Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 30, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: whatever happened to the Rainbow enthusiasts
Reply #33 Jan 3, 2010 12:19 pm |
|
HAPPY NEW YEAR to you also. Yep, I bought a Kirby. Sold it about a month back so I guess you could say I did not think it was worth what I paid. No, I did not say you did.
I never sold new Kirby vacuums. But from time to time, a loyal Kirby customer would insist on a new Kirby to buy. When one did, I always connected the buyer with a local Kirby distributor for a good price. I stayed out of it and let them do the deal. I didn't want anything for thre referral, tho it was always offered. I will say in over 40 plus years, before Buffett was the Kirby owner, I never had a Kirby buyer return to tell me that he/she regretted the buy. In fact, several came back and bought another and another over the years. Kirby has excellent name brand recognition in the industry and a loyal niche market of buyers/customers who have been its mainstay sales for generations. Tho I think in the current economy new Kirby sales would be very difficult regardless of the customer loyalty/sales pitch. Carmine D.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: whatever happened to the Rainbow enthusiasts
Reply #34 Jan 3, 2010 3:45 pm |
|
Procare, I enjoy defending my words (when I’m right), only I do not recall saying James Dyson was first with Bagless. He and his team are no-doubt the first to invent and/or innovate the worlds first consumer friendly vacuum cleaner separator package/system. I personally hate the word bagless. Anyways... below is the Newcombe patent. Who here can ascertain from this patent if the claims worked and how well? Funny thing is Hoover UK passed on using this patent to demonstrate prior art as well as other Dyson competitors. It looks like a hell-of-an-attempt. Look, you guys are desperate to find error or a chink in the Dyson armor. If the guy was not first with cyclonic, then he should be deemed brightest and smartest instead. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/1420665.pdfDyson Invents Big Dib-ster: The point is that Sir James Dyson, your idol, publicly and professionally takes all credit for bagless vacuums now. You give dyson here this credit when you impugn copy cat brands and models for imitating dyson bagless. But it's not Sir James invention. Dyson copied a little known patent/inventor from 1922. At least to Rexair's credit, it perfected bagless technology for household applications 80 years ago. All here would agree, except perhaps you and Sir James [after 5174 prototypes], that anyone with a little time, money and inclination can parlay the advances in the vacuum industry over 70 years with Newcombe's 1922 patent to produce a bagless vacuum that works better than Newcombe's 1922 version. To Sir James Dyson's credit, he built himself a fortune by doing so and a new [really 70 years old] bagless vacuum industry got a renewed and profitable lease on life. Carmine D. Carmine, “Publicly and professionally” ...hey that rhymes. Good for you. Dyson Invents Big
This message was modified Jan 3, 2010 by DysonInventsBig
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 30, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: whatever happened to the Rainbow enthusiasts
Reply #35 Jan 4, 2010 1:56 am |
|
Dib-ster: The point is that Sir James Dyson, your idol, publicly and professionally takes all credit for bagless vacuums now. You give dyson here this credit when you impugn copy cat brands and models for imitating dyson bagless. But it's not Sir James invention. Dyson copied a little known patent/inventor from 1922. At least to Rexair's credit, it perfected bagless technology for household applications 80 years ago. All here would agree, except perhaps you and Sir James [after 5174 prototypes], that anyone with a little time, money and inclination can parlay the advances in the vacuum industry over 70 years with Newcombe's 1922 patent to produce a bagless vacuum that works better than Newcombe's 1922 version. To Sir James Dyson's credit, he built himself a fortune by doing so and a new [really 70 years old] bagless vacuum industry got a renewed and profitable lease on life. Carmine D. Carmine,
“Publicly and professionally” ...hey that rhymes. Good for you.
Dyson Invents Big Dib-ster:
PROCARE's post about Newcombe's 1922 bagless vacuum invention/patent rings true. Sir James Dyson, an inventor extraordinaire according to you, copied a 1922 bagless vacuum patent/invention. Then, Sir James in his marketing pitch supposedly tests 5174 bagless prototypes, never once crediting Newcombe's patent, before finally perfecting the bagless upright. Sir James Dyson takes all the credit. Even claims all the knock offs are stealing from him. Slick marketing reinventing and/or reinnovating truth. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jan 4, 2010 by CarmineD
|
Severus
If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Points: 397
|
|
Re: whatever happened to the Rainbow enthusiasts
Reply #37 Jan 4, 2010 4:52 am |
|
Based on your posts here you sold all the vacuums you ever bought including a dyson DC07 except a Rainbow which you still have. By your selling actions and posts are you saying that all the vauums you ever owned and subsequently sold were not worth the prices you paid except for the Rainbow? Carmine D.
