Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Dyson Japan

CarmineD wrote:
I bet your lack of *good judgment - the DC27 and/or the DC15 were stolen.

DIB

*You should of called the police and let them decide to act on it or not.

DysonInventsBig wrote:
CarmineD wrote:
I want to say thanks to you and the other Dyson DC26 rock-throwers…  It forced me to take a closer look and see what some of the benefits are and what makes this vacuum untouchable.
Bagged canisters clog and lose suction faster than uprights – fact.  When a canister is shrunk in size, so is its bag or the surface area (its filtration).  All mini sized bagged canisters are dogs…  that is, they clog/begin to clog with suctioning up only a ¼ cup of fine dust.  A homeowner needs or should often need to replace a mini-bag every room so to keep up with the no loss of suction DC26.

The DC26 destroys any canister in this category – fact.

DIB

HARDSELL wrote:

If the point you are trying to make is that ORECK does not deep clean if you use it daily, then I disagree.  If the point you are trying to make is that ORECK doesn't deep clean with a brush roll that revolves at 6,500 revolutions per minute, then I also disagree.  If the point that you are trying to make is that ORECK doesn't deep clean because it lacks the necessary suction power, then I also disagree.  If the point you are trying to make is that for all 3 reasons, the ORECK does not deep clean, then I still disagree.  Conversely, for all 3 reasons ORECK does deep clean and groom comparable to many full size vacuums on the market today, if not better.

Deep cleaning is a function of 3 vacuum features:  Rug pile agitation, brush roll action, and suction power.  I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the concept of direct suction path.  ORECK puts 102 mile per hour hurricane force wind between the carpet and the vacuum.  Where's it's needed the most.  The combination of the rug pile agitation created by the brush roll revolving at 6,500 RPM and the gale force wind of 102 MPH wind with the suction power at the closest point of vacuum cleaner [2 inches in] provides deep cleaning and grooming by the ORECK that is comparable, if not better, to many full size uprights on the market today including a dyson.

Carmine D.

mole wrote:
Hi mole,

You did not mention what Dyson upright costs “80 bucks.”  Anyhow…  if true, then your $1000-$1200 “ancients” (aka tired vacuums) build costs should come in around 50 bucks.  The fact is, these ancients require no R&D and are no longer exclusive property (protected by patents), but instead in the public domain inventions (public property).   Any pimply-faced kid with daddy’s money can copy your tired vacuums at will.


DIB

P.S.  How come you have not announced here what brands and models you carry?

              To many the bagless vac is unhygienic. There is talk that self sealing disposable containers may increase in popularity. Also wonder what is the true power is in a 115 volt motor  versus 220 volt in use over seas. 165awp is at 220 volts not 110.

              It has been noted that  many U.S. made vacuums achieve better cleaning performances as good or better than European vacuums despite our using up to 1400 w 0r 115 volts. Europe is even considering cutting wattage of their cleaners down thus needing work to improve performance Any truth to that DIB? You seem to know all.

                                                                                                                                                                                 Procare.

                                                                                                                        

DysonInventsBig wrote:

I didn't want to go there but you force me.  Dyson is a gift.  The couple, over 55 years of age, don't want it.  They plan to buy an ORECK, which they are currently using as part of the free in home trial.  They want to sell the unused dyson and use the proceeds to defray the cost of the ORECK.  They sold the dyson Sunday as part of the garage/yard sale.  Couldn't get their price but didn't want to be stuck with it.  So they took the highest offer.  It was more than $250 but less than $300.   

Carmine D.

DysonInventsBig wrote:

I'm curious DIB what is your fact based on?

Carmine D.

DysonInventsBig wrote:

Perhaps MOLE is following your advice from Matthew 7:6. "Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine,lest they trample them under their feet,and turn again and rend you." 

Why should not MOLE do the same as you?  Are you special? 

Carmine D.

DysonInventsBig wrote:
CarmineD wrote:
Come-on…  Turn a-bout is fair play Carmine.  Many Independent Vacuum Dealers beat up Dyson openly in their shops, beat up Dyson in forums and beat up Dyson by posing/lying/pretending to be consumers at online review pages or sites.  Come-on…  posting his or other Dyson bad-mouther’s wares here (vacuum brands and models they rep) should be fun.

DIB

Poor dyson, DIB.  Must be a country-wide vacuum cleaner industry conspiracy against dyson.  

Carmine D.