Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
M00seUK
Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295
|
|
Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Original Message Jan 17, 2008 3:54 pm |
|
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #215 Mar 29, 2008 11:15 am |
|
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #218 Mar 29, 2008 4:05 pm |
|
DC18, Thank you for your posting, it was most helpful. James must be legally comfortable with his “No Loss of Suction” tag/claim next to the DC24/25. He is again running this tag on his U.S. Dyson.com front page. . A question, if I may… - A lighter handle weight was certainly an engineering goal of the DC25/24, interesting you did not mention this. Dyson sacrificed filtration (I believe) for a lighter handle weight and to a lesser degree an overall weight. Was the lighter handle weight/s not impressive enough to notice?
. Thanks. DIB P.S. Did you hear of the French inventor who is now said to have invented recorded audio 17 yrs. before Edision? Edision had the better claim... a commercially profitable (or the beginnings) recordable audio. Take a look/read and listen to 2 audio interviews. Here.
This message was modified Mar 29, 2008 by DysonInventsBig
|
DC18
Dyson, Sebo and Bissell user
Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Points: 294
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #219 Mar 29, 2008 5:34 pm |
|
Hi DIB, Acerone Your welcome. In answer to your question DIB. One thing I suppose I forgot they were both light to use and light in your hand. I can understand Dyson making lighter uprights. One question back to you DIB, you say he sacificed filteration for light overall weight and light to use or in use. I can understand that on the DC24 but not so much with the DC25. The DC25 has the same watt motor and airwatts give or take a few and the same bin and cyclone setup as the DC18 so there is no sacifice there! But why is the filteration and filter washing different between the DC25 and DC18? To me it should be the same! I believe the bin could have been taller which would not have added much more overall weight to the DC25! That aside i'm very impressed with the DC25, prefer it over the DC15! I think the campaign on the uprights in the UK is 'Our don't clog others do'!! DC18
This message was modified Mar 29, 2008 by DC18
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #220 Mar 29, 2008 6:32 pm |
|
"James must be legally comfortable with his “No Loss of Suction” tag/claim next to the DC24/25. He is again running this tag on his U.S. Dyson.com front page." Source: DIB"One question back to you DIB, you say he sacificed filteration for light overall weight and light to use or in use. I can understand that on the DC24 but not so much with the DC25. The DC25 has the same watt motor and airwatts give or take a few and the same bin and cyclone setup as the DC18 so there is no sacifice there! But why is the filteration and filter washing different between the DC25 and DC18? To me it should be the same!" Source: DC18 Hello: These two facts are mutually inclusive and co-dependent. Why? You can't have one without the other. The claim "never loses suction", requires users to perform the filter maintenance more often. Else, dyson can't make the claim. If a company wants technological innovation with high prices, then give customers a self-cleaning filter that allows a vacuum never to lose suction. The consequences of the overblown dyson claim: "Never clogs, never loses suction" is coming back to haunt dyson. You can go from cleaning every 3 months to every 6; charge more and claim better and improved. That works. But... go from 6 months to 3 months; charge more and claim better and improved? Really? Are consumers that gullible that they don't know the difference? Apparently, somebody at dyson thinks so. Just my 2 cents worth. Carmine D.
This message was modified Mar 29, 2008 by CarmineD
|
DC25
Joined: Apr 1, 2008
Points: 2
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #223 Apr 1, 2008 2:14 am |
|
I've just test driven the new DC25 here in the US. I agree with DC18 and I am generally impressed with the DC25. There are many improved features over previous models although it does have less cyclones that the Absolute(5 vs. 8). The suction and air-flow were impressive, even with less cyclones, and the handling was light and generally easy to steer. The new valve system which keeps the suction in the floor head until the wand is pulled up is a very welcome addition. The model was fairly quiet when running with or with out the motorized brush bar. Another couple of interesting things to add about the DC25: -The motor is located inside the ball, thus giving a lower center of gravity and easier control. -There is a secondary filter located inside the ball(which is also where the exhaust port is located, thus the new vents.) This filter is a more solid(poly-reinforced) type filter unlike the foam in a frame filter located above the cyclones. It must also be cleaned every 3 months, by rinsing then smacking it down 10 times, then letting dry for 24 hours(as opposed to 12 hours for the foam filter.) To access the filter, the vacuum must be placed in a fully reclined position upon which a tab can be pressed to access the hatch. As a side note, the ball can feel pretty warm directly after use(probably because of the motor and exhaust port.) Haven't seen the DC24 yet, but I am pretty sure I will purchase the DC25 in the near future.
This message was modified Apr 1, 2008 by DC25
|
|
|