Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Big Hit on the US/World Markets
Original Message Jan 21, 2008 2:11 pm |
|
Early news reports in the USA are saying the London financial markets nosed dived today in the worse downturn ever. This comes on the heels of a 4 percent drop in the Dow Jones Industrials last week alone. Since today is a Federal Holiday in the US in observance of Dr. Martin Luther King the financial markets are closed. Not sure what impact the London market fall will have on the US markets--have to wait to see. What and how long will it take jaydee to realize that he needs to enter the low to middle price range vacuum market to stay competitive in the USA in the big box stores' venue? Any news yet on the 2007 dyson sales? Carmine D.
This message was modified Jun 27, 2008 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Big Hit on the London Markets
Reply #13 Jan 24, 2008 2:40 pm |
|
Hi Carmine, have you heard anything about a plan to reduce foreclosures by dropping the size of mortgage payments? Someone mentioned that to me in passing the other day and I want to be sure I heard right. I am assuming, if there is such a thing, it would apply to home owners who were in dire straits and not able to make full monthly payments. The bank's idea being, "Why foreclose and get nothing at all since real estate isn't moving anyway? Thanks, Venson Hello Venson:
Here's some related info: http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/14177627.html http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/jan/24/mortgage-crimes/ Carmine D.
This message was modified Jan 24, 2008 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Big Hit on the London Markets
Reply #15 Jan 24, 2008 5:47 pm |
|
Hi Venson: The recent Fed rate cut resulted in the big banks reducing their primes. Of course, prime is for their best customers, not the homeowners with mortgage payments in arrears, default, and foreclosures. BUT...if the homeowners work with their banks, mortgage holders, and/or lending institutions to "refinance" the existing interest rates downward, based on the recent Fed cuts and next week's pending drop, they may be able to keep the "wolf" away from the door. At least temporarily to get them through the bad times, which at this point is uncertain in duration. On a related vacuum note, the sale of HOOVER by Whirlpool to TTA probably happened at the best possible time for all parties involved including the vacuum industry. If the sale was not consummated when it was, it is very likely it would have fallen through. Then, HOOVER would have languished without serious business direction during these bad economic times and could have eventually faded away. Instead, HOOVER under the tutelage of TTA has introduced new competitive floorcare products. It Is advertising regularly in the papers. And HOOVER products are stocked and advertised regularly by all the big box retailers. From all outward appearances HOOVER sales are flourishing since the sale and takeover by TTA. We'll see what happens in the months ahead. Right now, all the anti-HOOVER folks who were luxuriating over the HOOVER tribulations may be eating alot of crow. Especially if HOOVER in concert with TTA becomes the number one new vacuum sold in the USA not just in units but dollar volume too. It may happen and sooner rather than later. Carmine D.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Big Hit on the London Markets
Reply #16 Jan 26, 2008 6:33 pm |
|
Please indulge me with the post script to this thread. It now appears that the Fed Chief Ben Bernanke not only flinched and panicked with the January 22 interest rate cut but he was "bluffed" too. By Friday, January 25, the consensus among all the people in the know was that the international financial markets' drop on Monday January 21, a national Holiday in the US to commemorate Martin Luther King Jr, had nothing to do with the US markets' fall the week earlier. Notta. The drops were a result of a low level rogue trader in a French bank who cost the company over $ 7 Billion in losses. How? By taking unauthorized positions and making fraudalent trades. All of which should have been caught by internal control procedures which the 31 year old bank employee circumvented. The estimated losses may reach over $70 Billion after the company unwinds the trades, which it was doing on Monday unbeknownst to the US Central Bank and the Fed Chairman. And in all likelihood these trades caused the volatility and declines that rattled European markets on Monday, January 21 and the US market decline on Tuesday morning before the Fed cut the rate by 3/4 point. The largest single rate cut in over 20 years! Now, Benboy Bernanke has a perception and credibility problem. When Benboy called an emergency teleconference meeting of the Open Market Committee on Monday evening to twist the arms of the Fed Bank Chiefs to drop the rates, ALL but one agreed. Who was the lone dissenter? The Fed Bank Chief in St. Louis, Missouri. The only one to vote "no" on the interest rate cut and say that the Fed should wait until January 30 [during its regular scheduled meeting]. Alas in our democratic scheme of things, majority rules even when the majority is wrong. The Fed acted Tuesday morning and the rest is history. If I were Benboy's boss, and I am not fortunate for him, he would have his resignation signed, sealed and delivered to me on my desk this Monday morning. Two days before the regular meeting of the Fed Open Market Committee. And Ben's successor would be................you got it. The man from the St. Louis Fed Bank who bucked the trend. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jan 26, 2008 by CarmineD
