Abby’s Guide > Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) > Discussions > John Deere 928E issues
Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions |
|
Ozz0830
Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Points: 5
|
|
John Deere 928E issues
Original Message Dec 20, 2008 3:15 pm |
|
Hi all,
First snowblower, and first post to go with it!
I just purchased a John Deere 928E at the local John Deere dealership. I figured that spending the extra cash on a JD would get me a top notch machine with top notch performance.
I have used it twice. The first time out the motor began jerking a few different times, but would then start behaving again.
The second time out (this morning), it jerked a couple times, but then the chute started having trouble turning. When turning it to the right, it would only go about 3/4 max and then get stuck, where I couldn't turn it either way. I would grab and turn it enough for the gear to start working again and it would turn the OTHER way, but still get stuck when going to the right.
After finishing up, I decided to take a look at it a few hours later, and now it has ceased to work altogether. We are supposed to be getting another large snowfall Sunday /Monday.
Anyone else have this problem? Anyone have any suggestions? Anyone else feel as though they got taken for a ride when they bought a John Deere?
Thanks for any help anyone can offer.
|
danen_inc
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Points: 1
|
|
Re: John Deere 928E issues
Reply #8 Dec 29, 2008 9:52 am |
|
I just picked up up a John Deere 928E from a local Lowes up here in Canada, just happened to be in the store and they had 9 in stock. This year snowblowers are few and scarce here you get what you can and not what you want. I know they're supposed to be good machines, however when I took it home in the crate and started to assemble it I realized I was missing some parts. First of all the crank on the dash to turn the chute was missing and the chute itself looked like it been hit by something probably a forklift, it was bent and and there was a tear in it. Furthermore it was even missing the black guide clips for the chute so that it can be attached to the blower itself. Now I'm wondering how good is this machine if right out of the box its missing this many pieces. My question to myself is what else is it missing that I can't see. Catch 22, I want a snowblower but can't get it replaced with anything else because the store doesn't have anymore. Called them up and spoke to a manager and a John Deere rep is supposed to come over and take a look at the machine. Anyone else have a missing parts problem?
|
pvrp
Joined: Nov 14, 2008
Points: 151
|
|
Re: John Deere 928E issues
Reply #9 Dec 29, 2008 11:36 am |
|
I just picked up up a John Deere 928E from a local Lowes up here in Canada, just happened to be in the store and they had 9 in stock. This year snowblowers are few and scarce here you get what you can and not what you want. I know they're supposed to be good machines, however when I took it home in the crate and started to assemble it I realized I was missing some parts. First of all the crank on the dash to turn the chute was missing and the chute itself looked like it been hit by something probably a forklift, it was bent and and there was a tear in it. Furthermore it was even missing the black guide clips for the chute so that it can be attached to the blower itself. Now I'm wondering how good is this machine if right out of the box its missing this many pieces. My question to myself is what else is it missing that I can't see. Catch 22, I want a snowblower but can't get it replaced with anything else because the store doesn't have anymore. Called them up and spoke to a manager and a John Deere rep is supposed to come over and take a look at the machine. Anyone else have a missing parts problem? If I were you I'd take the machine back immediately for a full refund, then worry about finding another one. You don't need the hassles of having various companies attempt to fix your problems. You shouldn't be having problems. Paul
|
MacLorry27
Joined: Dec 23, 2008
Points: 54
|
|
Re: John Deere 928E issues
Reply #10 Dec 29, 2008 1:25 pm |
|
danen_inc
Check your receipt, but in the U.S. Lowe’s has a 30 day return policy for power equipment. Just pack everything up and take it back to the store. You don’t even need a reason for returning it, but the fact that it’s missing parts and damaged is full justification in anyone’s book. Have them give you another 928 and have them set it up. The John Deere is made by Simplicity, which has about as good a reputation as any brand of snow thrower. Likely the crate for yours was damaged in shipping and some parts dropped out somewhere. That’s why I would have Lowe’s set it up. You can double check the setup when you get the 928 home. However, if you want to set it up yourself, inspect the next create for any damage before you take it home. Mac
|
Ozz0830
Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Points: 5
|
|
Re: John Deere 928E issues
Reply #11 Dec 30, 2008 5:59 pm |
|
Out of curiosity.... Does anyone know the HP rating on the 928E? When I purchased it, the John Deere associate told me 9HP (JD dealership), the Lowe's technician/mechanic told me 11.5 HP. I emailed John Deere, and they wouldn't give me an answer. They told me they measured the power in CC's, not HP.
I figure someone on THIS forum MUST know the definitive answer!!
Thanks!
|
pvrp
Joined: Nov 14, 2008
Points: 151
|
|
Re: John Deere 928E issues
Reply #12 Dec 30, 2008 6:56 pm |
|
I emailed John Deere, and they wouldn't give me an answer. They told me they measured the power in CC's, not HP.
