Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iH9bdT5tcFOJz0hhY1fBBfP9KbLQ

http://www.dyson.co.uk/store/productmodel.asp?model=DC22

mole wrote:

Mole,

Did you pull away from fantasy role playing and “Nailing Dyson’s to the Floor” long enough only so to name call?  I understand Dyson’s separators well, you don’t.  I understand my praises and my criticism’s here are indexed and far reaching.  James Dyson can make his separators filter much better if he changes some beliefs.  I know what I am doing and I know what to type to get the indexing I want.        DIB

mole wrote:
Mole, first of all, are you from Indiana?  You sure sound like a Hoosier to me!  You type like a Hoosier, you have Hoosier ideas, you run a Hoosier vac shop, and I bet you live in a Hoosier home

The ASA ruling that has been quoted here offhandedly so many times does not have anything to do with the claim of no clogging!  The ASA was completely satisfied that the machine does not clog or lose suction if the customer follows the printed directions included with the machine.  Which, understandably, something Hoosiers have a hard time understanding

What the ASA ruling had to do with (and the ASA is in England NOT in America, and is not a LEGAL authority) was the implied claim that the Dyson does not have filters at all.  That claim was implied rather than directly stated, there is a clear difference.  What Dyson actually said in their advertising was that there is no filter in the cyclones to clog, which is true.   But the average consumer took that to mean there were no filters at all, which is not true.  Dyson changed their claim to reflect the fact that there *are* filters, which, if you follow the directions, don't clog!  If you view the ASA ruling you will see that is true.

-MH

Motorhead wrote:

A mole is a little creature that crawls under ground and is a nuisance (pest) to the world.  When confronted they dig deeper and hide.They do not see well if at all.  Naturally they are at the bottom of the intelligence chain and serve no useful purpose. How could you expect a mole to follow directions?

Hey Motor:

Awful lot of IF's in your story about the ASA taking dyson to the watershed over its false claim: Never clogs. 

I have a story for you too from a famous childrens' fairy tale:  If the hound didn't stop to rest, it would have caught the rabbit.  But it did, and it didn't. 

ASA bids Sayonora on the old steel guitar to the dyson claim: Never clogs.

Carmine D.

For those that haven't seen it, the ASA ruling.

http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/Public/TF_ADJ_42594.htm

Dusty

HARDSELL wrote:

Hey HS:

As usual you slant and give half truths to suit your needs.  Moles see quite well.  Just not with their eyes which are very tiny.  Instead, moles use their other senses which evolved to compensate for their eyesight.  It's a myth that they can't see just because they have poor eyesight.  It's also a myth that they are dumb.  They are quite intelligent.  Hence, spies who infiltrate intelligence agencies and gather classified data/information are commonly called "moles."  

If you furrowed in the ground all day, what good would eyesight be to you?  Well, forget the last question.  You don't, and it's still no good!

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:

You contradict your self.  First you say they see without using their eyes. Then you say they use their senses to compensate for eyesight. Where were your senses when you stated this?

I agree that senses compensate for poor eyesight, however that is not seeing.

Read my statement again.  I never stated emphatically that  they do not see.  If they see at all they have tunnel vision at best. 

Hey HS:

Ooh!  I detect some anger in your post.  Not good for you.  I changed my message just for you. 

CarmineD wrote:

I especially like the spy and mole connection.  Truth be told here, MOLE's are much more creative, interesting, intelligent and have a better sense of humor than HARDSELL's.   The latter have much to much pent up anger.  You'd think they were given a free dyson to test, just to say nice things about it on vacuum Forums, then sell it for cash after 3 years, only to get caught in the end and found out by everyone! 

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:

Your detection is not so good.  Of course considering the source I don't expect it to be.  I see no need to get angry with the mentally challenged.

I am sure that with your IQ a mole does seem intelligent. 

You are the only one making accusations about my DC07.  Remember,  I have no assciation with the vac industry.  No freebies and no biased opinions because of my past. 

You really should foirgive Dyson for making a monkey out of you as a consultant.   Which is mole and which is Carmine?

DysonInventsBig wrote:

O.K smart guy.

Now i will pose another question for you to answer,

What does dysons cyclonic technology [what ever system they are calling it this week],have to do with dust and dirt removeal out of the carpeting.

My educated opinion is that it has absolutly nothing to do with performance or dirt removal, it does not mean SQUAT how many cyclones are used where they are located and inverted or sideways.

Do you think Sir Jimmy wants me on his team?

If you dont respond I'll know why.

Have you ever indexed spark plugs, why dont you give it a try sometimes,Mr inventor........

MOLE