Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
DysonIsOverrated
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Points: 2
|
|
The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Original Message Sep 25, 2007 10:54 am |
|
Technically, the Rainbow vacuum was the first to not lose suction. It uses a more primitive dual cyclone design with water as a pre-filter. If the Rainbow didn't have such a ridiculously high price and clumsy power nozzle, it would be a pretty good vacuum. I don't know why they require you to hold a button down to keep the power nozzle operating. One would think that they would use a simple 2-way switch. All that on/off cycling can't possibly be good for the power nozzle motor. The Rainbow uses an innovative brushless motor. It would be a pretty good $800 vacuum with a better power nozzle.
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #5 Oct 3, 2007 1:54 pm |
|
Hi mole, Point well taken but of the two, I never thought Filter Qeen was such a bad deal for the relatively young and/or able-bodied. Weight differences weren't all that significant between it and other machines during its heyday when you recall what the very popular Electroluxes and Hoovers of the time weighed. I bought my first brand new one m-m-m years ago when they came out with the very first power nozzle -- the little 10 - or 11-inch German add-on -- and the caster set with cord reel. I had of course often worked with older models prior to buying. Filter Queen's best points were that you could clean quite well, in my case, for near a month without emptying, great air filtration, well-made and highly efficient attachments. FQ when tested as a straight suction machine usually got good scores for surface litter pick on carpeting and long before the little electric or air-driven mini-nozzles appeared the FQ's slide-on brush for the upholstery nozzle was hard to beat. It also provided perfect air exhaust placement and very quiet operation. The caster set with cord reel did prove a problem on stairs. Models with the regular cord could easily be detached from the wheel set and stair cleaning was no big deal. I can on ocassion forgive extra weight if a machine is well-made and durable. If you got a few miles of carpet to cover and need good dirt capacity Kirby, though I'd strongly suggest getting a decent but light canister for above the floor use, I can also forgive Kirby because because the newer models are quite good on carpet. What cannot be excused is overly inflated price. If either FQ or Kirby were puchasable for around $600 when new they'd be a sensible enough choice for larger homes. As for Rainbow, as I always say, it constitutes a nice but now unneeded science experiment. On an ongoing basis, who needs all the futzing around? Best, Venson
|
mole
.
Location: earth
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Points: 783
|
|
Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #7 Oct 4, 2007 8:58 am |
|
Hi Mark,given that your e-2 is under a year old,the lower endof the motor should still be nice and clean,you are one of the few that use your machine properly.I would suggest changing the internal hepa filter,there is also one inside the machine,the exhaust filter is on the back of the machine behind the the grill where you wrap the cord around the hooks,that danged machine should have a cord reel for that price.For the price of this portable cleaner, and others, CENTRAL VACUUMS are the way to go. mole........
|
mole
.
Location: earth
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Points: 783
|
|
Re: The Amazing Rainbow - the first vacuum to not lose suction
Reply #9 Oct 4, 2007 1:43 pm |
|
Hi Venson, there are a few centrals that would merit looking into for condo applications. 1 the sweep away by GALAXIE SYSTEMS[very new to the market] 2 the vax system by nutone 3 the condo lux by aerus/electrolux mole
|
|
|