Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #183 Apr 24, 2010 2:44 pm |
|
Hi mole Bingo!!! upkeep/service or lack of....will kill any vacuum but more so on a bagless....99% of most bagless dont come in for service until its cyclones/filters are caked up clogged up....and that neglect is gonna cost you more due to the xtra time and work involved in restoring it to its like new performance...... i like the filtering of the dysons...but lifetime they are not. but proper filter maint is a must on dysons/bagless......the dysons /bagless that came in for annual maint with proper filter maint were the ones that performed as good as the day they were bought. turtle
Hello turtle: Why are the dysons brought in for service [if they are perforiming as good as new]? Preventative maintenance? Carmine D.
|
retardturtle1
Joined: May 16, 2009
Points: 358
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #184 Apr 24, 2010 4:09 pm |
|
Hello turtle: Why are the dysons brought in for service [if they are perforiming as good as new]? Preventative maintenance? Carmine D. Hi Carmine
Yes....we did have some dyson/bagless owners who were all about prevent maint. on everything they own...new filters every year-belts..ect reguardless of how clean they were....nor were any of them pet owners....that i do remember for sure . They were all very happy with their vacs and how they performed...(no pets..odor ) could be the reason? This was when the 7 and 14 were still pretty popular..and when we used to work on them. Idont really remember seeing any dust leaks anywhere either...but did see the light coating of dirt/dust when you removed the pre-mtr filter on some not all. turtle
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #185 Apr 25, 2010 8:05 am |
|
Hi Carmine
Yes....we did have some dyson/bagless owners who were all about prevent maint. on everything they own...new filters every year-belts..ect reguardless of how clean they were....nor were any of them pet owners....that i do remember for sure . They were all very happy with their vacs and how they performed...(no pets..odor ) could be the reason? This was when the 7 and 14 were still pretty popular..and when we used to work on them. Idont really remember seeing any dust leaks anywhere either...but did see the light coating of dirt/dust when you removed the pre-mtr filter on some not all. turtle Thanks turtle. Filters and servicing are more costly in bagless vacuums. Needed more often too than in bagged vacuums. Preventative maintenance is highly recommended to keep the bagless working properly vice bagged vacuums which can take more abuse and neglect than the more labor intensive sensative bagless. Have to daily dump dirt bins because of small capacities and temperament of motor to dirt/lack of air flow. So I ask, what are the advantages of bagless over bagged.
Carmine D.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #187 Apr 25, 2010 1:54 pm |
|
You've hit the nail on the head here Carmine! The advantages that Dyson would have all consumers believe is that you don't need to buy bags and that's the first "convenience" that most buyers could agree with (well, until the drive belt goes on their Dyson if they haven't got the motor clutch protected models!) as well as the other hyped fact that bags clog and don't therefore fill up, weaken the suction and dust gets left behind.
Thank you. Years ago, vacuum bags were sold primarily through independent vacuum stores that may have been few and far between. A throw back to the old permanent cloths. Over the years, grocery, drug, big box retailers and a host of others added/sell vacuum cleaner paper bags. Not to mention quick and easy direct buys from the vacuum brand makers and/or bag makers through the internet. Buy 8-12 bags per pack[s] at one time/visit and the vacuum consumer is good for a year or more. Painless. Bagless has been around for years in the vacuum industry and the argument in favor of bagless is always the same: No cost and inconvenience for buying bags. Really? By now, it's a "shell" game. Vacuum consumers catch on quick. Doesn't take 5174 prototypes to figure it out. The hype for bagless is much greater than the "shell" game workers lead buyers to believe. Especially when the users realize that the pre-post motor filters for bagless are far more costly than paper bags, require regular user maintenance frequently and dumping that darn old dirty bin is an extreme pain. Give vacuum customers bagged every time. No fuss, no muss. No hassles.
