Abby’s Guide > Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) > Discussions > Toro vs Craftsman
Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions |
|
SnowRemover
Toro 828LXE
Location: Near Albany, NY
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Points: 139
|
|
Toro vs Craftsman
Original Message Jan 14, 2005 10:52 am |
|
Here are the facts I can find:
Model | Toro | Craftsman | | Price | $1,294 | $1,190 | (all taxes, extended warranties included) | Warranty | 2 yrs | 5 yrs | (both in-home / in-home pickup) | CR rated | # 1 | # 4 | | Free wheel steering | Y | Y | | Horsepower | 8 hp | 9 hp | | Wheel Size | 15 “ | 16 “ | | Everything else (clearing path, etc) seem equal. Normally I would jump on the Toro, based on its superior rating, not only for this model, but for many of their other models that have consistently done well in CR ratings. The only caveat is, in a big storm (15” or more) does anyone think the extra 1 hp of the Craftsman will make a difference. Two people I work with have Ariens (hard to believe I don’t disclose everything about my life in one post so this fact might shock some people). One loves his 8.5hp Ariens and says it is more than adequate even in 15” storms, the other disagreed and traded in the 8.5 hp Ariens for an 11hp Ariens. The “end of the driveway” was the argument for the latter co-worker getting a bigger machine. Both co-workers say their wives could not use their Ariens due to handling is difficult (especially getting it out and in the garage where the pavement is dry). So for me, the Ariens is not a product I want to consider. I’m curious as to your opinions specifically about the hp between the Toro and the Craftsman. Is it necessary to get a bigger machine (I live in upstate NY, but not in Syracuse or Buffalo – near Albany, where we get about 60” year in total snowfall).
This message was modified Jan 14, 2005 by SnowRemover
It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them! --Friedrich Nietzsche
|
jubol
Location: Dover, De
Joined: Oct 3, 2003
Points: 1558
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #1 Jan 14, 2005 11:07 am |
|
SR, If you are going to buy a Craftsman blower, buy the 8HP, OHV, Murray built. Weight 223 pounds, while not a heavy weight, it is not a lightweight either. I think the Murrays are better built than an MTD Machine. I understand that the OHV engines put out about 20 % torque more than a flat head engine. So a 8HP OHV from Sears is equal a 9.6 HP Flat head. Fred
This message was modified Jan 14, 2005 by jubol
Husqvarna STE927(11.5HP) snowblower, MTD Pro Series 18/42 Lawnmower, MTD 6.5 HP Self Prop Lawn Mower, Weedeater 1500 Blower, Web Gensis 2000
|
SnowRemover
Toro 828LXE
Location: Near Albany, NY
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Points: 139
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #4 Jan 14, 2005 11:18 am |
|
The Sears website specifies the unit is using a Tecumseh 9hp engine. I've read others recommend the Murray over the MTD, but I don't think Murray is making Craftsman any more - they are in Chapter 11. Do you think the Toro 8hp is close enough in power to the Tecumseh? While it's only 1hp, the difference is 12%. Thanks.
It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them! --Friedrich Nietzsche
|
SnowRemover
Toro 828LXE
Location: Near Albany, NY
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Points: 139
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #5 Jan 14, 2005 11:20 am |
|
SR, You have some problems with your chart. Check your facts. Could you be more specific? I rechecked it, but don't see a mistake.
It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them! --Friedrich Nietzsche
|
Jonathan
I am a marvelous housekeeper. Every time I leave a man I keep his house. -Zsa Zsa
Location: Near Albany NY
Joined: Sep 12, 2004
Points: 320
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #6 Jan 14, 2005 11:59 am |
|
I don't think the difference in horsepower between the two machines you have listed is significant. The Toro might take a bit longer to complete the job, but I don't know for sure. In my case I went with an 11.5 HP vs. 8HP because of the length of my drive and having to deal with two EODs (have rental property next door). I didn't go with the more expensive differential (professional series) because of budget. The machine turns on a dime with one wheel unlocked. This morning I spoke with someone at work who has had a side business for many years doing repairs to mowers, snowblowers, and rototillers. Without mentioning this forum I asked him if in his experience he has seen any difference in quality between the Ariens, Toros, and Simplicities vs. the machines made by MTD, Murray, and AYP. He said he would go with the first group.