Even though you can't describe power in cc's this might have been the good answer just the same :-) There's some question about the different horsepower ratings for engines with the same displacement (cc's, cubic centimeters) but no one is arguing over the displacements themselves, and usually more displacement equals more power. I'd guess your engine is more like 11-12 hp than something less. Paul
|
MacLorry27
Joined: Dec 23, 2008
Points: 54
|
|
Re: John Deere 928E issues
Reply #14 Dec 30, 2008 7:37 pm |
|
The JD 928e uses the B&S 305cc Snow Series engine model number 200000. This engine is rated at 13.5 ft-lbs. of torque in accordance with SAE J1995. Under that standard torque is measured at 3060 RPM and horsepower is measured at 3600 RPM. If we assume a flat torque curve, which is not likely, you can calculate horsepower using the following equation. HP = Torque ft-lbs. x RPM / 5252 Substituting the values you would get the following. (13.5 x 3600) / 5252, which is 48600 / 5252, which is 9.25 horsepower. It’s likely that torque is less than 13.5 at 3600 RPM, so I would round this off to 9 horsepower. Now you know where the 9 in 928 comes from, and the 28 is the width in inches. By the way, to get 11 horsepower you would need 16.0 ft-lbs. Torque at 3600 RPM. To get another 2 HP out of this engine at the same RPM requires getting more air/fuel into it. That usually means either a bigger carburetor and/or a less restrictive exhaust system and/or a different cam profile. However, B&S could just put a stop or different linkage on the 9 HP engine that prevents the throttle from opening 100%. Why, it’s all in marketing. Customers are willing to pay more for more HP, but it’s cheaper to have fewer engine models. The solution is to build a 11 HP engine and then limit the maximum throttle setting for the 9 HP model. Then again, maybe there is no difference at all and the 9 HP is really the 11 HP engine, but it’s only marketed as 9HP. You would need a dynamo to figure it out.
|
borat
Joined: Nov 10, 2007
Points: 2692
|
|
Re: John Deere 928E issues
Reply #15 Dec 30, 2008 8:06 pm |
|
The JD 928e uses the B&S 305cc Snow Series engine model number 200000. This engine is rated at 13.5 ft-lbs. of torque in accordance with SAE J1995. Under that standard torque is measured at 3060 RPM and horsepower is measured at 3600 RPM. If we assume a flat torque curve, which is not likely, you can calculate horsepower using the following equation. HP = Torque ft-lbs. x RPM / 5252 Substituting the values you would get the following. (13.5 x 3600) / 5252, which is 48600 / 5252, which is 9.25 horsepower. It’s likely that torque is less than 13.5 at 3600 RPM, so I would round this off to 9 horsepower. Now you know where the 9 in 928 comes from, and the 28 is the width in inches. By the way, to get 11 horsepower you would need 16.0 ft-lbs. Torque at 3600 RPM. To get another 2 HP out of this engine at the same RPM requires getting more air/fuel into it. That usually means either a bigger carburetor and/or a less restrictive exhaust system and/or a different cam profile. However, B&S could just put a stop or different linkage on the 9 HP engine that prevents the throttle from opening 100%. Why, it’s all in marketing. Customers are willing to pay more for more HP, but it’s cheaper to have fewer engine models. The solution is to build a 11 HP engine and then limit the maximum throttle setting for the 9 HP model. Then again, maybe there is no difference at all and the 9 HP is really the 11 HP engine, but it’s only marketed as 9HP. You would need a dynamo to figure it out. If there is a true difference in power between engines of the same displacement, shouldn't the part numbers vary? If the more powerful engine has a different cam or carburetor would that not be reflected in the part number? If I had paid for an 11 h.p. engine and was supplied a carb or cam for an 9 h.p. I wouldn't be too happy with that. If the part numbers don't change from one rating to the next, one would have to assume that the engine is either at one end of the power spectrum or the other right? By the way, my engine is rated at 9.5 h.p. From my experience with other engines in this class, It's a pretty potent 9.5.
This message was modified Dec 30, 2008 by borat
|
MacLorry27
Joined: Dec 23, 2008
Points: 54
|
|
Re: John Deere 928E issues
Reply #16 Dec 30, 2008 9:41 pm |
|
If there is a true difference in power between engines of the same displacement, shouldn't the part numbers vary? If the more powerful engine has a different cam or carburetor would that not be reflected in the part number? If I had paid for an 11 h.p. engine and was supplied a carb or cam for an 9 h.p. I wouldn't be too happy with that. If the part numbers don't change from one rating to the next, one would have to assume that the engine is either at one end of the power spectrum or the other right? By the way, my engine is rated at 9.5 h.p. From my experience with other engines in this class, It's a pretty potent 9.5. I don't know what method B&S uses to change the HP of otherwise identical engines, but it could be nothing more than some linkage going into one hole of a plate attached to the shaft of the throttle butterfly on the 9 HP engine and that same linkage going into a different hole on the 10 or 11 HP engine. You wouldn’t be able to tell this from looking at the part numbers as they are all the same, it’s just what hole the linkage goes into. On the 9 HP engine, that set up limits the throttle opening to just 82% of full open, which knocks off 2 HP. I don’t know if this is how B&S does it, but it would explain how otherwise identical engines can have different power outputs. The advantage for B&S is they can easily span a large HP range with just a few engines, which means they can reduce the cost of those engines. It’s also means dealers have to keep fewer parts in inventory. Likely there’s an easy means to get the maximum power out of one of these engines, but if you have a drive system, impeller and auger designed to handle 9 HP it’s really not a good idea to put 11 HP into it. Then again, as I said in Reply #14, "maybe there is no difference at all and the 9 HP is really the 11 HP engine." I certainly wouldn’t fee ripped off by getting 11 HP for the price of 9 HP if the rest of the machine can handle it.
|
|
|