Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Consumer Reports - March 2008
Reply #145 Mar 1, 2008 8:55 am |
|
tryin to twist again. Actually your comment is senseless. To say that there is no absolute best would be inclusive of all brands. Now, if I had said that there is definitely an absolute worst then I may have included a couple of those you mention.
My good friend:
Factor in the price for the vacuum, and my vote would be for your fave brand as the worse of all. Carmine D.
This message was modified Mar 1, 2008 by CarmineD
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Consumer Reports - March 2008
Reply #146 Mar 1, 2008 9:01 am |
|
MH: THis is an old [read out-of date] argument that a fine fellow Jim B made years ago on a now defunct Forum. Long before dyson was raked over the coals for making false claims about "never clogs, never loses suction." Both of which are no longer used by retailers. Do you have any new arguments and/or endorsements to make for dyson performance and operation besides word of mouth? Carmine D.
The Dyson claims were meant for intelligent people, not an idiot who would try to use it as a leaf vacuum or some other off the wall use. Desperate companies often go to any means to destroy competition. They used such examples to say that the Dyson clogs. Sadly the law all too often sides with them. Even sadder is an old has been who loves these scenarios try and support his hate for something that kicked his a$$. Hoover should be required to post on their bagless machines. "The filter screen on this vacuum will almost immediately clog with use resulting in poor performance". "You should have another vacuum to assist with cleaning the screen and pleated filter".
Word of mouth is about the best endorsement a product can receive. Remember the old addage that people will talk about a bad product and seldom mention a good one. The ones who have been shamed by Dyson do a lot of lying and bashing. The average consumer has only the highest praise for Dyson.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Consumer Reports - March 2008
Reply #148 Mar 1, 2008 9:07 am |
|
The average consumer has only the highest praise for Dyson. My friend:
I'm more interested in the above average consumers! Average consumers settle for mediocrity. Perhaps the reason they like dysons. Carmine D.
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Consumer Reports - March 2008
Reply #149 Mar 1, 2008 9:08 am |
|
I said the DC07 and DC14 "will be" discontinued. NOT "is." Why? The clutch in part. The weak brush roll. And the undeniable fact that it was designed for European carpets not USA carpets. Which reminds me. The DC07 All Carpets, a Wal*Mart exclusive, WAS discontinued. After a lackluster sales record with Wal*Mart. It is the best of all the DC07 dysons IMHO. Why? No clutch issue on USA carpets. Dyson made a fatal product error by discontinuing it. At $359 and with a 5 year warranty it would have sold much better than the existing DC07 models on the market, all of which will be discontinued as the retailers sell out and clear out. Carmine D.
Dyson is alive and well on WM site. More 5 *'s than Hoover.
What do you smoke?
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Consumer Reports - March 2008
Reply #151 Mar 1, 2008 9:12 am |
|
My friend: I'm more interested in the above average consumers! Average consumers settle for mediocrity. Perhaps the reason they like dysons. Carmine D. With all the time that you spend in WM how do you find an above average shopper?
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Consumer Reports - March 2008
Reply #152 Mar 1, 2008 9:39 am |
|
My good friend: If you are afraid to write a review on the Royal Eminence, maybe you have courage to answer me this question. As one who criticized the performance of the HOOVER WindTuinnel, HOOVER Fusion, Oreck XL21, and BISSELL Healthy Home, why would you sell the only vacuum that you ever praised as THE EXCELLENT ONE? I can understand to buy the latest and greatest in the same brand, save that then why? [I know it was a big mistake]. CArmine D.
Carmine, I am neither a writer nor a reviewer. I am simply a cosumer who hates deception and half truths. If I choose to write a review I will it wil be confined to the merits and faults of the vacuum as I see them. I will not use it as an opportunity to bash other brands as you do. Really does not take courage to participate here. You just need tolerence and patience.
My opinion of the vacuums that I returned have not changed. What in the he** does that have to do with not currently owning a Dyson? I sold the Dyson because I wanted to and because I could. BTW, I only said that I liked the DC07 better than the Bissell. Only you would try to twist that into criticism. Now the real reason is that I wanted to try other brands as I did prior to buying the Dyson. I kept the Dyson simply because I felt that it outperformed the others (including those that I tried after buying the Dyson). The latest is not always the greatest. You should know that since you are a big H fan. I would as soon have the DC07 as any of the latest Dysons. The Royal is a very good vacuum for carpets. It fails on hard floors. Dyson is still better for my use.
|
mole
.
Location: earth
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Points: 783
|
|
Re: Consumer Reports - March 2008
Reply #153 Mar 1, 2008 10:44 am |
|
O.K. you asked for it. dyr-7500 clutch upright dc04/14 dealer cost29.95. no belts. dyr-6000 motor dc07-dc14, cost26.95. dyr-1075 geared belt dc17 animal. cost 1.89. dyr-2005 b-roll with out clutch system dc04/07/14. 11.50 cost. So please explain to me again what makes dyson think it's cleaners are worth the asking price. These guy's are playing the public for SUCKERS.And we sell their parts................ MOLE
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
|
|
Re: Consumer Reports - March 2008
Reply #154 Mar 1, 2008 2:26 pm |
|
Hi Mole, Thanks for supplying the pricing information. Does Dyson dictate the price between vendor/repair person and the customer? Thanks, Venson
|
|
|