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Big Hit on the London Markets
Reply #17 Feb 25, 2008 8:17 pm |
|
Most economists predict rough economic times ahead. That could last well into 2009 and beyond. Drawing parallels in today's economy with that of the Carter years [mid to late 70's] and the Bush 1 years [early 90's]. BUT, most economists say the signs now are much much worse than in these two previous times. Why? Unusually high oil and food prices. And a much worse housing market. With rising unemployment. And lower corporate earnings reports. Plus one of the largest declines in consumer spending. All bode doom and gloom in the days ahead. BTW, how many vacuum pros made it to Las Vegas this year for the VDTA? I recall the brohaha last year when HOOVER wasn't represented. What happened this year? How will these rough times ahead affect vacuum sales? Well, we already know from the NPD that new vacuum sales were off 3 percent in 2007. After an extended period of increasing annual vacuum sales due in large part to dyson sales. Most economists say that the first clear cut sign of the bad economic times was the extremely poor consumer spending numbers for the 2007 Holiday season and in January 2008. The worse in 20 years by some accounts. So.... I suspect the beginning of the vacuum sales fall off started in late 2007 and will probably get worse as the months ahead unfold. Who will be hit the hardest? No question, the big box retailers who enjoyed a bullish market in vacuum sales from 2002-2007 in large part due to dyson sales. With a fall off starting in mid to late 2007 causing the entrenchment by most big box retailers in their vacuum inventories now. How? Lowering prices, offering giftcards in concert with discounts, and culling brands and models with clearance prices. The latter usually from the ranks of the hard to move sellers [read high end prices]. Surely any vacuum insiders here who are privileged to vacuum sales information which contradict mine will correct me if I'm wrong. Pity the thought that I spread negativity and lies. ALL COMMENTS WELCOME EVEN COMPANY PROPAGANDA [READ SALES PUFFING AND ROSY SCENARIOS FROM PRIVATELY HELD COMPANIES NOT SUBJECT TO THIRD PARTY AUDIT SCRUTINY AND REVIEW]. Carmine D.
This message was modified Feb 25, 2008 by CarmineD
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Big Hit on the London Markets
Reply #18 Feb 26, 2008 11:53 am |
|
Most economists predict rough economic times ahead. That could last well into 2009 and beyond. Drawing parallels in today's economy with that of the Carter years [mid to late 70's] and the Bush 1 years [early 90's]. BUT, most economists say the signs now are much much worse than in these two previous times. Why? Unusually high oil and food prices. And a much worse housing market. With rising unemployment. And lower corporate earnings reports. Plus one of the largest declines in consumer spending. All bode doom and gloom in the days ahead. BTW, how many vacuum pros made it to Las Vegas this year for the VDTA? I recall the brohaha last year when HOOVER wasn't represented. What happened this year? How will these rough times ahead affect vacuum sales? Well, we already know from the NPD that new vacuum sales were off 3 percent in 2007. After an extended period of increasing annual vacuum sales due in large part to dyson sales. Most economists say that the first clear cut sign of the bad economic times was the extremely poor consumer spending numbers for the 2007 Holiday season and in January 2008. The worse in 20 years by some accounts. So.... I suspect the beginning of the vacuum sales fall off started in late 2007 and will probably get worse as the months ahead unfold. Who will be hit the hardest? No question, the big box retailers who enjoyed a bullish market in vacuum sales from 2002-2007 in large part due to dyson sales. With a fall off starting in mid to late 2007 causing the entrenchment by most big box retailers in their vacuum inventories now. How? Lowering prices, offering giftcards in concert with discounts, and culling brands and models with clearance prices. The latter usually from the ranks of the hard to move sellers [read high end prices]. Surely any vacuum insiders here who are privileged to vacuum sales information which contradict mine will correct me if I'm wrong. Pity the thought that I spread negativity and lies. ALL COMMENTS WELCOME EVEN COMPANY PROPAGANDA [READ SALES PUFFING AND ROSY SCENARIOS FROM PRIVATELY HELD COMPANIES NOT SUBJECT TO THIRD PARTY AUDIT SCRUTINY AND REVIEW]. Carmine D. I think that those who buy expensive items (vacuums or otherwise) will continue this trend although they may wait for better financial forecasts. I do not see them running to WM or other stores to buy the low end.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
