Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #15 Feb 11, 2010 2:27 pm |
|
Dustmite, Don't get your panties in a wad. Dysons aren't meant for the tiny percentage of people who have really serious allergies. Miele does make 0 emissions vacuum - confirmed by independent lab tests. It's expensive, and the bags and filters are expensive. If you have a medical condition, you likely need to spend the money on such things. Have you repeated the man's tests with your own particle counter? Or does Dyson even claim to have 0 emissions? If not, then let it go. It's really not a big deal. Given that Hertz has no problem emptying a bagless vacuum, it isn't even important whether Dyson is completely sealed. Completely sealed is for people who live in bubbles or have serious medical conditions. The wind blowing will expose you to more allergens than you'll be exposed to with most modern vacuum cleaners. Look Goof, Straight men do not wear panties...get it straight! This guy has been established as a con by many vac guys. I can care less if you get-it.
|
Hertz
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
Points: 199
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #16 Feb 11, 2010 4:40 pm |
|
DIB, QUIT INSULTING PEOPLE! It makes you look like a child! I really appreciate you're passion for Dysons, but please, for your own sake, stop insulting people who don't agree with you - argue sure, but "goof"? No need dude, unless you were simply kidding around :P I do however agree that this guy is simply a Miele suck up as he even sates that "Sebo's are not sealed vacuums" - BAHAHAHAHA! What a chump. Anyways, I'm really curious if Dysons are completely sealed from a Design standpoint - like how much effort did they put in to make sure the system is air tight. This matters because A.) Dust will fly into the other housings of the unit and gunk it up and B.) Air born allergens from outside aren't as harmful as those being sucked out of the rug. Either way, I'm sure it's not a big deal in terms of vacuuming cleanliness, as they're obviously sealed ENOUGH, but I'm just wondering if they're COMPLETELY sealed? Can someone at least answer if there's any air coming out of the cord rewind on the canister models?
|
Severus
If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #18 Feb 11, 2010 6:00 pm |
|
DIB, QUIT INSULTING PEOPLE! It makes you look like a child! I really appreciate you're passion for Dysons, but please, for your own sake, stop insulting people who don't agree with you - argue sure, but "goof"? No need dude, unless you were simply kidding around :P I do however agree that this guy is simply a Miele suck up as he even sates that "Sebo's are not sealed vacuums" - BAHAHAHAHA! What a chump. Anyways, I'm really curious if Dysons are completely sealed from a Design standpoint - like how much effort did they put in to make sure the system is air tight. This matters because A.) Dust will fly into the other housings of the unit and gunk it up and B.) Air born allergens from outside aren't as harmful as those being sucked out of the rug. Either way, I'm sure it's not a big deal in terms of vacuuming cleanliness, as they're obviously sealed ENOUGH, but I'm just wondering if they're COMPLETELY sealed? Can someone at least answer if there's any air coming out of the cord rewind on the canister models? According to this web site: http://www.allergybuyersclubshopping.com/dyson-stowaway-dc23-motorhead-canister-vacuum-cleaners.html?itemId=2420, the Dyson DC23 has sealed HEPA filtration - "We tested the sealed HEPA filtration system to confirm that it expels only clean air. The HEPA filter is washable and the vacuum is bagless, which means no vacuum cleaner bag costs! We found that the bin to be hygienic and easy to empty." There are links to other Dyson vacuums, so you can read their comments on them as well.
The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable. The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking.
|
Just
Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Points: 172
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #19 Feb 11, 2010 6:18 pm |
|
Just poking my nose in to say "I told you so:"Opinion to follow, I think Dysons look pretty neat. I have never used one but would like to try one just for the heck of it. I wish they were a little more wallet friendly for a plastic machine, but hey they are all going plastic. I think the comment in an above post is right on. Even if a machine is totally sealed, once you go to empty the dust container, it is going to be open so it's all moot anyway. Look at Filter Queen. A fine machine, great suction, good durability, good filteration. BUT--you end up taking it outside and dumping it like a shop-vac. Something seems lost in the process for me. The old Kirbys were not so great filteration, and then you dumped them on a newspaper and let more dirt fly. Still there is nothing that I could say bad about a Kirby. But I will always admit to being partial. The Rainbow was supposed to trap all the dirt in water washed air. But there is some dirt that is hydrophobic and would escape in the air path. It was good in theory. In the end you could do worse than a Dyson, you may be able to do better; but it's you that you have to please. If you like it, it works for you, you can afford it. Go for it.
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Dysons filtration?
Reply #20 Feb 11, 2010 6:49 pm |
|
Just poking my nose in to say "I told you so:"Opinion to follow, . . . In the end you could do worse than a Dyson, you may be able to do better; but it's you that you have to please. If you like it, it works for you, you can afford it. Go for it. Just, that's not fair! You're stating perfect common sense.
Venson
|
|
|