Abby’s Guide > Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) > Discussions > pros/cons 2-cycle vs 4-cycle?
Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions |
|
seezar
Joined: Mar 8, 2005
Points: 3
|
|
pros/cons 2-cycle vs 4-cycle?
Original Message Mar 8, 2005 1:45 pm |
|
I apologize if this is an elementary question but I am a new homeowner and do not have alot of knowledge on engines in general. I have a 1/4 acre lot and plan to do my own lawn maintenance. I've already purchased my mower and am now looking at getting a trimmer. I've noticied the big difference in gas-powered trimmers seems to be 2-cycle or a 4-cycle engine but I'm not clear what the pros and cons are of each. Also in some of my research I see that some units take straight gas whereas others require a mixture. I'm just completely confused at this point at what to even start looking for. I dont have a large lot that requires a tremendous amount of trimming but I want to purchase a unit that will be durable and most fit my needs. Maybe my needs would be better suited with an electric model? Any explanations and advice would be greatly appreciated.
This message was modified Mar 8, 2005 by seezar
|
Ben07
The more you know about something, the more you find there is to know.
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Points: 178
|
|
Re: pros/cons 2-cycle vs 4-cycle?
Reply #8 Mar 8, 2005 9:07 pm |
|
Ben07, I don't disagree with everything you wrote in the above quote, I just take at least some exception to most of it.
Seezar, In general, in my opinion, small trimmer and chain saw engines have changed so much in the last two years due to emissions, unless you are a pro user or fixer it is very hard to keep up. If you want to go inexpensive, go to a box, find one you like, check the return policy (make sure it is open ended for date), keep box and reciepts (everything that keeps the return policy in effect) and use it to your hearts content. Don't like it for any reason, take it back.
Once you find yourself spending $100 or so to get one you like, Bite the bullet and maybe check into some good machines at a dealer. Echo, Redmax, Stihl, lots of other brands to consider, some well know like Honda, some not, like Shindaiwa.
Unless you have a preference, like not wanting to mix oil in the gas, I don't think I would worry about the two stroke-four stroke thing too much.
By the way, Welcome. And I am not a pro anything, please take my opinions for what they are worth. Sorry Rob but when I read his question I thought he specifically wanted to know what the pro's and cons were of a 2 cycle engine vs a 4 cycle engine, Actually it is the title. I think every response has been on their differences, He even stated that he has looked at them and has come to the main differences are wether they are 2 cycle or 4 cycle, and that is specifically what he seemed to want to understand. Apparently you only have a problem with my post ??? Actually most of mine. At least that is what you said, specifically what, I am not sure. Maybe somethings wrong and I should erase the post. I did give credit to both types, however far little to the four cycle in this small size market. Now If I was going to give an opinion as you did, for which I might add he asked for explanations and opinions, I gave him an explanation, and you gave him an opinion, and you stated your opinion was based on my explanation. Saying don't worry about the explanation you asked for, just go out and buy, then keep exchanging etc. So I will first give you my opinion on small 4 cycle engines of this size for ope use. They are going to have to go a long and expensive way on 4 cycle tecxhnology in small engines like for string trimmers, to even come close to how the two cycle can handle it today. It may be able to be done some day, but the the consumer will pay a lot more. . The 4 cycle in this size is a mere toy compared to it's counterpart. Also where we disagree is to have someone ask for an explanation, and tell them to go to the store and poke and hope till they find one by trial and error and countless hours at the service desk. when that is why they may have asked the question in the first place so as to not to have to do that, as much. And this type practice makes the cost of goods and services higher for everyone in the long run. Apparently they wanted to gain some knowledge before going out shopping again. keep this in mind and let me quote you "I don't disagree with everything you wrote in the above quote, I just take at least some exception to most of it." and at least I had the courtesy to explain why Ben07
This message was modified Mar 9, 2005 by Ben07
Ariens 8524LE, Toro CCR2000, Jacobsen S-B S-blowers, Generac 10hp Gen-convt. to N.G., 5 L-boys(D's F's &Dura( 74,77,80,88,00), Antiq. 1960 AYP 20 in. mag w 3.5 Tech mower. Ryan/Ryobi gas Trim. AYP 205 gas blwr. Mac c-saw,Toro E-blwr, 2 Weed-E e. stg. trims. outboards, boats, util trail, 2 Jeeps
|
SnowPro
Location: Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
Points: 395
|
|
Re: pros/cons 2-cycle vs 4-cycle?
