Abby's Guide to Vacuum Cleaners
Username Password
Home Discussions Reviews More Guides

Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Search For:
Acerone


Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Points: 986

Dyson AirBlade
Original Message   Dec 12, 2007 5:44 am
Saw the Dyson Airblade commercial for the first time last night. Anyone else seen it yet?
Replies: 34 - 43 of 58Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
mole


.

Location: earth
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Points: 783

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #34   Nov 22, 2008 7:52 am
How much longer is the airblade going to be staying in lineup?

Is it paying off yet, is it worth the effort,is the price causing lackluster sales, are there anymore WORK ORDERS for production and how many units are dead on the warewhouse shelves, I see a sell off coming,

LOWER THE PRICE AND COMPETE WITH THE OTHERS OR ITS GOING THE ROUTE OF THE WASHING MACHINE.

MOLE
Venson


Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #35   Nov 22, 2008 8:12 am
Good morning MOLE,

You're right. Why would a business minded contractor or owner of a large venue pay a $1,400 when he can get adequate, if not comparable results from a machine that runs at $800 or even less depending on vendor or quantity ordered? It also appears that the Airblade is not being picked up by many vendors. However, please don't take my word for this. See the following links:

http://www.nextag.com/Xlerator/search-html

http://www.nextag.com/dyson-airblade/compare-html

Best,

Venson
This message was modified Nov 22, 2008 by Venson
CarmineD


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #36   Nov 22, 2008 8:14 am
Hello MOLE, Venson:

After several years of trying, the dyson campers still can't find an appliance/market for users of the brushless motor.   Like dyson's contra rotating washer, these inventions bleed real hard for their creators.  Tho, the current economy will certainly speed the company's business cycle along, like it or not.  Recessions [some say depression] force out overpriced brands and products.  Sadly, in such times there are no buyers for these fledgling products and businesses.  They die a painful and slow death. 

Awhile ago I suggested on this thread that dyson divest itself of the hand dryers and focus time/resources on vacuums, its core business. 

CarmineD wrote April 5, 2008: 

In the economic conditions dyson will face in the years ahead, he can't afford to hold onto the airblade.  Why?  Let's look at the facts:  It's going on 2 years old.  It costs $840 per unit to produce.  Sells for $1400.  Dyson sold 100,000 units.  Sales are $140,000,000.  Costs $84,000,000.  Profit is $56,000,000.  Not accounting for the 1000 units given away at a cost of $840,000.  On vacuum sales of $4 Billion [estimate for 2007] worldwide annually, who needs the headaches of an added $28 Million a year on a totally unrelated product. 
Divest.  Sell the airblade off to a company which is in the business of restroom facility products.  Cut future airblade losses.  Concentrate on vacuum sales to make up the $28 Million generated per year on the airblades. 

Now, it's probably too late.

Carmine D.

This message was modified Nov 22, 2008 by CarmineD
mole


.

Location: earth
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Points: 783

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #37   Nov 22, 2008 9:21 am
Hi Venson, Carmine.

Quite true, this product has seen limited air time, It only appeals to a certain group of people in the building and construction industry, And everything that Venson says comes true, its all about the bottom line,project overuns are very costly to the owners and the contractors. Please explain to me why i should have a airblade at twice the cost of the other offerings, please justify the double the costs to me,what is their comeback[because dyson SMOKES the competition] oh sure i'll buy it just because you said so.

And for the record,would the person getting his hands dryed by the airblade,run out and tell his friends and family [WOW WHAT A GREAT HAND DRYER THAT DYSON IS] I'LL BET THEY DONT.

Can anyone think of any other dyson vacuum that has any success thats not heavily promoted.I cant, not at least since the dc07..........

crikets!!!!!!!!

MOLE

Airblade


Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Points: 180

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #38   Nov 22, 2008 10:27 am
CarmineD wrote:
Nice to see you bail out your dyson buddies here.  The dyson man himself to the rescue.

You quoted only the run down data to put the better spin on your product.  As I would expect from a paid dyson employee who sells Airblades nowadays.  Or are you back in the vacuum trenches?

Still drying hands.......

For example where did you come up with 19 seconds.  Absolutely bogus.  Meaningless.  The Xlerator runs up to 35 seconds and dries hands from 10-12 seconds, just like yours.  However, Xlerator is sensor activator for on/off by hand motion.  Gives the edge to Xlerator, not your brand.

The problem here is how do we define dry?  Manufacturers have different definitions of dry hands.  Most companies measure to .3 grams of water remaining on hands, but the National Sanitary Foundation measures to .1 grams of water, a dryer standard.  A COMMON STANDARD HAS BEEN DEVELOPED WHICH WAS NEVER THERE BEFORE.  My numbers come from this standard of testing and are definitely not meaningless and bogus.  BTW, Airblade shuts off after 30 seconds and Airblade is also sensor activated (touchfree)

No microbacterial covering is needed on the Xlerator because unlike the Airblade it doesn't accumulate well waste from the hand washing/drying.   Advantage to Xcelerator.  You mention the NSF approval for Airblade but missed citing the Leeds seal and credits for the Xlerator and Greenspec approval.   Seems a wash to me.  The Xlerator is smaller, lighter, more versatile to mount in conventional public restrooms.  How about yours?  Bigger.  Heavier.  Needs more wall mounting space.  Advanatge to Xlerator. 

