Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Youtube

Severus wrote:

Hello SEVERUS:

By gosh.... I think you've got!  Yes, I think you've got it!

Bond fan with Sean Connery as Bond!

Carmine D.

Acerone wrote:
Nice price -- 63 bucks. Please note that, per the BB website, it is selling as an "online only" item. The Dyson Root 6 Animal is going for $180.

Venson

CarmineD wrote:
Carmine,

You find fault in this gorgeous model?  More proof your judgment cannot be trusted.

She does not work for Dyson as you assume, she’s Miss IFA 2009 and works for IFA.  She took many photos with many manufacturers products; if you did your due-diligence you’d know.  More proof your judgment cannot be trusted.


DIB

P.S.  When God makes these beauties, they look spectacular with or without wigs and with or without makeup.  Trust me I know and know it intimately!  I love the all-red IFA look and their all-red Miss IFA look too.

My judgment, DIB, is that she is wearing a wig:  As in fake hair.  What part of my judgment is wrong/in error? 

Since I can't see the rest of her, as I could with the lovely figured B&D lady, not too much more to judge.  Makes me question: What's wrong with her own hair that she prefers a wig?  And a pretty bad one at that!   

She may very well be one of God's creations but a "beauty" is stretching the truth if its's based on the little bit we can see which is a wig and alot of makeup!   I'd say your judgment is reaching beyond the given facts and more into the realm of your imagination!  Why does that not surprise me?

Now, the B&D lady, tho fully covered, has some very beautiful attributes including her own hair.  Most of her attributes despite the clothes, which fit her very well, are clearly revealed and visible w/o need for imagination thanks to the large image you posted.  Worth seeing again.  So here's an encore. 

Carmine D.

retardturtle1 wrote:
Retardturtle1,

We can agree on some things for sure (beautiful women and marrying).  I applaud you for getting married early (to me it is early).   One day you’re probably going to want kids and you’re going to want them to be proud of what you do (vac shop ownership or whatever).  Many vac shop guys feel entitled to slander another mans business so to get ahead.  As a kid who watched his father go from janitor to restaurateur and gross over $7-8m per yr. (1986 money), I NEVER ONCE heard him bad-mouth a competitor.  And as you can imagine, he had competition all around and including 40 ft. across the street.  Many of his competitors were his friends.  If lying is part of doing business or as they say…  “it’s only business” then choose another career (your not to old).  Lots (not all) of vac-shop “do-nothin’s”, “never-were’s” and “has-been’s” hang around this site and industry…  haul asssss from these types!!!!  If you cannot do it for you, then do it for your wife and future kids[?].  You’re the man of the household and family – she (and the kids?) will all look to you to deliver.

And if bad-mouthing competitor’s is the way you want to go, then be ready for the day the bad-mouthing dealers to be exposed.  What is to prevent anyone from going online (Youtube) and explaining the vac con’s and margins?  This is a great vulnerability if you think about it.


DIB

DIB:

Do you practice what you preach about the competition brands?  No!  You impugn bagged vacuums as choking on dirt tho most perform better on carpets with a full bag than your fave brand does with an empty bin.  Reference:  ASA finding and ruling that upheld the Electrolux Intensity claim that even with a full bag it's performance is 50 percent better than a dyson DC14 with empty bin.  That's stating the facts.

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:
Carmine,

I love your challenges!!!!!!  If these challenges came outside of the framework of Dyson and/or vacuuming manufacturing and selling, I would not bother...  trust me.

You love antiquities, I love innovation.  I impugn no single manufacturer, they impugn themselves.  Slothfulness, and yours and other vac dealers or vac enthusiasts supporting slothfulness or lack of innovation is theirs and their followers decision, not mine.


DIB

CarmineD wrote:
Your impugning this “looker” is typical when women are out of a mans (your) reach.  I will guess...  dating models and “lookers” was not the norm for you.

If you did your due diligence, you would have a better understanding of life outside of your [small] comfort zone (why she's wearing the red wig).  But why hassle due diligence when you can make things up? - Right Carmine?  Making up stuff is a spill over. - I’m telling you...  a deceitful-vac-shop detox program is recommended.


DIB

P.S.  Do you think the B&D woman's "twins" stand up that way all on their own or are they being helped out and held up (fake[d]) via the miracle of a push-up?  Relax...  You're letting your Dyson animosity get the best of ya (again).  I’m done with this conversation.

DIB:

The only one making things up is you.  Both about the lassies demoing the products and about me.  That's your imagination at work again.  You don't know the facts, can't understand the facts when thay are presented to you and spin all your posts with the "how great dyson and James art."  Here's a tip for you:  Don't forget to look before James' flushes!

Carmine D.

Is it true that 90% of the dyson patents are filed by the marketing department.??

I know the answer already dubba,lets see how your boy bails out of this one,You fake losers..........

MOLE