Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Original Message Apr 29, 2008 10:31 am |
|
Hi all, Following is a link to a news article regarding the up and down sides for Electrolux during this year's first quarter. http://www.centredaily.com/business/technology/story/553091.html Best, Venson
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Reply #53 May 20, 2008 6:57 pm |
|
Hello DIB: Make believe I'm as stupid as Tom Gasko and some others here say. Explain it so a 6 year old hearing you can understand. That is not make believe. Or a 3 year old so Carmine has better odds of understanding. Thank you, very kindly. Carmine D.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Reply #54 May 20, 2008 7:01 pm |
|
Hi DIB: Whether I agree/disagree depends on your specificity for completing the "World's First" claim. What exactly is the full claim that Electrolux makes that contradicts history and/or has been made before [in this case supposedly by dyson in 1998]? Carmine D. Carmine, Since Electrolux is in business to make money and lots of it, then it is reasonable to believe, Electrolux believes there is money to be made claiming they’re the worlds first. Free press alone is huge for the worlds first. There is no free press for second. Electrolux needs the attention of free press and to advertise this world’s first claim as so. Electrolux can “go to town” with their “World first green claim” and use this distinction on their packaging, advertising, etc. But it only takes one click from a Dyson mouse to blast the media with their Worlds first green machine thereby causing doubt as to Electrolux’s credibility and their supposed sincere answer to a ecological problem. As well it could absolutely be false advertising in the eye of the Truth in Advertising powers too. Words are a funny thing in the truth in advertising world. I do not own a copy of the Truth in advertising handbook and have no idea of the “world first” claim is something that be made into a false advertising complaint. DIB Perhaps “We’re the world’s only green vacuum currently being produced today” could resolve any potential Dyson issue (if it is an issue with Dyson).
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Reply #55 May 20, 2008 7:12 pm |
|
Dysons are so expensive partly because they are one of the best. Price some of the imports from independents. You will need a mortgage on your home ot buy one. I only speak from experience. Carmine speaks with a vengence because Dyson is superior to any vacuum that he ever sold. If you value his opinion then you should buy one of his recommended vacuums and a Dyson for comparison. I believe that if you are an honest person you will report back that Dyson is better. You apparently have not followed Carmine on some of the other forums. He has always criticized Dyson even when Dyson is not relevent to the topic. Read all the Dyson reviews by consumers. 90% or more would not buy any other brand. How many other brands can boast that?
Hardsell,
Yes, Carmine does go after Dyson much and often hard. But that is what makes it fun, his comments give me excuse to dig for Dyson knowledge. Even Mole, as nasty as he gets and the easy to disprove claims he makes is fun too. DIB
This message was modified May 20, 2008 by DysonInventsBig
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Reply #57 May 20, 2008 7:41 pm |
|
Electrolux can “go to town” with their “World first green claim” Hello DIB: Are you saying, then, that this claim by Electrolux is illegal because dyson made the claim first with the ReCyclone? Or the claim is illegal because dyson made the first green machine even if dyson did not make the claim World's First green machine? And/or both? I'm not trying to put you on the spot. I'm trying to understand what and why exactly is the supposed legal dispute that you believe dyson may/can have against Electrolux. Carmine D.
