Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Like you Dusty, I tossed it out for argument's sake.  Have to admit, it sounds like is a pretty good argument.  Got your attention and raised your curiosity.  For all I know the dyson illustrations and directions played a role, even if small, in the cert.  Or done by dyson to get the cert.  You don't know for a fact anymore than I do.  Were you there?

Getting back to my original request in my post to you:  I asked whether the Asthma and Allergy Foundation charged fees for its service to stay in business.  Apparently, you still don't know whether it does or not but were anxious to cite it anyway.  [For argument's sake].  While condemning CRI's cert as biased for accepting fees.  Double standard, my good fellow.  Hey what's a double standard when you are making a profit selling dysons.  Right?

Where one stands oftentimes depends on where they sit.

Carmine D.

HARDSELL wrote:

HS:

We know at least one major retailer that dropped the dyson line months ago lock stock and barrel: Linens-n-Things.  Pushes the BISSELL bagless now instead.

You might want to take a look at the vacuums on the HOME DEPOT Web Site too.  Particularly dyson brand.  Let us know what you think about it.

Carmine D.

Dyson is also conspicuously missing from the costco web site, although I believe they are available in the stores.

CarmineD wrote:
I see.  So I toss something out for arguments sake and get questioned while you toss a personal thought out as fact and that is ok?  Sounds like you run with your own set of double standards.  I never claimed authenticity of the Asthma society testing anywhere in my post, show me where I did if you believe I'm incorrect. I just asked you how Dyson could achieve it.  You, when asked responded with the following...

  The certs are granted for one reason and one reason only. They are based on users reading and following the dyson Users Manual for dirt bin dumping. Why do you think dyson devotes 2 pages of explicit detail and instructions.

You repeated this a second time in another post, once again never stating it was your own opinion instead of fact.  When questioned on this piece of fiction you couldn't even be stand up enough to admit you were incorrect, instead you once again answered with yet another question.

Where one stands oftentimes depends on where they sit indeed.

Dusty

Hi guys,

Further debate over whether Dyson out-Hoovers Hoover -- or whatever -- may now all be a loss.  He's just announced that he's out to make an electric car.  Please see following link: http://jalopnik.com/396805/dyson-developing-electric-car-will-probably-suck

Best,

Venson

Dusty,

Carmine always posts as if it is fact when he is as lost as last year's Easter egg.  He can not stand defeat so he just asks questions to twist things.  He is like the school bully.  Always cowers when confronted.

Severus wrote:

Hello Severus:

You're right! 

BTW, I recall you mentioning a long time ago when the discussion came up that SEBO vacuums didn't have a CRI approval.  I note that they are still not in the queue for the CRI green lable either.  At least not yet.  While Windsor appear to be zipping through CRI on the fast track.

Carmine D.

Venson wrote:

Hello Venson:

This was posted yesterday on this thread.  By M00seUK and DIB.  A short interrupted discussion followed.  I opined that if dyson can't improve the run time on its DC16 beyond 5 minutes [and has resorted to discounting them by $100] after 2 plus years, what makes us think it can develop a car that runs on batteries? 

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:

I said yesterday that it was smarter to develop a long lasting auto battery.  There is a $300,000,000 contest for developing a long lasting battery.

Once again J D has proven to be smarter than you Carmine.  Is it any wonder that you are so envious.

CarmineD wrote:

Thanks Carmine and my apologies to DIB and M00seUK. Dyson is quite a dabbler.  Call me me when he makes a good blender.

Venson