This message was modified Jan 14, 2005 by Jonathan
2004 Ariens 11528LE, Troybilt Horse "Big Red" Tiller (original), Troybilt Tuffy Tiller (original), Sears LT1000 mower, Lawn Boy 7073 21" mower, Stihl FS55 RC trimmer, Poulan Countervibe 3400 chainsaw
|
lland
Joined: Sep 17, 2002
Points: 605
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #7 Jan 14, 2005 12:12 pm |
|
"...but I don't think Murray is making Craftsman any more - they are in Chapter 11." From the article: "We will operate the business as usual, ensuring a seamless transition for our customers,..." United Arilies is in chapter 11 and still flying US Airways is in chapter 11 and still flying (for now) K Mart continued to operate "as ususal" through chapter 11 Most companies that file for chapter 11 protection continue to operate and many come out of it stronger than when they went in (they are allowed to unload alot of obligations). The concern is WILL they come out of chapter 11 or will MTD buy the name? LL
2001 Toro 20023 Personal Pace 2002 John Deere Trimmer/Edger/Blower 2003 Craftsman DYT 4000 - 25HP/48" w/bagger 2003 Toro 826LE Snowblower 2004 Mantis Tiller/Dethatcher/Aerator/Edger 2005 Husqvarna 145BT Backpack Blower Rubbermaid 10CF Trailer Craftsman 40" Plug Aerator
|
SnowRemover
Toro 828LXE
Location: Near Albany, NY
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Points: 139
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #8 Jan 14, 2005 12:19 pm |
|
K Mart continued to operate "as ususal" through chapter 11 Didn't they just "buy" Sears? But I did a little more digging on Murray, and it doesn't look good. As of Jan. 6 "Briggs & Stratton is in negotiations to acquire most of the assets of bankrupt Murray Inc., a consumer lawn and garden equipment manufacturer that owes Briggs about $40 million." One really interesting point in the article was this: "On January 4, the Wall Street Journal published an analysis of the potential deal. In that article, some industry observers speculated that Briggs may be looking to enter the consumer market with Briggs-branded equipment." Click here for article.
It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them! --Friedrich Nietzsche
|
Dave___in___CT
Deliberate often... ...decide once...
Location: West-Central Connecticut
Joined: Sep 17, 2002
Points: 3159
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #9 Jan 14, 2005 12:29 pm |
|
Hi... ..."The only caveat is, in a big storm (15” or more) does anyone think the extra 1 hp of the Craftsman will make a difference. "...
Can't say without using both side-by-side in the same snow...
It's not just the HP that affects performance... this is only one part of it... A lot of the machine's design and components used can/do affect it a lot...
For example... Quote from BCS AMERICA: "WHY INVEST IN BCS I. PERFORMANCE In virtually all outdoor, walk behind, power equipment sold in the US, power is transferred from the engine to the transmission by a belt. At its best, a belt loses 15% of the engine’s power in the transfer. In reality, the percentage is much higher. Every BCS tractor, by contrast, utilizes a spring-loaded, double cone clutch to transfer the engine’s power. The clutch loses less than 3% of the engine’s power. Because it is self-adjusting, the clutch maintains this high degree of efficiency through decades of use. Many manufacturers couple their belt(s) to transmissions that are nothing more than more belts and/or chain drive mechanisms. BCS combines its clutch with super-efficient transmissions of shafts and gears. "...
Dave...
This message was modified Jan 14, 2005 by Dave___in___CT
Whether you think you can or you can't... you're right.Henry Ford BCS Tractor & snowblower
|
SnowRemover
Toro 828LXE
Location: Near Albany, NY
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Points: 139
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #10 Jan 14, 2005 12:36 pm |
|
Dave_in_CT, Does BCS make snow throwers for anyone?
It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them! --Friedrich Nietzsche
|
Dave___in___CT
Deliberate often... ...decide once...
