Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
M00seUK
Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295
|
|
Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Original Message Jan 17, 2008 3:54 pm |
|
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #148 Mar 6, 2008 1:02 am |
|
Hi Tom, your right i'm sorry it will never happen again. I will put down my sword and sell out my integrity to sell and devoit my life to Sir James and his band of Einsteins,I will follow the DYSON credo to a T. How foolish of me even to think that I could question you and Sir James,I'm should bow my head in shame. B.T.W have you been banned from the vacuumland site recently? sincerely.........THE-MOLE Today, Forbes magazine online came out with an article called; “The World's Richest People”- “Billionaire Inventors”. Dyson leads the article and is only compared to/referenced with Edison. But your Einstein reference is good too. DIB
|
Motorhead
Joined: Nov 2, 2007
Points: 409
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #149 Mar 6, 2008 1:26 am |
|
I (along with a few others I recall?) think of James Dyson as the Preston Tucker of the vacuum industry, going up against the "big guys" with his creation that is an improvement over the existing technology. Thankfully, though, unlike Mr. Tucker, James came out successful in the end, no doubt due to the era he brought his invention to the world. He couldn't have picked a better time to do this, as I honestly don't know that he would have succeeded 30-40 years ago. Now, however, the older "bags are best" generation who wouldn't have given his machine a second look in the 1960's or 1970's has for the most part gone by the wayside (died off and continues to die off for lack of a better word). That or some look at the new technology with optimism and see the positive changes. Whether or not members of that generation (especially those who are dead-set in their ways and refuse to adjust with the changing times and advancing technology) buy the Dyson is unimportant, it's not their sales James is looking for. The younger generation which the machine is largely being marketed to sees it as something new, innovative, and (most of all) effective, a large improvement over what existed before. They ultimately buy it without regret and love it, as I have. That, to me, is what has attributed to the millions of Dyson sales worldwide, especially in the last 5-6 years. Comparing bags to true cyclonic bagless is like comparing drum brakes to disc brakes, or carburetion to fuel injection. Old vs. new. -MH
This message was modified Mar 6, 2008 by Motorhead
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #150 Mar 6, 2008 7:04 am |
|
Numero Uno is Warren Buffet, my favorite and the owner of Kirby. $62 Billion. Even beats out Gates this year who held the spot for 13 years. [Unlucky number]. It was winning 2 vacuum lawsuits that gave jaydee the start up capital to open the plants in the Malmesbury UK in 1992 and Malaysia in 2001 to mass produce dysons in the UK and then worldwide. He faltered in the vacuum business for years until he won the 2 lawsuits. Essentially giving him in excess of $8 MILLION US. I think I could have parlayed $8 Million US into a BILLION in 7 years too. And I wouldn't have had to move away from my computer to do. How? I would only have had to invest the sum in Berkshire Hathaway stock to make the $1 B mark in that timeframe. Just as Buffet did. Carmine D.
This message was modified Mar 6, 2008 by CarmineD
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #152 Mar 8, 2008 4:16 pm |
|
Numero Uno is Warren Buffet, my favorite and the owner of Kirby. $62 Billion. Even beats out Gates this year who held the spot for 13 years. [Unlucky number]. It was winning 2 vacuum lawsuits that gave jaydee the start up capital to open the plants in the Malmesbury UK in 1992 and Malaysia in 2001 to mass produce dysons in the UK and then worldwide. He faltered in the vacuum business for years until he won the 2 lawsuits. Essentially giving him in excess of $8 MILLION US. I think I could have parlayed $8 Million US into a BILLION in 7 years too. And I wouldn't have had to move away from my computer to do. How? I would only have had to invest the sum in Berkshire Hathaway stock to make the $1 B mark in that timeframe. Just as Buffet did. Carmine D. With all your years in the vacuum business you had the same opportunity as J D to improve the vacuum. No reason to hate J D just because you made no contributions to improvement..
|
|
|