Trebor
Joined: Jan 16, 2009
Points: 321
|
|
Bagless vs. Bagged
Original Message Nov 26, 2009 8:56 pm |
|
Regardless of what any of us may think about bagless vacuums, it looks like they are here to stay. I just gave a cursory glance to the Hoover, Dirt Devil, Bissell, and Eureka websites. None of the four brands has even 20% of their model offerings as bagged units. Canisters are different. Eureka and Bissell have over 50% of their canister offerings as bagged units, Hoover less than 50%, and Dirt Devil, none. None offer a bagged stick vac, and only Dirt Devil offers a bagged hand vac. But uprights are the lion's share of the market.
The bagless units at the top of their price points are under the entry level Dysons. Panasonic has almost left the bagless category. So, it would seem, with the exception of Dyson, that the buying public has rejected all bagless vacuums above 300.00 with the noted exception of Dyson. Are the BB manufacturers afraid to produce bagged units again for fear they will not sell? Essentially we have a split in the market: low end = bagless, high end = bagged. In terms of the respective consumer markets the only vacuum to be represented in both the specialty retailers and the BB superstores is Dyson. Not bad marketing.
|