Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

CarmineD wrote:
As mentioned in another thread, you're looking as bestbuys.com and not bestbuy.com.  Best Buy do not sell Oreck but continue to carry Dyson, Hoover, Bissell etc.

Dusty

dusty wrote:
Thanks for the tip off, looks like it'll be interesting to follow this through the week.

dusty wrote:

Hello Dusty:

Thank you for the correction.  I was wrong on posting BEST BUY.  You are correct it is Bestbuy.com.  As you mentioned in the other thread, bestbuys directs buyers to products and retailers with the best prices.  Correct?  The bulk of the vacuum products advertised and trafficked to prospective buyers are from HOOVER.  Dysons, save ORECK, are the least number and all are discounted from MSRP. 

Bestbuy.com's 2.5 stars for the DC16, based on 40 epinions, is the worse rated dyson.  All retailers who carry the DC16, which retails for $149, may soon follow dyson's lead and discount the piece by $100 with another dyson purchase/giveaway?  Quite possibly as soon as July 4. 

Like M00seUK said:  Time will tell. Have to watch the events unfold as we officially enter the summer season, traditionally the worse time of the year for non-summer seasonal sales, like vacuums.

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:

Most all vacuums at CC are on sale.  Seems as only the cheapos are not on sale.

CarmineD wrote:
That is correct.  Best Buys in nothing more than a portal for Shopping.com.  If you were to click on the Oreck link, the owner of Best Buys would get paid by Shopping.com for the traffic. The reviews on the site are pulled from Epinions.com  and not from site users themselves.  I don't believe the high end Orecks to be discounted as they can only be purchased from Oreck.com where all the other brands can be purchased from either online or box stores which explains the sub MSRP pricing.

Dusty

CarmineD wrote:

In the past few days you stated that those starr ratings are useless.  That was prior to your being able to use them to your advantage.  Think about it next time before you accuse someone of flip flopping.

dusty wrote:

Agree.  The ORECK XL 21 is marketed to a select group of vacuum buyers.  When you amortize the $750 over 21 years of guarantee the cost is $35 dollars per year.  There are no costs, save bags, associated with the vacuum over the 21 years.  And ORECK will put in a new bag free with each yearly tune-up.  For people who have this money for a vacuum, it is worth the money.  Obviously, I went with the least expensive XL Classic and no giveaways for $150 plus shipping.

Carmine D. 

This message was modified Jun 24, 2008 by dusty

HARDSELL wrote:

Generally you quote me HS, but this time you didn't.  Please go back to my posts on these several occasions.  On the ORECK thread.  My words are to this effect and I paraphrase: 

I don't believe negative ORECK reviews from anonymous posters.  I prefer my own personal and professional experience and those of people I know with ORECK-s. 

All rational consumers would think and say the same as me above.  Except you.  That's the reason I qualified my statement with 'rational.'   For the benefit of people like you who praise a bagless brand endlessly then sell it, and/or return a newly purchased one because they are dissatisfied with it.  With the sales proceeds/store credit buy and use a bagged brand instead that they like less.  And then try to justify the mistake by giving similar examples of mistakes in judgments from 40 years ago. 

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:
While your math is sound it does not take into account things like agitator  replacement, broken fans, blockages, or belt changes that would all incur extra labor charges and not be covered under warranty.  You may get a freebie once a year on the belt but from my experience Oreck generally require 2 or 3 if used for routine vacuuming and those costs must be factored in.

Dusty