Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Original Message Jun 4, 2009 1:02 pm |
|
New lightweight with OBT in town for $250 with free bags for life and zero cost maintenance warranty for life. Anything goes wrong, a new vacuun is shipped to you. http://www.garryvac.com/ Taking a page from ORECK on the giveaways: Free Steam Mop to keep if not satisfied with purchase and returned. https://www.garryvacuum.com/order_form.html?country=CA Comments? Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 4, 2009 by CarmineD
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #73 Dec 21, 2009 4:42 pm |
|
HS: If your highlighted statement is true, then I believe you were not all that impressed with dyson's DC07. After all, one does not sell their treasures, let alone their assets without good reasons. BTW, I owned and used dyson's DC07 long before the ORECK Classic. Dyson didn't work on my carpets. Gawdawful clutch and floating head are not what wool medium pile carpets call for. Went for a new ORECK thanks in large part to your bad mouthing. Having been in the business, tho never selling new ORECK's, I was always impressed by the compliments that ORECK customers had for their ORECK's. So I was surprised by your attacks of it. So when I had the opportunity I bought one for $150. ORECK works fine and has for over 2 years. In fact I bought 3 more just like it. You keep what works and you like using and share with others. If I can finagle a toy ORECK for the grands then what more can I ask for Christmas. Carmine D. I do not consider a vacuum to be a treasure or an asset. It is simply another tool around the house. They are simply a hobby to pass time. I was and still am impressed with the DC07. At least as impressed as I can be with a vacuum. I bought a new Electrolux in 1973 which I am sure is still worth more than the DC07. Still no regrets.
I once owned a car (1968) that was one of 476 built that year. It had no special value back then. Today they sell for upwards of half a million and are not as rare as the one I owned. I do have regrets of selling that one. I don't know the difference in your medium pile and mine, however the DC07 never had a clutch problem after 3 years of use. I did use the DC07 on some expensive wool carpet in an elderly aunts home with no problem. You might be surprised at what isn't working if you did a deep cleaning. Anyway, a MERRY CHRISTMAS to you and the family. May God bless all.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #74 Dec 21, 2009 7:09 pm |
|
I do not consider a vacuum to be a treasure or an asset. It is simply another tool around the house. They are simply a hobby to pass time. I was and still am impressed with the DC07. At least as impressed as I can be with a vacuum. I bought a new Electrolux in 1973 which I am sure is still worth more than the DC07. Still no regrets. I once owned a car (1968) that was one of 476 built that year. It had no special value back then. Today they sell for upwards of half a million and are not as rare as the one I owned. I do have regrets of selling that one. I don't know the difference in your medium pile and mine, however the DC07 never had a clutch problem after 3 years of use. I did use the DC07 on some expensive wool carpet in an elderly aunts home with no problem. You might be surprised at what isn't working if you did a deep cleaning. Anyway, a MERRY CHRISTMAS to you and the family. May God bless all. HS:
And therein is the difference. A good tool is an asset never to be lent or borrowed. In my business more vacuums were in need of repair after lending and borrowing. Not a wise practice. Learned today that grand baby number 4 is on the way. Grand daughter number 3 broke the Dirt Devil toy vacuum handle last night after it survived her two older sisters for more than 3 years. A new toy ORECK is needed for sure now. Merry Christmas to you and yours. Carmine D.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #76 Dec 22, 2009 6:56 am |
|
HS: BTW, I have upgraded rug padding which in concert with the looped medium wool pile was a disaster for dyson's DC07. The brush bar stalled constantly and the ratcheting noise drove the dog and Wife out of the house. Dyson's HELPLINE admitted that a dyson would not work after several workarounds, removing the soleplate upper and lower gaskets, and told me to return it. Not even buy another dyson. [September 2006] I also mentioned that the builder's rug contractor gave similar warnings at a homeowners meeting about 3 weeks after I made the dyson purchase. Our community has about 2400 houses in the community and many went with upgraded carpeting and padding. The homeowners who did and bought/gifted dysons had the same problems. BTW, FYI, I received a tax assessment from the county. For the 2 straight year, my property taxes in Las Vegas have been lowered due to decline in home/land values. Carmine D.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #77 Dec 22, 2009 7:27 pm |
|
