Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
M00seUK
Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295
|
|
Dyson Digital Slim
Original Message Jul 19, 2010 5:58 pm |
|
Here's the details of a trademark that Dyson has filed for a to-be-launched project, the 'Digital Slim':- http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/tm/t-os/t-find/t-find-number?detailsrequested=C&trademark=2552353 As usual, the trademark covers a multitude of product categories. Personally, I'd reckon the most likely candidate is a 'slim' upright vacuum, with a 'digital' motor. Dyson have used the 'slim' name before - on the DC18. The upright range has long been missing a product with digital motor. I would also be good if by slim, they mean as thin in profile as the DC03 - which could be hung on the wall and take up next to no space inside a storeage cupboard:-
The major downside was it's small, weedy motor. But if replaced with a similar model using a digital motor, it wouldn't have that same issue.
This message was modified Jul 19, 2010 by M00seUK
|
DC18
Dyson, Sebo and Bissell user
Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Points: 294
|
|
Re: Dyson Digital Slim
Reply #29 Jul 29, 2010 12:41 pm |
|
Hello DC18: You have to have an inclination for the ball dyson models to like them. I thought the DC15 did a decent job on rugs. But it was a monstrosity. Most people just didn't cotton up to the vacuum. They were intrigued with it. But price turned them off along with poundage. Much like the HOOVER Z which was criticized for those reasons. Most dyson users/buyers who I talk with, if they like their dysons, tell me they don't like the ball model. When I ask them what dyson model they use, they can't always tell me but say right off NOT THE ONE WITH THE BALL. At the expense of being redundant, I believe a DDM slim upright is not on the dyson radar screen yet except in the minds of Sir James and perhaps a few close to him. Missed the boat on lightweights like a slim and robots where dyson could have carved out nice niche markets to supplement its business operations. Too scattered and unfocused on all things not vacuums. It's hurt him and the company except for lifting short term ego and immediate bucks in the bank. Carmine D. Hello Carmine D Yes you do I suppose. The newer Ball Models are lighter to the DC15, and I think the DC15 does a very good job on rugs\carpets, but I'm told the DC25 goes one better! The DC15 was very bulky compared to the DC25 thats out now! It's a shame Dyson didn't (or maybe they are working on it!) push the DC18 Slim Model more, I like the DC18 especially as the cleaning head pertrudes the actual body of the cleaner. I'm hoping the Dyson DDM Slim in more than in the minds, and that they are working on this project. They need a model in the line up that can go flat on the floor to clean under low furniture without having to use the tools all the time. Heres hoping!! DC18
This message was modified Jul 30, 2010 by DC18
|
M00seUK
Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295
|
|
Re: Dyson Digital Slim
Reply #31 Oct 23, 2010 9:26 am |
|
Backing up the previous (since deleted) claim on the Dyson Wikipedia page, the 'Digital Slim' is confirmed as 'DC35'. It's cordless, uses the Dyson Digital Motor, an independently driven brushbar (1,400 RPM, with carbon fibre brushes)... 'the most powerful lightweight cordless vacuum cleaner'... however, I suspect that no-one reckoned it would look quite like this:- http://www.binglee.com.au/home-appliances/vacuums-floor-care/stick/dyson-dc35-dc35-cordless-vacuum-cleaner Dyson genius or market failure? They certainly seem ever proud to break from the accepted norm. I guess this could still be classified as a 'stick vac'?
This message was modified Oct 23, 2010 by M00seUK
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Dyson Digital Slim
Reply #33 Oct 23, 2010 6:54 pm |
|
Wow. What can one say? A picture is worth a 1000 words and in this case a belly full of laughs. I wouldn't classify a stick vac by any stretch of the vacuum industry imagination. No more than I would classify a Kirby a bagless vacuum just becuase it uses an after market retrofitted Keeler bagless dirt bin. The DC35 is more a hand held vacuum with attachments. Not a new concept for vacuums in the USA. Decades ago HOOVER capitalized [or tried to] on the same concept in the 60's and 70's with the Pixie Vac and Handi Sac vacuums [the latter were called stick unless used with attachments in hand held mode]. In fact, GE initiated the concept in the 40's with the GE Tidy Vac. A small handheld with shoulder strap and attachments including wands. A number of vacuum makers have come before dyson's DC35 slim whatever it is. Not sure what the price for this product is/will be but if it follows in the line of other dysons it's sure to be way overpriced. Carmine D. Sears has gone on the band wagon with this idea too. If you own a Kenmore can, yoiu can purchase a handheld cleaner to tag on to your existing PN and wandsfor quick-ups without using the main cleaner.
http://www.sears.com/shc/s/p_10153_12605_02021000000P?prdNo=2&blockNo=2&blockType=L2 Venson
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Dyson Digital Slim
Reply #35 Oct 24, 2010 9:38 am |
|
My Black and Decker mains corded hand held does the exact same thing!
Hi vacmanuk,
Though it's for light work, have you found an advantage? Venson
|
M00seUK
Joined: Aug 18, 2007
Points: 295
|
|
Re: Dyson Digital Slim
Reply #36 Oct 24, 2010 4:09 pm |
|
Thanks Carmine / Venson – I didn’t know that this arrangement had been tried before. In the Dyson case, it appears to be a standard DC31, a Dyson Motorhead part and a connecting wand. Beyond this, it looks like very little additional product design has gone in to it? It looks like it’s positioned for quick pickups. I imagine for the moment that the battery life remains the same? When I lived in an apartment with wood laminate floors, I would frequently use a DC16 handheld, to pick up debris that I had swept in to a pile. I can see how this new Dyson might be quicker in this regard. But one point puzzles me; why the powerhead? Surely if used on carpeted floor it will soon fill up the bin – wouldn’t a mid to large-sized canister be more suitable for a powerhead arrangement? The one bonus I can see is it being cordless and much more approachable for quick clean ups and dumping. Maybe there’s a certain user case for it - it won’t have cost them much to develop and can claim a certain crown of being the most powerful cordless lightweight. I agree that the price (converted from $ASD) does seem too high, but as said with the Air Multiplier, they’ll always aim a unique product like this, see which way the wind blows and discount if potential buyers act indifferent.
This message was modified Oct 24, 2010 by M00seUK
|
|
|