Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
M00seUK
Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295
|
|
Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Original Message Jan 17, 2008 3:54 pm |
|
|
Trilobite
Joined: Nov 7, 2007
Points: 121
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #116 Mar 2, 2008 5:01 pm |
|
DIB: Thanks for that, I completely forgot about that exploded photo. Dusty mentions about the filters being cleaned every month. Is this not going in the wrong direction? I thought Dysons' thinking was to have as little maintenance as possible. Certainly, previous machines 'Root technology' had 3 month intervals, and doesn't the alternative 'core separation / level 3 root technology' have longer washing intervals? Seems like a counter-productive step to me; almost as bad as the cheap bagless' "...clean after every use..."
|
dusty
Joined: Feb 8, 2008
Points: 264
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #117 Mar 2, 2008 5:17 pm |
|
DIB: Thanks for that, I completely forgot about that exploded photo. Dusty mentions about the filters being cleaned every month. Is this not going in the wrong direction? I thought Dysons' thinking was to have as little maintenance as possible. Certainly, previous machines 'Root technology' had 3 month intervals, and doesn't the alternative 'core separation / level 3 root technology' have longer washing intervals? Seems like a counter-productive step to me; almost as bad as the cheap bagless' "...clean after every use..." "concentrated technology", seems to mean smaller and fewer cyclones resulting in less efficient dirt separation in the chamber which in turn means more cleaning of filters. Personally, I think this machines size fits a market segment and the people buying it wont mind the extra maintenance it requires. Either that or nobody will ever touch the filters, the machines will clog and they'll wonder why they ever spent the money on the darn thing in the first place Dusty
|
Motorhead
Joined: Nov 2, 2007
Points: 409
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #119 Mar 2, 2008 8:48 pm |
|
Dyson customer support was not up to speed on the in and outs of the new DC24/25, I was put on hold while customer support located the answer/s to my questions. I did ask twice if the HEPA needed cleaning and each time was answered "yes and every 3-6 months". That’s all I know of this. Indeed, cleaning a HEPA once a month seems excessive. Hi DIB, I agree, it doesn't make any sense why Dyson would modify the pre-motor filter type for this particular model. I thought that it would have the same pre-motor filter as the other models, that should be rinsed every 6 months. This is interesting. I guess we'll find out the real details in due time. -MH
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dyson DC24 / DC25 Vacs: Sir James Brings his Ball back
Reply #122 Mar 3, 2008 7:06 am |
|
The rep hinted that changes may be coming to filter cleaning requirements to the rest of the line too. Apparently they want the customer to be a little more involved with the machine rather than just a once a year rinse out. As you say, time will tell.
Dusty
The dyson "Never clogs. Never loses suction" mantra is coming back to haunt. Takes more than a nifty change in wording and moving on. Doesn't it?
I posted about my parking lot experience with a female COSTCO customer who was returning a DC14 Exclusive [$469 last I checked] that lost suction after one year. I asked her if she cleaned the filter? She looked at me belligerently and said: "I was told this vacuum never needed maintenance. That's why I paid $500 for it. " Not a happy camper. I bet she got her money back after one year of use. I wonder if that was a friend or family member who gave her that advice? Or a dyson rep? Or a COSTCO sales associate? Or all of them combined? So much for hearsay. I mean word of mouth, excuse me. Best form of advertising. I like to add the caveat: WHEN AND IF IT"S TRUE. PS: She had the dyson instruction manual with her. It didn't look as though it was read. Carmine D.
This message was modified Mar 3, 2008 by CarmineD
|
|
|