|
|
Re: Big Hit on the London Markets
Reply #21 Feb 28, 2008 7:29 am |
|
I think that those who buy expensive items (vacuums or otherwise) will continue this trend although they may wait for better financial forecasts. I do not see them running to WM or other stores to buy the low end. My good friend and fellow:
In a sluggish economy [read recession], the more upscale the retailer, the more they're struggling. Why? Department store operator Macy's needed a one time tax benefit to rescue the 4th quarter results it released this week. Target [cheap-chic] did better with an 8 percent drop in quarterly earnings that was still a little higher than analysts expected. And your favorite Wal*Mart with its strong emphasis on low prices reported a solid fourth quarter. It's stock price has fared better than all other retailers this past year: Up 8.1 percent at $51.40. Including BEST BUY which is down 11.7 percent at $46.50. Another: Nordstrom said profits fell 8.6. I can go on. But I think [hope] you get my point. In short, the retailers' results in 2007 and so far this year are the worse in 40 years. I'll overlook how absurd your first statement is with regard to the US housing market for 2007 and [according to the gurus] for well into 2009, 2010, and some say even 2011. Ben Bernanke told Congress he will cut interest rates further. Why? Stimulate the sluggish economy. I expect with absolute certainty that the Bush Administration will push through another financial stimulus package next year in time for the election. Not because financial forecasts are better but because they are much worse. Problem: Ben is fighting a war on two fronts: Recession at the front door, and inflation at the back. Consumers are squeezed in the middle. Higher consumer prices [food and oil are the worse], lower wages [down almost 2 percent in 2007], decreasing asset values [read home values and savings] and increasing unemployment with lower company earnings. When exactly do you predict better financial forecasts? Carmine D.
This message was modified Feb 28, 2008 by CarmineD
|
HARDSELL
Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Points: 1293
|
|
Re: Big Hit on the London Markets
Reply #22 Feb 28, 2008 9:52 am |
|
My good friend and fellow: In a sluggish economy [read recession], the more upscale the retailer, the more they're struggling. Why? Department store operator Macy's needed a one time tax benefit to rescue the 4th quarter results it released this week. Target [cheap-chic] did better with an 8 percent drop in quarterly earnings that was still a little higher than analysts expected. And your favorite Wal*Mart with its strong emphasis on low prices reported a solid fourth quarter. It's stock price has fared better than all other retailers this past year: Up 8.1 percent at $51.40. Including BEST BUY which is down 11.7 percent at $46.50. Another: Nordstrom said profits fell 8.6. I can go on. But I think [hope] you get my point. In short, the retailers' results in 2007 and so far this year are the worse in 40 years. I'll overlook how absurd your first statement is with regard to the US housing market for 2007 and [according to the gurus] for well into 2009, 2010, and some say even 2011. Ben Bernanke told Congress he will cut interest rates further. Why? Stimulate the sluggish economy. I expect with absolute certainty that the Bush Administration will push through another financial stimulus package next year in time for the election. Not because financial forecasts are better but because they are much worse. Problem: Ben is fighting a war on two fronts: Recession at the front door, and inflation at the back. Consumers are squeezed in the middle. Higher consumer prices [food and oil are the worse], lower wages [down almost 2 percent in 2007], decreasing asset values [read home values and savings] and increasing unemployment with lower company earnings. When exactly do you predict better financial forecasts? Carmine D. As usual, in your haste to show your superior knowledge you failed miserably in your rebuttal to my comments.
Not once did I mention struggling retailers. I only said that most consumers who are accustomed to upscale purchases will not rush out buy inexpensive goods. Do you predict a recession to be eternal? I do not think so, therefore many will wait out the storm. Unfortunate as it is for some now is a great time to buy a home.
|
|
|