Carmine,
The interesting thing about Rainbow owners is that they tend to be extremely loyal. I'm always amazed when I read the overwhelming number of positive reviews by Rainbow owners. Sure there are those who hate them, but most like the water filtration idea. I heard an administrative assistant say that she bought one when she was first married - and paid nearly $3000 with interest payments. It broke down after 7 or so years. Yet, she still would like another one. Even though it's a bit of a pain in the butt to use, she felt like she was missing something without it. I was shocked that with her limited resources, she and her husband would even consider buying a Rainbow. For whatever reason, there seems to be an emotional attachment to these vacuums.
This message was modified Jan 4, 2010 by Severus
The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable. The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: whatever happened to the Rainbow enthusiasts
Reply #38 Jan 4, 2010 7:12 am |
|
Dib-ster: PROCARE's post about Newcombe's 1922 bagless vacuum invention/patent rings true. Sir James Dyson, an inventor extraordinaire according to you, copied a 1922 bagless vacuum patent/invention. Then, Sir James in his marketing pitch supposedly tests 5174 bagless prototypes, never once crediting Newcombe's patent, before finally perfecting the bagless upright. Sir James Dyson takes all the credit. Even claims all the knock offs are stealing from him. Slick marketing reinventing and/or reinnovating truth. Carmine D. Carmine, You’re an idiot, but you’re our idiot. :) The Newcombe patent is a salad spinner (for fine dust), and not a ‘cyclonic separator.’ Dyson Invents Big P.S. I only spoon fed you (the group) the Newcombe patent because I was bored. And you did not fail me... you provided a good laugh.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 30, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: whatever happened to the Rainbow enthusiasts
Reply #39 Jan 4, 2010 9:16 am |
|
Carmine, The interesting thing about Rainbow owners is that they tend to be extremely loyal. I'm always amazed when I read the overwhelming number of positive reviews by Rainbow owners. Sure there are those who hate them, but most like the water filtration idea. I heard an administrative assistant say that she bought one when she was first married - and paid nearly $3000 with interest payments. It broke down after 7 or so years. Yet, she still would like another one. Even though it's a bit of a pain in the butt to use, she felt like she was missing something without it. I was shocked that with her limited resources, she and her husband would even consider buying a Rainbow. For whatever reason, there seems to be an emotional attachment to these vacuums.
Hello SEVERUS:
I have a dear friend who bought a new Rainbow when he first got married. He chides that his wife left him after 7 years but the Rainbow is still going strong after 30. Carmine D.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 30, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: whatever happened to the Rainbow enthusiasts
Reply #40 Jan 4, 2010 9:20 am |
|
Carmine, You’re an idiot, but you’re our idiot. :) The Newcombe patent is a salad spinner (for fine dust), and not a ‘cyclonic separator.’ Dyson Invents Big P.S. I only spoon fed you (the group) the Newcombe patent because I was bored. And you did not fail me... you provided a good laugh. Dib-ster:
Sir James copied [stole] Kenneth J's patent for the ball facilitator and used it 13 years later on his vacuums calling it a dyson original too. Seems like a pattern with your fave inventor extraordinaire. BTW, being called an idiot in your eyes is the highest compliment I can receive from you. I'm not laughing when I say it. Carmine D.
|
Severus
If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Points: 397
|
|
Re: whatever happened to the Rainbow enthusiasts
Reply #42 Jan 4, 2010 7:48 pm |
|
Dib-ster: PROCARE's post about Newcombe's 1922 bagless vacuum invention/patent rings true. Sir James Dyson, an inventor extraordinaire according to you, copied a 1922 bagless vacuum patent/invention. Then, Sir James in his marketing pitch supposedly tests 5174 bagless prototypes, never once crediting Newcombe's patent, before finally perfecting the bagless upright. Sir James Dyson takes all the credit. Even claims all the knock offs are stealing from him. Slick marketing reinventing and/or reinnovating truth. Carmine D. "Then I saw on top of a lumberyard this giant cyclone, and that gave me the idea to develop the cyclones—one of only a few filtration devices that don't have cloggable membranes. Even electrostatic filters can theoretically clog, but they don't even work in this application yet. The cyclone was on top of a factory, 30 ft. high, collecting sawdust all day long and losing suction." James Dyson from Popular Mechanics interview: http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/home_journal_news/4236719.html Based on his comments, Rainbow actually did everything James wanted in a vacuum. If James had had a Rainbow, he might have never bothered to go into the vacuum business.
The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable. The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking.
|
|
|