Location: West-Central Connecticut
Joined: Sep 17, 2002
Points: 3159
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #11 Jan 14, 2005 12:58 pm |
|
I don't know if BCS manufactures for anyone else... I really really doubt a standalone snowblower would be one if they did... They make professional grade 2-wheel tractors that use a variety of attachments... like... rototiller... snowthrower... brush cutter... chipper/shredder... and lots more available from them & other manufacturers... I have an older BCS 8 HP 2-wheel tractor... ...the single-stage snowthrower attachment... and other attachments... Here it is in action... Their website is www.bcsamerica.com Be ready for "price sticker shock"... Dave... Hmmmm.... the picture was here... gone now...
This message was modified Jan 14, 2005 by Dave___in___CT
Whether you think you can or you can't... you're right.Henry Ford BCS Tractor & snowblower
|
SnowPro
Location: Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
Points: 395
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #13 Jan 14, 2005 2:09 pm |
|
The Sears website specifies the unit is using a<BR>Tecumseh 9hp engine Do you think the Toro 8hp is close enough in power to the Tecumseh? While it's only 1hp, the difference is 12%.Thanks.
The difference is quite literally nothing. They are the SAME Tecumseh engine. It is all marketing and stickers. For example: The engine in question has a dyno rating of say 8.4 horsepower. So, Toro looks at it and says "let's call it 8 hp". Ariens says " close to 8.5 so that is what we will call it". Sears looks at it and says " well it is more than 8 hp and we know that horsepower sells so lets order the 9.0 hp stickers." Same engine. Different perspectives. Bottom line....... look at the other features NOT the horsepower rating of similar machines. Ken :)
|
SnowRemover
Toro 828LXE
Location: Near Albany, NY
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Points: 139
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #14 Jan 14, 2005 2:19 pm |
|
I just called a local dealer who says he has two Toro 828LXE's in stock. He assembles them as soon as he gets them to make sure they work and will drop the price to $1,250 (with tax it jumps past $1,340 - but the $50 is worth it to buy local). That said, is there anything I should look at to make absolutely SURE it is not a used product. Thanks!
It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them! --Friedrich Nietzsche
|
spottedpony
Joined: Aug 23, 2004
Points: 301
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #16 Jan 14, 2005 5:55 pm |
|
does anyone think the extra 1 hp of the Craftsman will make a difference.
There are 2 basic ways of measuring horsepower. At the crankshaft or flywheel and on the ground. I dont think one hp would present a noticible difference except possibly in conditions that max out a machine. even then with all the factors involved there could be no noticable difference. Weight of a machine, type of drive (belt, chain or gears) tire or track size. its entirely feasible that a higher horsepower machine would actually have less usable horsepower to propel the machine and power attachments.
a good example of this is some years ago i had 2 tractors rated at the same pto horsepower (a case and an allis chalmers) it would be a very long post if i went into specifics about each, but pulling identical tools behind them the case would work 10 to 15% more ground in the same time period using approximately the same amount of fuel. presumably the reason for this was more usable horsepower on the ground, therefore more horsepower available to work. it would be interesting to take say 10 identical engines (10 hp briggs for instance) and dyno all of them to see how close to actual hp raitings they all were.i woudlnt be at all surprised if there was as much as 10% difference between all of them.
|
AZinOH
Those who accept self-deception will perish by it. Shakespeare said "to thine own self be true".
Joined: Nov 25, 2004
Points: 189
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #24 Jan 14, 2005 8:03 pm |
|
If the choice is between 1 horsepower and quality, choose quality. 1 more horsepower will never pay a really noticeable dividend over the long haul, but quality always will. Even if 1 less horsepower is noticeable, it will simply take a little longer to do the job. I'm biased, I chose a Toro. AZ
This message was modified Jan 14, 2005 by AZinOH
Snowblower...Toro Power Max 726te 2004 Lawn tractor...AYP w/ 14.5 Briggs-42in 2000
|
AZinOH
Those who accept self-deception will perish by it. Shakespeare said "to thine own self be true".
Joined: Nov 25, 2004
Points: 189
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #27 Jan 14, 2005 9:06 pm |
|
The Murray built machines for Craftsman have higher bars.For me that is a handling factor. To bad they'r going belly up. Mine handles pretty good.Bigger tires are better too.Toro is better quality.I would buy a Toro before Ariens.OHV motor if you can get one. Don't hold me to it, but as far as I know none of the Toros have an OHV engine. I'm not knocking the Tecumseh SK's, but I am happy with the R*tek two stroke in my Toro 726 and very glad I have it.