Reply #9 Mar 8, 2005 11:22 pm |
|
My professional opinion..............( I run one about 5 hours a day in the summer) 2 stroke all the way. Nothing but Shindaiwa for me. Smooth, powerful, built to last, light weight. 4 stroke.............BOAT ANCHOR HEAVY, ROUGH RUNNING, LOW POWER, VIBRATION (did I already say that ) BUT..........Very smooth idle...........if that is good for anything. I tried out a Honda, Shindaiwa and Stihl...................didn't like any of them. The Honda dealer was begging me to try one out. I used it for about 20 min. and was NOT impressed. The others were tried for less time, but my review stands. But hey....................that's just me. Ken PS-------I ONLY run Opti-2 for mix. At the mix ratio I seriously doubt I am polluting any more than a 4 stoke engine.
|
seezar
Joined: Mar 8, 2005
Points: 3
|
|
Re: pros/cons 2-cycle vs 4-cycle?
Reply #11 Mar 9, 2005 12:46 am |
|
Thanks everyone for the welcomes and the helpful info! After reading all these replies I can see I'm not yet any closer to picking out the exact trimmer for me, but I've gained some knowledge. That was my intent in the original post was to understand the difference in the 2 types of engines, it just happened that the reason I wanted to understand was I'm in the market to get a trimmer. I think its going to come down to just going out and looking at a few different models, and as what was mentioned, try some out and use the return policy if needed. The last time I used a trimmer was about 15-20 years ago so I'm sure things have changed quite a bit since then. Thanks again everyone, this is a great forum and I'm glad I've stumbled upon it.
This message was modified Mar 9, 2005 by seezar
|
Ben07
The more you know about something, the more you find there is to know.
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Points: 178
|
|
Re: pros/cons 2-cycle vs 4-cycle?
Reply #12 Mar 9, 2005 1:47 am |
|
Seezar by the way it might be a worthwhile idea to start out with an inexpensive electric one. Then you can get the feel for what you prefer. They serve as an excellent back-up, as in storage they don't have some of the problems you will have as with storing a gasoline one. (carb gumming from some gas left in it, the magnet surfaces getting rusted there-by not enabling the sensor to pick up the point to fire the engine etc etc.) I gave an old electric one to a new neighbor a couple years ago, it was about 25 yrs old, wasn't used in like 20 years, I stored in the worst way, a plastic bag. Ran like it was new and he has been using it now for two years. Ben07
This message was modified Mar 9, 2005 by Ben07
Ariens 8524LE, Toro CCR2000, Jacobsen S-B S-blowers, Generac 10hp Gen-convt. to N.G., 5 L-boys(D's F's &Dura( 74,77,80,88,00), Antiq. 1960 AYP 20 in. mag w 3.5 Tech mower. Ryan/Ryobi gas Trim. AYP 205 gas blwr. Mac c-saw,Toro E-blwr, 2 Weed-E e. stg. trims. outboards, boats, util trail, 2 Jeeps
|
robmints
Joined: May 13, 2003
Points: 4691
|
|
Re: pros/cons 2-cycle vs 4-cycle?
Reply #14 Mar 9, 2005 8:46 pm |
|
Ben07, Sorry I was so abrupt. No excuse, but I was in a hurry.
