Abby’s Guide > Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) > Discussions > 4 stroke with no valves, no oil reservoir, capable of 2 stroke rev's plus
Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions |
|
trouts2
Location: Marlboro MA
Joined: Dec 8, 2007
Points: 1328
|
|
Re: 4 stroke with no valves, no oil reservoir, capable of 2 stroke rev's plus
Reply #16 Jan 7, 2012 7:37 am |
|
>>Heat in the right places makes for higher performance, as in higher exhaust gas temps. Right, that’s a restatement of your first arg. They even add components to shield the heat which they want to extract higher performance. That’s desirable in their design but as irrelevant to the point as it was the first time. Reducing the exhaust temp in any engine would be an advantage even funny car engines if they could maintain performance. They’d live to do it.
|
friiy
Location: Las Vegas, The Desert
Joined: Apr 12, 2008
Points: 600
|
|
Re: 4 stroke with no valves, no oil reservoir, capable of 2 stroke rev's plus
Reply #17 Jan 8, 2012 9:58 pm |
|
Speaking of hot engines (good and bad) ... hot temps in turbine engines are great up till the point of what the burner can and turbine wheel can handle.... they push it to the limit... even 5 degrees over temp for 30 secs can take years off the hot section of the engine.. As far as a 4 stroke motor "drinking gas"... the leaner you run the engine the hotter the exaust gets, richen it up and it cools right down.... On my Cessna 170, the Mixture is set by a knob in the cabin, the mixture is leaned for cruise flight using a EGT guage, not too hot (burn a hole in piston)--- and not too cold (foul out a plug) The only thing I am trying to say is general statements can be worthless without context.. Every engine is diffrent as is its need for operation.. Friiy
|
trouts2
Location: Marlboro MA
Joined: Dec 8, 2007
Points: 1328
|
|
Re: 4 stroke with no valves, no oil reservoir, capable of 2 stroke rev's plus
Reply #18 Jan 9, 2012 10:13 am |
|
I think Borat has missed the qualifier in what I’ve said. “Reducing the exhaust temp in any engine would be an advantage even funny car engines” this part….. “if they could maintain performance”. The engine example Borat mentioned is a design where higher heat improves performance for that application. Just magically lowering the exhaust temp in some way would impair performance and not what I qualified. I think Boarts understanding of what I said is that a lower exhaust temp would to be desirable because it would degrade performance and they want temps high for extra umph. That’s not what I said at all. That would be throwing a wrench into the design. What I’m saying is if they could maintain performance and lower temps they would do that as less heat would be a great benefit. Borat might argue that can’t be done. Possibly in current designs but I don’t think every design avenue is exhausted. Either way, that’s irrelevant to a theoretical position that “if they could” they would go for it. His case is obviously tangent to the qualifier and context. Friiy, Found a nice Honda bucket to replace that one fixed up with your glue. The glue held up fine to water and sub-zero temps. A guy wants to buy it for $150 but I'm holding on to it as the chances of comming across another Honda with a bum bucket is pretty high. Thanks.
|
|
|