Abby’s Guide > Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) > Discussions > Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions |
|
Electrocutor
Joined: Nov 7, 2010
Points: 14
|
|
Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Original Message Nov 7, 2010 2:36 am |
|
Greetings: I'd like some help in ironing out specifics on snowblowers and the components that make them up (and make up their engines). I have collected some data from various places, but it seems that the manufacturers are VERY against disclosing any of the nitty-gritty details about the make-up of the snowblowers (which seems silly). I'd like to limit the thread to high quality construct (meaning at or near comercial grade) 24" or 28" 2010 snowblowers to try to keep things moving forward if possible. I'll start by listed information I've gathered on the two models I am looking at most currently. If you have any confirmed factual information, please post it; but I'd like to try to stay away from unconfirmed opinions or personal experience arguments if possible. Ariens Platinum 24 (921017) [Engine: Briggs & Stratton 1150] - Moderate Fuel Efficiency *F - Torque: 11.5 ft-lbs (SAE J1940) *WARNING: Class action lawsuit against B&S (and others including Honda) for creating a false standard J1940 to conceal horsepower fraud, so this number has no real-world value. Can anyone get a real number for this please, perhaps in SAE 1349 standard? Honda has corrected their HP/Torque ratings on their website, but B&S hasn't yet. *D, *E - Type: OHV *D - Crankshaft: Ball Bearing *Snowmann, *slinger [Gearbox: SX Aluminum] - Steel Worm Gear *G - Bronze sleeve bearing *G (for sleeve), *Snowmann (for material) [Movement: Drive Disc] - Automatic Traction Control / Quick Turn *C - Bronze Sleeve Bearing *G [Auger] - Serated *C - Nylon Sleeve Bearing *G - 14" *C [Impeller] - 14" *C [Accessories] - Light *C - 120V Start *C - Hand Warmer *C [MSR] - $1599 *C Honda (HS724WA) [Engine: GX200] - Superior Fuel Efficiency *F - Torque: 9.1 ft-lbs @ 2,500 rpm (SAE J1349 International Standard) *B - Type: OHV *B - Counter-Vibration *B - Noise Reduction *B - Crankshaft: Ball Bearing *A
[Gearbox] - Steel Helical Gears *A - Steel Ball Bearing *A [Movement: Hydrostatic] - Infinitely Variable *A - Fixed 2wd *A [Auger] - Serated *A - 14" *trouts2 [Impeller] - 12" *trouts2 [MSR] - $2299 *A Notes - SAE J1349 assumes 15% loss of power to internal friction; in reality, this is just an average and varies per engine (so less internal friction would mean the actual HP is higher) *this can be validated at any site that defines the SAE 1349 standard Sources - A : Honda Snowblower Specifications (http://www.hondapowerequipment.com/products/snowblowers/content.aspx?asset=sb_whychoose) (http://www.hondapowerequipment.com/products/modeldetail.aspx?page=modeldetail§ion=P2SB&modelname=HS724WA&modelid=HS724WA) - B: Honda Engine Specifications (http://engines.honda.com/models/model-detail/gx200) - C: Ariens Specifications (http://www.ariens.com/products_snow/s_deluxe_platinum_group/s_deluxe_platinum_24/Pages/default.aspx) - D: Briggs & Stratton Specifications (http://www.briggsandstratton.com/engines/other-engines/detail.aspx?series=1150+Series&id=%7BB8CACFAE-E522-4511-88F6-9DA80E1C1ADC%7D) - E: Class-Action Engine HP Fraud Lawsuit (http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Lawnmower_Horsepower_Fraud) *there are many other references, just google - F: Personally inferred from many (>20) personal forum posts by different owners - G: Ariens Parts Catalog (http://partsradar.arinet.com/scripts/EmpartISAPI.dll?MF&app=ariens&lang=EN&TF=Empartweb&loginID=ariensc&loginpwd=consumer) *I can't seem to find the link to the online Honda parts catalog again (it was hard to find and I didn't bookmark it). If anyone finds it, please post the URL
This message was modified Nov 7, 2010 by Electrocutor
|
aa335
Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434
|
|
Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #21 Nov 7, 2010 1:31 pm |
|
User is a ~175lb male. I'm concious about over-using machines and will not be over-agressive. Clearing surface is unimportant: it is possible/likely that I will someday move and bring my quality snow-blower with me. The goal is to not buy 'junk' that will need fixing and replacing parts every 3-5 years: once upon a time things were made to last, that is no longer the case and you must take care to investigate how things are built nowadays to obtain the same quality of prduct. Durability (low rate of part replacement), efficiency, and longevity are primary concerns; ease of use is secondary; price is tertiary. I'm aware of the Honda vs Ariens loyalty camps, but products change over time and people need to be aware of what those changes are and whether they further improve the machine, or further reduce production cost and hurt the machine (this is also why everyone makes so many blasted models); that's why the Kowasaki Toro's of the past were so popular and the newer ones (that I've seen) can't hold a candle to them. If I had to choose at the current moment, I would be in the Honda camp, but I also know that Honda does add some price tag simply for the name. To give an example: if the Ariens compact 24" had all the same quality of components as the Honda, then it would be silly to pay more than double the price just for the Honda name and Hydrostat transmission. This is, however, not the case and also a reason why Ariens makes the Deluxe, Platinum, and Professional lines. (Now if the companies would get together and put a Honda/Yamaha engine, a differential-equipped Hydrostatic transmission, Ariens larger impeller/auger sizes, and Ariens accessories on one machine there would be a whole lot less bickering on this forum and everyone who didn't go straight for a budget blower would be happy; but some dreams simply will never come true) Too much ramblings, stick to shovels and leaf blowers
|
Steve_Cebu
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 888
|
|
Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #24 Nov 7, 2010 6:39 pm |
|
Come on guys. We know this is not David from NJ. He would have started a separate topic for each subfunction check.