This message was modified May 20, 2008 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Reply #58 May 20, 2008 7:49 pm |
|
I'm not sure how valid the Dyson DC02 ReCyclone claim would be. Hello M00seUK:
Based on the article that Venson posted about the Electrolux Green vacuum and Tom Gasko's post about the ReCyclone, I'm trying to determine the basis for a legal action that dyson would have against Electrolux. I can't find one. DIB is uncertain I think. And you are wondering too. The score so far appears to be 3 doubters and 1 for a law suit [Tom Gasko]. Tom certainly hasn't made the case here [to me] that there is a breach by Electrolux worthy of a suit by dyson. He's insinuated some things. He's bluffed a few words and terms here and there to try and make some kind of case for a suit. But lawsuits aren't filed based on insinuations and bluffs. They're filed based on the law. He hasn't stated the law. Just some of his typical pro-dyson opinions and anti-Electrolux opinions. Makes for entertaining Forum reading. Not for valid lawsuits. Especially when Mr. Dyson is paying $10,000-$50,000 an hour for hot shot NY City lawyers with 3 names in 3 piece imported silk suits. Carmine D
This message was modified May 20, 2008 by CarmineD
|
Motorhead
Joined: Nov 2, 2007
Points: 409
|
|
Re: Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Reply #59 May 20, 2008 8:37 pm |
|
I'd have a lot more respect for these companies if they were not so lawsuit-happy, and learned how to respect the consumer.... And guess who pays for this crap ?? Why are Dysons so expensive ?? ; IMO, they look like a cheap toy ! But then, most do not have a quality appearance or are over-priced...(Kirby for one) And I do not care for HardSell's rap against Carmine...I for one do value his knowledge... Strangely, my ieSpell is a no go at this site... You must have very limited experience with Dysons and have never owned one (common with Dyson bashers here), because it is far from a "cheap toy". First of all Dysons are NOT the most expensive vacuum cleaner out there, in fact I'll go out on a limb and say Dysons fit into the "mid-priced" category very nicely. Have you priced some of the high-end machines from independent-only brands by any chance? Riccar, Simplicity, and Miele (to name a few) ALL have machines that cost well over $1000, with a lot of that money going to the dealer. No Dyson costs nearly that much (and on top of that you would REALLY get a deal from an independent Dyson dealer), yet the performance is just as good (if not better) than any of the brands I mentioned above. Enough said. -MH
|
Motorhead
Joined: Nov 2, 2007
Points: 409
|
|
Re: Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Reply #60 May 20, 2008 8:42 pm |
|
Electrolux can “go to town” with their “World first green claim” Hello DIB: Are you saying, then, that this claim by Electrolux is illegal because dyson made the claim first with the ReCyclone? Or the claim is illegal because dyson made the first green machine even if dyson did not make the claim World's First green machine? And/or both? I'm not trying to put you on the spot. I'm trying to understand what and why exactly is the supposed legal dispute that you believe dyson may/can have against Electrolux. Carmine D. Not to interject but the answer should be obvious. Not only did Dyson produce the machine, they made the claim as well. Check out the very bottom of the last page in this Dyson DC03 PDF manual. Quoted directly: "The re-cycled parts will then go to make new, Dyson Recyclone cleaners - the world's first recycled vacuum cleaner. Need I say more? -MH
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Reply #61 May 20, 2008 8:47 pm |
|
Hardsell, Yes, Carmine does go after Dyson much and often hard. But that is what makes it fun, his comments give me excuse to dig for Dyson knowledge. Even Mole, as nasty as he gets and the easy to disprove claims he makes is fun too. DIB
Mole and Carmine are two of my favorites. Carmine and I can't agree, however I look forward to meeting him some day. Mole and I have more in common with cars than vacuums.
This forum was so dulll until they joined in. If we all agreed on the same thing there would be a lot of lost information.
|
DysonInventsBig
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 1454
|
|
Re: Electrolux -- First Quarter 2008 . . .
Reply #62 May 21, 2008 2:54 am |
|
I'm not sure how valid the Dyson DC02 ReCyclone claim would be. I remember it being detailed in the book by James Dyson, but I don't think it was ever on the market for all that long. TomG has one, I think? It's certainly a collectors item. I think the deal was that they'd collect your old Dyson, shot blast it, then melt down the plastic and remold it. It was then be fitted with a new motor and sold in a reusuable sports bag. Dyson are quite good at the moment - when you order direct from them (in the UK), they offer to collect your old vac and have it recycled. But I doubt they're shipping them back to Malaysia each time! Hi Moose, I believe it does not matter how long James actually had his ReCyclone for sale to be the exclusive (for a period of time) or “worlds first”. Worlds First is a phrase used very, very much by Electrolux and one must presume it helps sell lots and lots of product and/or helps create a powerful impression in the minds of consumers that Electrolux innovation leader. There is plenty of room in consumer’s minds for another innovation leader – James Dyson. Electrolux has many worlds firsts, I say Electrolux is indeed the “worlds first” at recycled vacuums second to Dyson. Let the one time backyard inventor have his day in the sun and in the history books as the “worlds first” in recycling vacuums (assuming no others pre-date Dyson). DIB
Google – Electrolux and “worlds first”
P.S. Sorry if I come off somewhat intense in support of Mr. Dyson. I know you like the guy too.
This message was modified May 21, 2008 by DysonInventsBig
|
|
|