There is no water collection method in the Airblade, so you are incorrect here.  Antimicrobial is included in case the machine is touched.  I didn't mention a difference in Leeds and Greenspec, because there is none.  Both machines contribute towards Leeds credits and both are Greenspec listed, as well as Green Restaurant Association approved.  Yes, the Airblade is bigger and heavier.  Being bigger does sometimes lead to mounting issus, but weight is not an issue.

I'm not a paid Xlerator pro so I may have missed some of the technical strengths of the Xlerator and weaknesses of your brand in the industry.  My expertise is vacuums.  Want to go one on one with your brand against another vacuum brand?  I'm your man.  Let me know.  I'm always ready.  Never duck and hide. 

Any reason Westminster Abbey and Wembly Stadium opted for Xlerator rather than your brand?  can't be the warranty.  Both are 5 years.  Was it price?  Is yours still going for $1400 per.  More than the Xlerator?

I have no idea why those two places opted for Xlerator.  Yes, Airblade is more expensive than the Xlerator, and the difference varies case by case.

Carmine D.

DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #39   Nov 22, 2008 10:57 am
CarmineD wrote:
Hello MOLE, Venson:

After several years of trying, the dyson campers still can't find an appliance/market for users of the brushless motor.   Like dyson's contra rotating washer, these inventions bleed real hard for their creators.  Tho, the current economy will certainly speed the company's business cycle along, like it or not.  Recessions [some say depression] force out overpriced brands and products.  Sadly, in such times there are no buyers for these fledgling products and businesses.  They die a painful and slow death. 

Awhile ago I suggested on this thread that dyson divest itself of the hand dryers and focus time/resources on vacuums, its core business. 

 

In the economic conditions dyson will face in the years ahead, he can't afford to hold onto the airblade.  Why?  Let's look at the facts:  It's going on 2 years old.  It costs $840 per unit to produce.  Sells for $1400.  Dyson sold 100,000 units.  Sales are $140,000,000.  Costs $84,000,000.  Profit is $56,000,000.  Not accounting for the 1000 units given away at a cost of $840,000.  On vacuum sales of $4 Billion [estimate for 2007] worldwide annually, who needs the headaches of an added $28 Million a year on a totally unrelated product. 
Divest.  Sell the airblade off to a company which is in the business of restroom facility products.  Cut future airblade losses.  Concentrate on vacuum sales to make up the $28 Million generated per year on the airblades. 

Now, it's probably too late.

Carmine D.


Shutting the doors down to a $28m [net] profit stream and brand is brilliant!     Surely you would also recommend shutting down all development on the newer, smaller, and cheaper Dyson hand dryer (Airblade v.2 ?) that is patent pending.

DIB
This message was modified Nov 22, 2008 by DysonInventsBig



DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #40   Nov 22, 2008 11:30 am
To be pelted by fecal bacteria or not...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLu-Fx1Hjio
This message was modified Nov 22, 2008 by DysonInventsBig



M00seUK


Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #41   Nov 22, 2008 11:32 am

Shutting the doors down to a $28m [net] profit stream and brand is brilliant!     Surely you would also recommend shutting down all development on the newer, smaller, and cheaper Dyson hand dryer (Airblade v.2 ?) that is patent pending.

DIB

Any certainties at this stage on a v2? By the way, the model numbers previously seen  AB01, AB02, AB03 appear to related to different models of the original for different regions.
This message was modified Nov 22, 2008 by M00seUK
DysonInventsBig


Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #42   Nov 22, 2008 1:04 pm
M00seUK wrote:
Any certainties at this stage on a v2? By the way, the model numbers previously seen  AB01, AB02, AB03 appear to related to different models of the original for different regions.



Moose,
If you look in the European patent office you will see a smaller Dyson hand dryer.

Obviously Dyson took his Airblade cues off the Jet Towel design. That said he ought to (IMO) take his cues from these smaller hand dryers too and build a less complicated, less expensive, smaller (smaller than Xlerator), and non-HEPA, DDM unit too.  He needs (IMO) to build a system down to price unlike his past/current business practices.       DIB
This message was modified Nov 22, 2008 by DysonInventsBig



M00seUK


Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295

Re: Dyson AirBlade
Reply #43   Nov 22, 2008 1:23 pm
DysonInventsBig wrote:



Moose,
If you look in the European patent office you will see a smaller Dyson hand dryer.

Obviously Dyson took his Airblade cues off the Jet Towel design. That said he ought to (IMO) take his cues from these smaller hand dryers too and build a less complicated, less expensive, smaller (smaller than Xlerator), and non-HEPA, DDM unit too.  He needs (IMO) to build a system down to price unlike his past/current business practices.       DIB

I've looked for all patents filed in 2008 / 2007 for the word 'drier' and have 6 results, but they all appear to be approximately the same scale as the existing model?
Replies: 34 - 43 of 58Next page of topicsPreviousNextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
Vacuum Cleaners Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2024 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.