I am not an expert. I think I have owned over a thousand horsepower of two stroke machines in the last 20 years or so. I really like two strokes as a design. Maybe I haven't been looking as close as I should have been, but in that 20 years I have only seen one two stroke engine that did not have some sort of valve, mostly reed valves. I think the two stroke we used to think of, for the new purchaser, is gone. Most of the small, newer design two strokes look to have significant design changes to meet emissions standards. Many seem to have what we might consider a four stroke style valve, with a stem and seat. Some look like they differ on how they are actuated, but they do what they do on four stroke. Some engines seem to try to get away with what we used to call "loop charging" where the exhaust is reported to or held in the cylinder. Some seem to use a little "CVCC" thing that opens wth vacuum or pressure and closes with a spring. Others seem to use a cam and spring just like four stroke. But, for the most part, our beloved two stroke is dead. Onward and upward in the fantasy land of the EPA.
One thing with gas trimmers more than one person has indicated that they did not like was something called a split crank. I think they say you can tell by the recoil start being between the engine and the shaft. I have no idea what they are talking about. Hopefully someone that does will have some input.
Like you posted, Ben, electric might be something seezar might really want to consider. Again, sorry, did not mean to seem like a jerk. Wasn't intentional.
|
snowshoveler
tides in dirts out surfs up
Location: bridgewater nova scotia...aka the swamp
Joined: Jan 3, 2003
Points: 1261
|
|
Re: pros/cons 2-cycle vs 4-cycle?
Reply #15 Mar 9, 2005 9:09 pm |
|
hey guys... ive been reading this since it started,and have a few things to comment on. first is 4 strokes...in my professional opinion and im the pro here...they are all crap even the honda or maybe especially the honda cause they know better. and the shindiawa,which is normally top quality equipment well we sell them and there is 5 pages of service bullitens that have to be done to them...thats crap to me. as far as power the 2 stroke rules and the 4 stroke isnt going there any yime soon. now that being said there are some real crappy 2 stroke trimmers out there.best way to tell if its any good is to take a look at where the starter recoil is. if the starter handle is on the shaft or boom side then its a low buck special...exactly 1/2 crank in there,and also usually made of pressed and pinned sheetmetal.the crank is only supported on one side of the connecting rod. if the starter is on the top side away from the shaft then it is a full crank and usually has a real crankshaft and it is supported on bothsides of the connecting rod . dosent matter what kind of brand it is the one with the good crank is always better than the one without. i have never seen a poor machine that had the full crank ,they all have good quality product and some of them have not so good product as well. read what folks have to say here and be advised. as far as the 2 strokes being non emission friendly,well just do your part use a good quality synthetic mix oil and dont let it go stale. later chris
craftsman 10/28 snowblower with tracks husky 372xpg chainsaw sachs dolmar bc212 bushsaw mondo trimmer monster tractor with trailer cheep wheelbarro and couple shovels and a partridge in a pear tree
|
Marshall
As Long As There Are Tests, There Will Be Prayer In Public Schools. ;- )
Joined: Sep 16, 2002
Points: 7730
|
|
Re: pros/cons 2-cycle vs 4-cycle?
Reply #17 Mar 9, 2005 10:27 pm |
|
I never noticed this before but it's pretty strong selling foo foo dust. http://www.echo-usa.com/300.asp 300 Hour Certification
| INDUSTRY FIRSTS | CATALOGS | MANUALS | FAQs |
| With a premium brand like Echo, you expect professional-grade performance. And no engines in the industry perform like Echo. Every engine Echo produces is certified with CARB and EPA to its highest useful life* rating – 300 hours. And that’s the highest performance rating there is. Some manufacturers claim professional-grade performance and yet rate their engines at only 50 hours. Be sure to check the label and you’ll find every Echo product will have a 300 hour or “A” category rating. It’s a fact: Echo delivers the highest level of useful life in every product. * EDP is defined by CARB as “Emissions Durability Period”. EPA uses the term “useful life”, which is defined as “…when engine performance deteriorates to the point where usefulness and/or reliability is impacted to a degree sufficient to necessitate overhaul or replacement…” (U.S. Government, Code of Federal Regulations, Vol. 40, Chapter 1, Sec. 90.105, par. 5, §ii) |
|
|
|