AZ
Snowblower...Toro Power Max 726te 2004 Lawn tractor...AYP w/ 14.5 Briggs-42in 2000
|
Marshall
As Long As There Are Tests, There Will Be Prayer In Public Schools. ;- )
Joined: Sep 16, 2002
Points: 7730
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #28 Jan 14, 2005 9:48 pm |
|
Just for the record, I want to say to everyone, this forum has no allegiance to any manufacturer over any other manufacturer nor do any of it's moderators. I know the regulars here know this because they have been around long enough to see all kinds of different brands being recommended by all of us. This is mainly directed to the new folks that are clueless, through no fault of their own, to any history of the forum.
All of the moderators on this site try their best to recommend what they feel is best for the members with the information members provide. If it happens to be brand X, then that is what they feel is a better solution. If it happens to be brand Y or Z, then they feel that is the best option based on the information provided.
With exceptions of course, there are some givens in the OPE world. One of them is that the Simplicities, Toro's Snapper's, Honda's Deere's, Kubota's, etc. of the world, are a better quality machine as a whole than products from MTD and Murray in what they manufacture. Most usually, not always but, most usually in the world of Outdoor Power Equipment, the more you spend, the better quality you get. The "you get what you pay for" rule is close to being correct most of the time in this industry.
If we error on anything, it's that we try to err on the side of quality because we want you to be a happy customer with whatever it is you decide. If we always recommended the cheapest solution, I can promise you we would have many folks hot under the collar with us and would not be doing anyone any favors!
Personally, I subscribe to the buy more heavy duty than I need theory because my equipment always lasts and doesn't get worn out in a few years. I try to keep in mind that not everyone wants to buy like I do and that price is a huge factor as well. In general, we try to recommend the best machine possible for your needs and pocketbook!
Our recommendations are based on facts taken from hands on experience, knowledge of those we trust that have provided their opinion, a history of the performance of the product and our experience in looking at new models with new features and coming up with an opinion on what they may or may not provide you. We are not always right, by any means, and we will disagree between us from time to time. But, be it known and believed, our passion about this field is high and we are here for free to give answers and suggestions.
We are in no one's pocket and no one is paying us for doing this. Being this is a new forum, actually a new site starting up, I thought it might be nice for some folks to know this in order help them understand us and our motives better.
OK, enough on that. Marshall
This message was modified Jan 15, 2005 by Marshall
|
Richie
Bring On The White Stuff
Location: Long Island, New York
Joined: Dec 12, 2003
Points: 562
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #30 Jan 15, 2005 9:14 am |
|
Personally, I subscribe to the buy more heavy duty than I need theory because my equipment always lasts and doesn't get worn out in a few years. I try to keep in mind that not everyone wants to buy like I do and that price is a huge factor as well. In general, we try to recommend the best machine possible for your needs and pocketbook!
Hey Marshall,
Glad you wrote that post, I think it really needed to be said. As for the above quote, that's probably the most true statement of all. Perhaps we all would love that Honda 924 in our garage, but how many could really afford it? The Sears Craftsman line has a smart way of marketing their snowblowers, give a large name brand engine, usually OHV, at a relatively low price compared to Honda, Simplicity, and Toro, and you make easy sales. I've seen their snowblowers in the past offered with 9hp engines, for something like $600.00.
Richie
|
Dave___in___CT
Deliberate often... ...decide once...
Location: West-Central Connecticut
Joined: Sep 17, 2002
Points: 3159
|
|
Re: Toro vs Craftsman
Reply #31 Jan 15, 2005 10:22 am |
|
Nice post Marshall ! Why not add it to your " Snowblower Questions, please read before posting. TY" post ?
Opps... should be post.... not posy ! LOL...
Dave...
This message was modified Jan 15, 2005 by Dave___in___CT
Whether you think you can or you can't... you're right.Henry Ford BCS Tractor & snowblower
|
|
|