Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
A question . . .
Original Message Oct 26, 2007 3:37 pm |
|
Hi, Who thinks the day will come, and how long will it take, when the "vacuum cleaner" will generally be accepted as just a hole in the wall that we plug a hose into? No more cyclones, water baths or super-duper filtering for alllergy sufferers. No thought over buying canister or upright and what warranty length is. No more concerns about cord length or operating noise levels. I'm not just talking central vacuum system but also of a possible change in our view of practicality. The day is not that far away when our computers will also be our telephone and TV among other things. Come to think of it they are now though not widely employed. Does anyone feel central vacuum systems may one day be provided in apartment buildings and other multiple dwelling as a given as well as in individual private homes? Thanks, Venson
This message was modified Oct 26, 2007 by Venson
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: A question . . .
Reply #5 Nov 9, 2007 4:20 am |
|
Hey Venson and Motorhead, Since you guys like history – check out an early GE silent film called “The Home Electrical”, promoting "electricity" and a "civilized life". I converted and uploaded it myself. Runtime is over 11 minutes. A central vacuum cleaner with a keyed switch is shown at minute 2:21. Many appliances are shown, some with lots of potential danger, I cringed a few times watching this movie. I do not know the films date, but if you do (or want to take a guess) let me know. Video here (make sure to view in “original size” vs. small size) DIB
This message was modified Nov 9, 2007 by DysonInventsBig
|
Gail
Joined: Feb 2, 2009
Points: 1
|
|
Re: A question . . .
Reply #7 Feb 2, 2009 3:20 pm |
|
I used to live in an upscale rental apartment (about 8 stories) built in the 60's that had a central vaccuum system. The suction was very poor.
|
Trebor
Joined: Jan 16, 2009
Points: 321
|
|
Re: A question . . .
Reply #10 Feb 2, 2009 4:43 pm |
|
If vacuums had not become a disposable item, we might well be on the way to centrals being the norm. Centrals got a bad rep when shag carpet came into vouge. With only air-driven power heads (pre Turbo-Cat) they failed miserably. The earliest power nozzles had the cord clipped along the length of the hose. Central vac is an idea whose time has come again, with the technology now to provide better suction and airflow, lighter hoses and so many conveniences I predict they will catch on more and more as people realize they can be installed easily in existing homes. For the cost of, say, a Kirby, a CV can be installed in most any home, and plenty of Kirbys have been sold in 1200 sq ft homes. Most people have never even heard of central vacuums. Where is the national media advertising for central vacuums? Most people who were unhappy with a central vac had one that was 1) underpowered for the home 2) had a botched installation 3) were never shown how to vacuum with the long hose. One thing to consider is the eventual loss of some airflow over time due to scarring on the tubing walls. Hundreds of times I showed the need for a new hose on an Electrolux because the existing hose would not allow the machine to pick up all 4 steel spheres in the clear plastic cup. (This is airflow, not suction, the cup is narrower toward the bottom) With a new hose, viola! snap! snap! snap! snap! The sand and grit sucked up do wear away at the interior, which is way going one unit larger than the manufacturer suggests is a good idea. I think the FlowMaxGold tubing is an excellent idea. All virgin vinyl, 5' lengths to reduce the need for cutting, and to make it easy to feed into wall cavities, and flange ends to join lengths together without additional couplings.
This message was modified Feb 3, 2009 by Trebor
|
|
|