORECK devours pounds of sand monthly from my outdoors, brought in by the grands and the dogs, which is considerably harder to vacuum up, baking soda is a do nothing no contest. If it's not a Rainbow, Air Way or dyson [he's sold all of them at one time or another always claiming each as the best], Tom impugns it. That's his standard Forum mantra for years on all things related to vacuums. BTW, while kapoc is made to simulate real life home carpet lint debris, like pet hair, rug nap and cotton that has a tendency to cling to rugs, baking soda does not occur naturally in the home environment. Except perhaps yours and Tom Gasko. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 3, 2008 by CarmineD
|
|
|