Carmine D.
|
retardturtle1
Joined: May 16, 2009
Points: 358
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #189 Apr 25, 2010 6:06 pm |
|
Hi Carmine Yes....we did have some dyson/bagless owners who were all about prevent maint. on everything they own...new filters every year-belts..ect reguardless of how clean they were....nor were any of them pet owners....that i do remember for sure . They were all very happy with their vacs and how they performed...(no pets..odor ) could be the reason? This was when the 7 and 14 were still pretty popular..and when we used to work on them. Idont really remember seeing any dust leaks anywhere either...but did see the light coating of dirt/dust when you removed the pre-mtr filter on some not all. turtle Thanks turtle. Filters and servicing are more costly in bagless vacuums. Needed more often too than in bagged vacuums. Preventative maintenance is highly recommended to keep the bagless working properly vice bagged vacuums which can take more abuse and neglect than the more labor intensive sensative bagless. Have to daily dump dirt bins because of small capacities and temperament of motor to dirt/lack of air flow. So I ask, what are the advantages of bagless over bagged.
Carmine D. HI Carmine No advantages at all....none. a bagged vacuum is/will always be better by far... its simple and sweet , Ive yet to see a bagless [except sanitaire-comm. dust cup] that can handle the stress of comm. use.....dead within a year. A good bag will keep and contain the dirt..allowing the filters and motor to stay clean and free flowing. Dysons/bagless are best suited for in home use/very light duty.....and will last /work fine with proper maint and service....every year....or better yet , use a bagged Tempo for $100.00 and outclean/outlast bagless/dysons and enjoy all the money you save/saved...just my view. turtle
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #190 Apr 25, 2010 9:24 pm |
|
Thanks turtle. Filters and servicing are more costly in bagless vacuums. Needed more often too than in bagged vacuums. Preventative maintenance is highly recommended to keep the bagless working properly vice bagged vacuums which can take more abuse and neglect than the more labor intensive sensative bagless. Have to daily dump dirt bins because of small capacities and temperament of motor to dirt/lack of air flow. So I ask, what are the advantages of bagless over bagged. Carmine D. HI Carmine No advantages at all....none. a bagged vacuum is/will always be better by far... its simple and sweet , Ive yet to see a bagless [except sanitaire-comm. dust cup] that can handle the stress of comm. use.....dead within a year. A good bag will keep and contain the dirt..allowing the filters and motor to stay clean and free flowing. Dysons/bagless are best suited for in home use/very light duty.....and will last /work fine with proper maint and service....every year....or better yet , use a bagged Tempo for $100.00 and outclean/outlast bagless/dysons and enjoy all the money you save/saved...just my view. turtle
Thanks turtle1. I agree with you. The "no cost for bags" is snake oil marketing. No advantages of bagless over bagged over the long haul. In fact, just the reverse is true.
Carmine D.
This message was modified Apr 25, 2010 by CarmineD
|
retardturtle1
Joined: May 16, 2009
Points: 358
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #192 May 12, 2010 4:44 pm |
|
The first and maybe LAST bagless vacuum I had, was a Fantom Fury from 1996. I HATED that thing with a red hot chili pepper passion! I remember when vacuuming the dust would literally collect on the outside of the vacuum. The dirt cup when taken out and emptied, and placed back in, never felt like it was making a tight seal. I think it stopped working in 2000. I was never so glad. I said I would never get another bagless vacuum. I ended up getting a Kenmore canister and I fell in love with canisters. I'm sure technology with bagless has improved greatly since then, but I can't get past the fact of "EMPTYING" a bagless vacuum, whether it be upright or canister. I will give you an example......Say, it's winter time.....frigid outside........you're cleaning house.......dust cup is full........Do you dump it in the trash can in the kitchen? (NO!) dust will fly around and continue to do so each time someone throws something in the trash until the trash is taken out. My trash collection bin is in my garage......Do I dump the dirt just in the trash bin itself.........I can visualize a cloud of dust everytime I throw a bag of garbage in the trash bin. I would love the fact of not having to buy bags and filters, but what I just described is what prevents me from getting a bagless vacuum (other than Rainbow). You can mist the inside of a plastic bag.... dump bin inside [and have no dust ploom] close up bag ,,,,tie shut and discard. or on a bagged.....pop out old pop in new and be on your way.....vacuuming while keeping all the dust and dirt where it belongs.....in the bag.
turtle
|
|
|