Abby's Guide to Vacuum Cleaners
Username Password
Home Discussions Reviews More Guides
Abby’s Guide > Vacuum Cleaners > Discussions > Electrolux Twin Clean Bagless Canister

Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Search For:
Severus


If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...

Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397

Electrolux Twin Clean Bagless Canister
Original Message   Mar 31, 2010 5:55 pm
This is a curious product for sale at a leading wholesale club. The reviews seem to be very good.  The interesting thing is that it is bagless with a dual self cleaning filter system.   apparently, a dummy light comes on when it's time to switch from one filter to the other.  Anyone have any experience with this vacuum?  Is the self cleaning filter design good? 

Electrolux® Twin Clean™
Bagless Canister with Pet Kit

Electrolux® Twin Clean™
Bagless Canister with Pet Kit

Dual HEPA Filtration
Crevice & Dusting Brush &
Bonus Pet Kit Included

Item # 502878
Rated4.571 out of 5 4.6 out of 5
Open Ratings Snapshot
Rating Snapshot (14 reviews)
5 stars
11
4 stars
2
3 stars
0
2 stars
0
1 star
1
(out of 14 reviews)      
13 of 14 (93%) customers would recommend this product to a friend.


The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable.  The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking. 
Replies: 14 - 14 of 14Next page of topicsPreviousAllView as Outline
vacmanuk


Location: Scotland UK
Joined: May 31, 2009
Points: 1162

Re: Electrolux Twin Clean Bagless Canister
Reply #14   Apr 9, 2010 2:57 pm
CarmineD wrote:
I was referring to the Electrolux Intensity in my post not the Miele Art series.  I was never impressed with the Miele Art.  My feeling is that Miele was capitalizing on a market of baby boomers in the early 2000's who had more money than sense.  These were the target market buyers of these lightweight uprights for small living quarters [recall the artzy fartzy designs and colors].  When the tech sector went bust in the USA, and the baby boomers found themselves with 1/10 of the wealth they had once amassed, the Art series died.  Along with the teckies who never recovered their money status either.  Soon to follow was the home market.  Once an American dream, the truth of the bust of 2008 in the USA is that home ownership is no longer an American dream and status symbol of working Americans.  Most Americans from now out will be renters not buyers.  Not a bad thing.  THis was the norm in the US prior to WW11.

Carmine D.



Apologies there!

Actually its in the U.S that the Miele D'Art is still available amongst few countries where it is still popular. I don't find it a bad idea particularly when it copied a rare and small company called Princess, who in the 1980's sold catalogue only electric mains powered sweepers. The difference is that Miele made the mistake of producing suction only floor heads and poor motor power coupled with a clogging design. My grandmother had two of the electric sweepers and they were brilliant and yet simple in their design; a motor driven brush roll depositing light dust into a cloth bag that could be emptied, washed completely or damp cloth washable and then just replaced back into the machine. To activate it, you had to stand on a plastic pedal that pushed down on a coil within the base of the handle. My grandmother used her walking stick to get it going but she could successfully lift it up on a table (only weighed around 2kg) to open the hood when getting to the bag. I wish I could find a picture on the internet to show you this sweeper, I believe in the UK it would certainly still make an impact on sales following the poor reliability of battery cordless types.
This message was modified Apr 9, 2010 by vacmanuk
Replies: 14 - 14 of 14Next page of topicsPreviousAllView as Outline
Vacuum Cleaners Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2024 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.