I do not consider a vacuum to be a treasure or an asset. It is simply another tool around the house. They are simply a hobby to pass time. I was and still am impressed with the DC07. At least as impressed as I can be with a vacuum. I bought a new Electrolux in 1973 which I am sure is still worth more than the DC07. Still no regrets. I once owned a car (1968) that was one of 476 built that year. It had no special value back then. Today they sell for upwards of half a million and are not as rare as the one I owned. I do have regrets of selling that one. I don't know the difference in your medium pile and mine, however the DC07 never had a clutch problem after 3 years of use. I did use the DC07 on some expensive wool carpet in an elderly aunts home with no problem. You might be surprised at what isn't working if you did a deep cleaning. Anyway, a MERRY CHRISTMAS to you and the family. May God bless all. HS:
There is a very simple and easy process to determine if your vacuum is deep down cleaning. Even you can do it. Venson has posted this before here so he gets the credit. You get down on your knees up close and personal with your rugs/carpets. You separate the pile with your fingers and look at the rug backing. If it's clean with no dirt and debris imbedded at the bottom of the pile, your vacuum is working properly and doing its job. Repeat the process on different areas of your rugs and carpets to inspect the results. If you find dirt and debris there, it's time to get started vacuuming and/or opt for a vacuum that works properly. Carmine D.
This message was modified Dec 22, 2009 by CarmineD
|
Severus
If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397
|
|
Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #78 Dec 23, 2009 11:04 pm |
|
HS: There is a very simple and easy process to determine if your vacuum is deep down cleaning. Even you can do it. Venson has posted this before here so he gets the credit. You get down on your knees up close and personal with your rugs/carpets. You separate the pile with your fingers and look at the rug backing. If it's clean with no dirt and debris imbedded at the bottom of the pile, your vacuum is working properly and doing its job. Repeat the process on different areas of your rugs and carpets to inspect the results. If you find dirt and debris there, it's time to get started vacuuming and/or opt for a vacuum that works properly. Carmine D.
HS,
If you're feeling lonely, another option is to call up the local Rainbow salesman and get a "free" demo. They'll be glad to vacuum your rugs. It's actually quite fun if you have a good vacuum, and they fail to get anything significant out of your rugs. The Rainbow salesman was very frustrated when he visited. The SOB actually did something to try to sabotage my vacuum bag.
The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable. The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking.
|
earthworm
Labels are for things, not man.
Location: York Haven, PA
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
Points: 31
|
|
Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #79 Dec 28, 2009 1:00 am |
|
IMO, any product that is sold over the TV, particularly using infomercials, is suspect.. The Garry must be a Chinese knock off of the Oreck. We need reform in communications, advertising, business, education....
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #80 Dec 28, 2009 6:48 am |
|
IMO, any product that is sold over the TV, particularly using infomercials, is suspect.. The Garry must be a Chinese knock off of the Oreck. We need reform in communications, advertising, business, education.... Hello Earthworm:
If Garry is a Chinese sourced vacuum, the Corp is incorporated in the USA which is comparable to other vacuum makers and sellers in the USA. This info excerpted from the Carpet and Rug Institute Web Site about Garry and the company. The ancient Romans said it best in their native latin langauge: Caveat Emptor......Buyer beware. Carmine D.
This message was modified Dec 28, 2009 by CarmineD
|
Severus
If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397
|
|
Re: Garry Ultra Light Upright Vacuum
Reply #81 Dec 29, 2009 10:41 am |
|
IMO, any product that is sold over the TV, particularly using infomercials, is suspect.. The Garry must be a Chinese knock off of the Oreck. We need reform in communications, advertising, business, education.... Innovation and quality can come from small companies who don't have the capital to get products into the stores. The buyer should always beware of things that are too good to be true. Understanding the return policy is the responsibility of the consumer. Oreck has name recognition and a reputation of generous returns. Oreck has done fairly well in Consumer Reports testing. Unfortunately for Garry, they did not. Given the lack of history of the Garry brand, the lackluster review by Consumer Reports may be fatal to Garry -unless they make some modifications.
The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable. The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking.
|
|
|