actually it most likely is DavidNJ as he's asking the same type of questions. They are also questions that do not really need answering. What I care about is how well the snowblower is going to throw snow. How far and how reliable the machine is, is most important. If I am a fighter pilot I only fly the damn plane I don't have to repair it. That's the mechanics job.
My Toro walks right into the nasty stuff and throws it just as nice as can be. It's been reliable and I have no idea how to take it apart and fix it even if I had the time and interest to do so. I had a Honda and that was good too. Not twice the price good but screwed together really well. Ariens is probably good for people who can turn it unlike my wife and she is working out too. here is a Vid. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9aImupcUPA Maybe by the time she is done she can pick up the snowblower FOR Me!
"If you have more miles on your snow blower than your car, you live in New England." "If you can drive 75 mph through 2 feet of snow during a raging blizzard without flinching, you live in New England."
|
Electrocutor
Joined: Nov 7, 2010
Points: 14
|
|
Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #27 Nov 7, 2010 9:29 pm |
|
Thank you, snowmachine, for that bit of information; I didn't know that Husqvarna and its child brands were not being sold in the US this year. Thus far, you were the only helpful poster.
|
aa335
Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434
|
|
Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #29 Nov 7, 2010 11:07 pm |
|
I agree that opinions of real-world use is very important, but there are tons of other posts about that. What I failed to find no matter where I looked was a quantitative comparison and detailed analytical comparison of different like-machines components and construction practices. One thing that has become abundantly clear is that for every component that has been improved in the last 30 years, 3 components are now made less durable or from cheaper quality and build materials/design than they used to be. The problem is that no one knows this kind of info except the engineers that designed it (who aren't allowed to reveal that info) and people who have dug into the workings. This is a fact of life, our resources are limited, and people expect more for their money, as well as higher wages and salaries, and benefits. How is this sustainable? If you don't like it, don't shop at walmart, costco, or any store that has foreign made products. Go work for companies that believe and practice in doing business with people here. Resist the temptation that to be competitive, you have to go offshore. What goes around comes around.I guess I was hoping for more actual information from people and less having to defend myself for asking how well something is built. I just assumed that everyone would have thought knowing the construction quality of a machine was just as important as knowing how well the users like it. Why should you feel you have to defend yourself? Who's holding you accountable for how well something is constructed?
Never assume that what you think is important is the same as everyone else. Not everyone can be like you, the world needs different kinds of people to function properly.
This message was modified Nov 7, 2010 by aa335
|
aa335
Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434
|
|
Re: Snowblowers - 2010 24"/28" Quality Construct Detailed Parts Inspection
Reply #30 Nov 7, 2010 11:47 pm |
|
From all users opinions and reports of maintnance that I've read thus far, the Hondas and Ariens' Platinum line are in direct competition, with the Honda having a name premium, quieter operation, and hydro drive, and the Ariens having cheaper replacement parts, more accessories, and quick-turn/auto-traction. That said, a couple of the parts on the Honda seem to be universally viewed as superior (f.e. the Helical gearbox vs Worm). I'm torn between the two; and I don't have enough information about the other brands to do comparisons with their equivilent models. Please help? Hmm...direct competition between Honda and Ariens? Each one has quite different business model and customer base. Care to elaborate on why you think they are in direct competition? I don't know what you mean when you said helical gearbox versus worm. Why so torn? What is your overall goal? To make an informed decision for your own purchase of a "snowblower" or to provide "harvested" information to others to make an informed decision? I think people are quite capable of harvesting information on their own to make informed decision on a multitudes of models, why limit themselves with just two of the Ariens and Honda models you selected?
This message was modified Nov 7, 2010 by aa335
|
|
|